POS AM: Post-effective amendment to a registration statement that is not immediately effective upon filing
Published on May 2, 2007
As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1,
2007
Registration
No. 333-135734
___________________________________________________________________________
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
____________________
POST-EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT TO FORM S-1 ON
FORM
SB-2
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
___________________
ACCESS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Name
of
Small Business Issuer in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3841
|
|
83-0221517
|
|
(State
or jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(Primary
Standard Industrial
Classification
Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
Number)
|
2600
Stemmons Freeway, Suite 176
Dallas,
Texas 75207
(214)
905-5100
(Address
and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)
___________________
Mr.
Stephen R. Seiler
President
and Chief Executive Officer
2600
Stemmons Freeway, Suite 176
Dallas,
Texas 75207
(214)
905-5100
(Name,
address and telephone number of agent for service)
___________________
Copies
to:
|
Jack
Concannon, Esq.
|
|
Bingham
McCutchen LLP
|
|
150
Federal Street
|
|
Boston,
MA 02110
|
|
(617)
951-8000
|
Approximate
date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective.
If
any of
the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed
or
continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the
following box. þ
If
this
Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to
Rule
462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. མ
If
this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. མ
If
this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. མ
If
delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434 under
the
Securities Act, please check the following box. མ
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
Title
of Each Class
of
Securities Being Registered
|
Amount
Being Registered
|
Proposed
Maximum Offering Price Per Share
|
Proposed
Maximum Aggregate Offering Price
|
Amount
of
Registration
Fee
|
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
9,298,170
(1)
|
$1.18
(2)
|
$10,971,840
|
$
1,173.99 (2)
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
86,083
shares and 3,863,634 shares are issuable to selling stockholders
upon
exercise of warrants for the purchase of shares of the Registrant’s Common
Stock and 5,348,453 shares of Common Stock are issuable to selling
stockholders upon conversion
of notes. All share numbers in this Registration Statement and the
accompanying prospectus reflect a one-for-five reverse stock split
of the
Company’s common Stock which was effected June 5, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The
registrant previously paid $1,173.99 of the registration fee in connection
with the filing of its Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with
the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 12,
2006.
|
The
registrant hereby amends the registration statement on such date or dates as
may
be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a
further amendment which specifically states that the registration statement
shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall
become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting
pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These
securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This Prospectus is not an
offer
to sell, nor does it seek an offer to buy, these securities in any state where
the offer or sale is not permitted.
INFORMATION
CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A REGISTRATION STATEMENT
RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL AND IS NOT A
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY IN ANY STATE IN WHICH AN OFFER, SOLICITATION,
OR
SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
PROSPECTUS
Subject
to completion, dated May 1, 2007
ACCESS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
9,298,170
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
This
Prospectus relates to the offer and sale of up to 9,298,170 shares of common
stock, $0.01 par value per share, of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Access”) by
certain stockholders of Access, namely SCO Capital Partners LLC, (“SCO”) and
affiliates (Beach Capital LLC, Lake End Capital LLC, Howard Fisher, Jeffrey
B.
Davis and Mark J. Alvino); Cornell Capital Partners, LP; and Oracle Partners,
LP
(“Oracle Partners”) and affiliates (Oracle Insitutional Partners, LP, Oracle
Investment Management, Inc, Sam Oracle Fund, Inc., Oracle Offshoe Ltd., Stuart
M. Duty and Larry Feinberg).
Access
is
not selling any shares of common stock in this offering and therefore will
not
receive any of the proceeds from this offering. However, if the warrants are
exercised, Access will receive the proceeds from such exercise if payment is
made in cash. All costs associated with this registration will be borne by
Access.
The
shares of common stock are being offered for sale by the selling stockholders
at
prices established on the OTC Bulletin Board during the term of this offering.
On April 30, 2007, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $4.95
per share. Our common stock is presently listed on the OTC Bulletin Board under
the symbol “ACCP”. These prices will fluctuate based on the demand for the
shares of common stock.
Assuming
the issuance of all the shares being sold pursuant to this prospectus, such
shares would equal approximately 72.5% of our then outstanding common stock
(including, for these purposes, shares deemed beneficially owned by the selling
security holders in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d) promulgated by the Commission
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), assuming that we issue
no other shares of our common stock until that time.
Brokers
or dealers effecting transactions in these shares should confirm that the shares
are registered under the applicable state law or that an exemption from
registration is available.
No
underwriter or person has been engaged to facilitate the sale of shares of
common stock in this offering. None of the proceeds from the sale of stock
by
the selling stockholders will be placed in escrow, trust or any similar account.
These securities are speculative and involve a high degree of risk. You should
purchase securities only if you can afford a complete loss of your
investment.
THESE
SECURITIES ARE SPECULATIVE AND INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU SHOULD
PURCHASE SECURITIES ONLY IF YOU CAN AFFORD A COMPLETE LOSS OF YOUR
INVESTMENT.
PLEASE
REFER TO "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 6.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities regulator has
approved or disapproved of these securities, or determined if this prospectus
is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling
security holders may not sell these securities until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities, and we are not soliciting an offer
to
buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
The
date
of this prospectus is May 1, 2007.
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospectus
Summary
|
1
|
|
|
Summary
Consolidated Financial Information
|
5
|
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
6
|
|
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
|
13
|
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
14
|
|
|
Determination
of Offering Price
|
14
|
|
|
Selling
Security Holders
|
14
|
|
|
Dilution
|
16
|
|
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
16
|
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
|
18
|
|
|
Description
of Business
|
27
|
|
|
Description
of Property
|
38
|
|
| Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
38
|
|
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
38
|
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
41
|
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
46
|
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
46
|
|
|
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
|
47
|
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
48
|
|
|
Market
for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
|
49
|
|
|
Description
of Securities
|
50
|
|
|
Transfer
Agent
|
52
|
|
|
Indemnification
|
53
|
|
|
Experts
|
53
|
|
|
Legal
Matters
|
53
|
|
|
How
to Get More Information
|
53
|
|
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
F-1
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
Item
24. Indemnification of Directors and
Officers
|
II-1
|
|
|
Item
25. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
|
II-1
|
|
|
Item
26. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
II-1
|
|
|
Item
27. Exhibits
|
II-1
|
|
|
Item
28. Undertakings
|
II-3
|
|
|
Signatures
|
II-5
|
|
|
Power
of Attorney
|
II-5
|
|
WE
HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS
OR
ANY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT. YOU MUST NOT RELY ON ANY UNAUTHORIZED INFORMATION.
NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS AN OFFER TO SELL OR
A
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION
WHERE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT PERMITTED. NO SALE MADE PURSUANT TO THIS
PROSPECTUS SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE
HAS
NOT BEEN ANY CHANGE IN OUR AFFAIRS SINCE THE DATE OF THIS
PROSPECTUS.
Introduction
The
following is only a summary of the information, financial statements and notes
included in this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus carefully,
including "Risk Factors" and our financial statements and the notes to the
financial statements before making any decision regarding an investment in
us.
Unless otherwise stated in this prospectus, references to "we", "us", "Access",
or "Company" refer to Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ABOUT
ACCESS
Overview
of Company
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Access” or the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation. We
are an emerging biopharmaceutical company developing products for use in the
treatment of cancer, the supportive care of cancer, and other disease states.
Our product for the management of oral mucositis, MuGard™, has received
marketing clearance by the FDA as a device. Our lead clinical development
program for the drug candidate ProLindac™ (formerly known as AP5346) is in Phase
II clinical testing. Access also has advanced drug delivery technologies
including Cobalamin™-mediated oral drug delivery and targeted
delivery.
Together
with our subsidiaries, we have proprietary patents or rights to one technology
approved for marketing and three drug delivery technology
platforms:
• MuGard™
(mucoadhesive liquid technology),
•
synthetic polymer targeted delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated oral delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated targeted delivery.
Products
We
have
used our drug delivery technologies to develop the following products and
product candidates:
ACCESS
DRUG PORTFOLIO
|
Compound
|
|
Originator
|
|
Technology
|
|
Indication
|
|
FDA
Filing
|
|
Clinical
Stage
(1)
|
|
|
Cancer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MuGard™
|
Access
|
Mucoadhesive
liquid
|
Mucositis
|
510(k)
|
Marketing
clearance
|
||||||
|
ProLindacTM
(Polymer
Platinate,
AP5346) (2)
|
|
Access
- U London
|
|
Synthetic
polymer
|
|
Cancer
|
|
Clinical
Development(3)
|
|
Phase
II
|
|
|
Oral
Insulin
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Diabetes
|
Research
|
Pre-Clinical
|
||||||
|
Oral
Delivery System
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Various
|
Research
|
Pre-Clinical
|
||||||
|
Cobalamin-Targeted
Therapeutics
|
|
Access
|
|
Cobalamin
|
|
Anti-tumor
|
|
Research
|
|
Pre-Clinical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(1)
For more information, see “Government Regulation” for description of clinical
stages.
(2)
Licensed from the School of Pharmacy, The University of London. Subject to
a 1%
royalty and milestone payments on sales.
(3)
Clinical studies being conducted in Europe and US.
1
Recent
Developments
On
April 26, 2007, Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Access”) and SCO
Capital Partners LLC and affiliates (“SCO”) agreed to extend the maturity date
of an aggregate of $6,000,000 of 7.5% convertible notes to June 11, 2007
from
April 27, 2007. On April 26, 2007, Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Access")
and
Oracle Partners LP and affiliates agreed to extend the maturity date of an
aggregate of $4,015,000 of 7.7% convertaible notes to June 12, 2007 from
April
28, 2007.
We
have
upcoming maturity dates on our convertible notes. The $6
million of Senior Convertible notes are due June 11, 2007 plus accrued interest;
and the approximately $4.0
million of convertible notes which are due June 12, 2007 including interest;
and
capitalized interest of $880,000. We are currently negotiating with the debt
holders to convert their debt to equity or to extend the terms of their due
dates.
On
April 19, 2007 we announced we had entered into an agreement to
acquire Somanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement, upon consummation of the acquisition, Somanta’s preferred and common
shareholders would receive an aggregate of 1.5 million shares of Access’ common
shares which would represent approximately 13% of the combined company assuming
the conversion of Access’ existing convertible debt under existing terms of
conversion. The closing of the transaction is subject to numerous conditions
including receipt of necessary approvals including approval of the Somanta
shareholders. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be consummated
or if consummated, that it will be on the terms described herein
All
shares and per share information reflect a one for five
reverse stock split effected June 5, 2006.
On
December 8, 2006 we amended our 2005 Asset Sale Agreement with Uluru, Inc.
Access received from Uluru an upfront payment of $4.9 million, received an
additional $350,000 on April 9, 2007 and in the future could receive potential
milestones of up to $4.8 million based on Uluru sales. The amendment agreement
included the anniversary payment due October 12, 2006, the early payment of
the
two year anniversary payment, and a payment in satisfaction of certain future
milestones. Access also transferred to Uluru certain patent applications that
Access had previously licensed to Uluru under the 2005 License Agreement. Under
a new agreement, Access has acquired a license from Uluru to utilize the
nanoparticle aggregate technology contained in the transferred patent
applications for subcutaneous, intramuscular, intra-peritoneal and intra-tumoral
drug delivery. Additionally, one future milestone was increased by
$125,000.
On
December 6, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO Capital
Partners LLC (“SCO”) and affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to
purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total
number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to December 6, 2012.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO and
affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares
of
common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access common
stock into which such holder’s note is convertible. Each warrant has an
exercise price of $1.32 per share and is exercisable at any time prior to
October 24, 2012.
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $4.5
million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO and affiliates. Each noteholder received a
warrant to purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75%
of
the total number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to February 16, 2012.
All
the
secured notes mature on June 11, 2007, are convertible into Access common stock
at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest of 7.5% per annum
and are secured by substantially all of the assets of Access. Each note may
be
converted at the option of the noteholder or Access under certain circumstances
as set forth in the notes.
2
In
the event SCO and its affiliates were to convert all of their notes and exercise
all of their warrants, they would own approximately 74.1% of the voting
securities of Access. Access may be required to pay in cash, up to 2% per month,
as defined, as liquidated damages for failure to file a registration statement
timely as required by an investor rights agreement.
In
connection with the sale and issuance of notes and warrants, Access entered
into
an investors rights agreement whereby it granted SCO the right to designate
two
individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of Access while the notes are
outstanding, and also granted registration rights with respect to the shares
of
common stock of Access underlying the notes and warrants. SCO designated Jeffrey
B. Davis and Mark J. Alvino to the Board of Directors, and on March 13, 2006
Messrs, Davis and Alvino were appointed to the Board of Directors.
On
October 12, 2005, we sold our oral/topical care business unit to Uluru, Inc,
a
private Delaware corporation, for up to $18.8 million to focus on our
technologies in oncology and oral drug delivery. The products and technologies
sold to Uluru included amlexanox 5% paste (marketed under the trade names
Aphthasol® and Aptheal®), OraDiscTM,
Zindaclin® and Residerm® and all of our assets related to these products. In
addition, we sold to Uluru our nanoparticle hydrogel aggregate technology which
could be used for applications such as local drug delivery and tissue filler
in
dental and soft tissue applications. We received a license from Uluru for
certain applications of the technology. The CEO of Uluru is Kerry P. Gray,
the
former CEO of the Company. In conjunction with the sale transaction, we received
a fairness opinion from a nationally recognized investment banking
firm.
At
the
closing of the agreement we received $8.7 million. In addition, due to the
Amended Asset Sale Agreement in December 2006, we received $4.9 million and
received an additional $350,000 on April 9, 2007 for the first and second
anniversary payments and settlement of certain milestones. We recorded $550,000
less $173,000 tax expense as revenue from the discontinued operations in
2006.
We
were
incorporated in Wyoming in 1974 as Chemex Corporation, and in 1983 we changed
our name to Chemex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We changed our state of incorporation
from Wyoming to Delaware on June 30, 1989. In 1996 we merged with Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a private Texas corporation, and changed our name to
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Our principal executive office is located at 2600
Stemmons Freeway, Suite 176, Dallas, Texas 75207; our telephone number is (214)
905-5100.
Going
Concern
The
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
have
been prepared on a "going concern" basis that contemplates the realization
of
assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course
of
business. Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their auditors'
report dated March 30, 2007, which references this matter. Management recognizes
that we must continue to generate capital and revenue resources to enable us
to
continue to meet all of our corporate obligations and sustain an ongoing
profitable business. However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful
in
these activities. Should any of these events not occur, the accompanying
financial statements will be materially affected.
3
SUMMARY
OF THE OFFERING
This
offering relates to the sale of common stock by certain persons who are the
selling stockholders, consisting of SCO and its affiliates, Cornell Capital
Partners, L.P. and Oracle Partners LP and affiliate who intend to sell up to
9,298,170 shares of common stock, consisting of shares issuable pursuant to
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,863,634 shares of our Common Stock,
4,545,453 shares of Common Stock issuable to SCO and its affiliates upon
conversion of notes, 86,083 shares held by Cornell Capital Partners, L.P.,
and
803,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of a convertible notes held by
Oracle Partners and its affiliates.
On
February 16, 2006, Access entered into a note and warrant purchase
agreement pursuant to which an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5% convertible
notes
due March 31, 2007 were sold and issued, along with warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 3,863,634 shares of Access common stock. Net proceeds to Access
were $4.5 million. The notes mature on June 11, 2007 , are convertible
into Access common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear
interest of 7.5% per annum and are secured by certain assets of Access. Each
note may be converted at the option of the noteholder or Access under certain
circumstances as set forth in the notes.
On
March 30, 2005 the Company executed a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement
(“SEDA”) with Cornell Capital Partners. Under the SEDA, the Company may issue
and sell to Cornell Capital Partners common stock for a total purchase price
of
up to $15,000,000. The purchase price for the shares is equal to their market
price, which is defined in the SEDA as 98% of the lowest volume weighted average
price of the common stock during a specified period of trading days following
the date notice is given by the Company that it desires to access the SEDA.
Further, we agreed to pay Cornell Capital Partners 3.5% of the proceeds that
we
receive under the Equity Line of Credit. The amount of each draw down is subject
to a maximum amount of $1,000,000. The terms of the SEDA do not allow us to
make
draw downs if the draw down would cause Cornell Capital Partners to own in
excess of 9.9% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Upon closing of the
transaction, Cornell Capital Partners received a one-time commitment fee of
29,300 shares of the our common stock. On the same date, the Company entered
into a Placement Agent Agreement with Newbridge Securities Corporation, a
registered broker-dealer. Pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, upon
closing of the transaction the Company paid a one-time placement agent fee
of
700 shares of common stock. The shares issued were valued at $500,000 and
recorded as Debt issuance costs and such costs are amortized as the SEDA is
accessed. As of March 31, 2006 we have accessed $600,000 of the SEDA and
$116,000 of the Debt issuance costs were charged to additional paid-in capital.
The Company currently cannot access the SEDA until a post-effective amendment
to
our registration statement is filed with, and declared effective by, the SEC.
The SEDA was effective through March 30, 2007. Certain of the shares
offered hereunder were acquired by Cornell Capital Partners in connection with
issuances of Common Stock under the SEDA.
On
November 9, 2005 the Company announced the restructuring and partial
repayment of our 7.0% convertible promissory notes due September 13, 2005.
Oracle Partners LP and its affiliates, holders of $4 million worth of
convertible notes, agreed to amend their notes to a new maturity date, June
12,
2007 , with the conversion price being reduced from $27.50 per share to $5.00
per share. In addition, the Company may cause a mandatory conversion of the
notes into common stock if the common stock trades at a price of at least 1.5
times the conversion price for a minimum number of trading days. There is also
a
provision to allow for a minimum price for conversion in the event of a change
of control of the Company. This modification resulted in the Company recording
additional debt discount of $2.1 million, which will be accreted to interest
expense to the revised maturity date.
4
The
following data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus and prior
audited consolidated financial statements of Access and notes thereto. The
data
should be read in conjunction with the “Selected
Financial Data” and Financial
Statements and Notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" appearing elsewhere in this
Prospectus.
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
For
the Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
|||||
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|||||||||
|
Consolidated
Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Data:
|
|||||||||
|
Total
revenues
|
$
-
|
$ -
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
89
|
||||
|
Operating
loss
|
(5,175)
|
(9,622)
|
(6,003)
|
(5,426)
|
(5,925)
|
||||
|
Interest
and miscellaneous income
|
294
|
100
|
226
|
279
|
594
|
||||
|
Interest
and other expense
|
(7,436)
|
(2,100)
|
(1,385)
|
(1,281)
|
(1,278)
|
||||
|
Unrealized
loss
|
(1,107)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
|
Income
tax benefit
|
173
|
4,067
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(13,251)
|
(7,555)
|
(7,162)
|
(6,428)
|
(6,520)
|
||||
|
Discontinued
operations net of taxes
$173
in 2006 and $4,067 in 2005
|
377
|
5,855
|
(3,076)
|
(507)
|
(2,864)
|
||||
|
Net
loss
|
(12,874)
|
(1,700)
|
(10,238)
|
(6,935)
|
(9,384)
|
||||
|
Common
Stock Data: (2)
|
|||||||||
|
Net
loss per basic and diluted
common
share
|
$ (3.65)
|
$ (0.53)
|
$
(3.38)
|
$ (2.61)
|
$
(3.58)
|
||||
|
Weighted
average basic and
diluted
common shares
outstanding
|
3,532
|
3,237
|
3,032
|
2,653
|
2,621
|
||||
|
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
|||
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and
short
term investments
|
$ 4,389
|
$
474
|
$
2,261
|
$
2,587
|
$
9,776
|
|||
|
Restricted
cash
|
-
|
103
|
1,284
|
649
|
468
|
|||
|
Total
assets
|
6,426
|
7,213
|
11,090
|
11,811
|
19,487
|
|||
|
Deferred
revenue
|
173
|
173
|
1,199
|
1,184
|
1,199
|
|||
|
Convertible
notes, net of discount
|
8,833
|
7,636
|
13,530
|
13,530
|
13,530
|
|||
|
Total
liabilities
|
16,313
|
11,450
|
17,751
|
17,636
|
18,998
|
|||
|
Total
stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
(9,887)
|
(4,237)
|
(6,661)
|
(5,825)
|
489
|
|||
|
(1)
|
This
data has been adjusted for discontinued operations and sales of assets.
The discontinued operations relate to the sale of our oral care and
dermatology business to Uluru, Inc. and the closing and sale of the
our
Australian laboratory described more fully in “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis or Plan of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this
Prospectus.
|
|
(2)
|
All
shares and per share information reflect a one for five reverse stock
split effected June 5, 2006.
|
5
We
are subject to various risks that may materially harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks
and
uncertainties described below and the other information in this Prospectus
before deciding to purchase our common stock. If any of these risks or
uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating
results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Without
obtaining adequate capital funding, we may not be able to continue as a going
concern.
The
report of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal
year
ended December 31, 2006 contained a fourth explanatory paragraph to reflect
its
significant doubt about our ability to continue a going concern as a result
of
our history of losses and our liquidity position, as discussed herein and in
this Prospectus. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital funding in the
future, we may not be able to continue as a going concern, which would have
an
adverse effect on our business and operations, and investors’ investment in us
may decline.
We
have experienced a history of losses, we expect to incur future losses and
we
may be unable to obtain necessary additional capital to fund operations in
the
future.
We
have recorded minimal revenue to date and we have incurred a cumulative
operating loss of approximately $77.7 million through December 31, 2006. Net
losses for the years ended 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $12,874,000, $1,700,000
and
$10,238,000, respectively. Our losses have resulted principally from costs
incurred in research and development activities related to our efforts to
develop clinical drug candidates and from the associated administrative costs.
We expect to incur additional operating losses over the next several years.
We
also expect cumulative losses to increase if we expand research and development
efforts and preclinical and clinical trials. Our net cash burn rate for the
twelve months of 2006 was approximately $550,000 per month. We project our
net
cash burn rate for the next seven months to be approximately $750,000 per month.
Capital expenditures are forecasted to be minor for the next seven months.
We
require substantial capital for our development programs and operating expenses,
to pursue regulatory clearances and to prosecute and defend our intellectual
property rights. We believe that our existing capital resources, interest
income, product sales, royalties and revenue from possible licensing agreements
and collaborative agreements will be sufficient to fund our currently expected
operating expenses and capital requirements for seven months (other than debt
and interest obligations including the approximately $6
million of Senior Convertible notes due June 11, 2007 plus accrued
interest; and approximately $4.0
million of convertible notes which are required to be repaid June 12, 2007
plus accrued interest; and capitalized interest of $880,000 due September 13,
2007). We will need to raise substantial additional capital to support our
ongoing operations and debt obligations.
If
we do raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, further dilution
to
existing stockholders would result and future investors may be granted rights
superior to those of existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available
to us through additional equity offerings, we may be required to delay, reduce
the scope of or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs
or to obtain funds by entering into arrangements with collaborative partners
or
others that require us to issue additional equity securities or to relinquish
rights to certain technologies or drug candidates that we would not otherwise
issue or relinquish in order to continue independent operations. As a result
of
our history of losses and our liquidity position, our auditors have issued
an
audit report expressing significant doubt about our ability to remain a going
concern.
We
do not have operating revenue and we may never attain
profitability.
To
date, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of common
stock and convertible notes. Contract research payments and licensing fees
from
corporate alliances and mergers have also provided funding for our operations.
Our
ability to achieve significant revenue or profitability depends upon our ability
to successfully complete the development of drug candidates, to develop and
obtain patent protection and regulatory approvals for our drug candidates and
to
manufacture and commercialize the resulting drugs. We sold our only revenue
producing assets to Uluru, Inc. in October 2005. We are not expecting any
revenues in the short-term from our other assets. Furthermore, we may not be
able to ever successfully identify, develop, commercialize, patent, manufacture,
obtain required regulatory approvals and market any additional products.
Moreover, even if we do identify, develop, commercialize, patent, manufacture,
and obtain required regulatory approvals to market additional products, we
may
not generate revenues or royalties from commercial sales of these products
for a
significant number of years, if at all. Therefore, our proposed operations
are
subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business
enterprise. In the next few years, our revenues may be limited to minimal
product sales and royalties, any amounts that we receive under strategic
partnerships and research or drug development collaborations that we may
establish and, as a result, we may be unable to achieve or maintain
profitability in the future or to achieve significant revenues in order to
fund
our operations.
6
We
may not be able to pay our debt and other obligations and our assets may be
seized as a result.
We
may not generate the cash flow required to pay our liabilities as they become
due. Our outstanding debt includes $6 million of Senior Convertible notes due
June 11, 2007, and approximately $4.0 million of our Convertible Subordinated
Notes due June 12, 2007 and $5.5 million is due in September 2010. We also
have capitalized interest of $880,000 plus interest due the Company otherwise
it
will be due September 13, 2007.
If
our cash flow is inadequate to meet these obligations, we will default on the
notes. Any default on the notes could allow our note holders to foreclose upon
our assets, force us into bankruptcy or our secured note holders could foreclose
on the escrow and pledge of our shares and sell the shares on the open market,
which is likely to cause a significant drop in the price of our stock.
We
may be unable to repay or repurchase or restructure the convertible subordinated
notes due in April 2007 and September 2010 and be forced into bankruptcy.
In
the event of a default, the holders of our secured convertible notes have the
right to foreclose on substantially all of our assets, which could force us
to
curtail or cease our business operations.
The
holders of our Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase or prepay all
of
the outstanding Convertible Notes under certain circumstances. We may not have
sufficient cash reserves to repurchase the Convertible Notes at such time,
which
would cause an event of default under the Convertible Notes and may force us
to
declare bankruptcy.
We
may not successfully commercialize our drug candidates.
Our
drug candidates are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development
of pharmaceutical products based on new technologies and our failure to develop
safe, commercially viable drugs would severely limit our ability to become
profitable or to achieve significant revenues. We may be unable to successfully
commercialize our drug candidates because:
|
·
|
some
or all of our drug candidates may be found to be unsafe or ineffective
or
otherwise fail to meet applicable regulatory standards or receive
necessary regulatory clearances;
|
|
·
|
our
drug candidates, if safe and effective, may be too difficult to develop
into commercially viable drugs;
|
|
·
|
it
may be difficult to manufacture or market our drug candidates on
a large
scale;
|
|
·
|
proprietary
rights of third parties may preclude us from marketing our drug
candidates; and
|
|
·
|
third
parties may market superior or equivalent
drugs.
|
The
success of our research and development activities, upon which we primarily
focus, is uncertain.
Our
primary focus is on our research and development activities and the
commercialization of compounds covered by proprietary biopharmaceutical patents
and patent applications. Research and development activities, by their nature,
preclude definitive statements as to the time required and costs involved in
reaching certain objectives. Actual research and development costs, therefore,
could exceed budgeted amounts and estimated time frames may require extension.
Cost overruns, unanticipated regulatory delays or demands, unexpected adverse
side effects or insufficient therapeutic efficacy will prevent or substantially
slow our research and development effort and our business could ultimately
suffer. We anticipate that we will remain principally engaged in research and
development activities for an indeterminate, but substantial, period of
time.
We
may be unable to successfully develop, market, or commercialize our products
or
our product candidates without establishing new relationships and maintaining
current relationships.
Our
strategy for the research, development and commercialization of our potential
pharmaceutical products may require us to enter into various arrangements with
corporate and academic collaborators, licensors, licensees and others, in
addition to our existing relationships with other parties. Specifically, we
may
seek to joint venture, sublicense or enter other marketing arrangements with
parties that have an established marketing capability or we may choose to pursue
the commercialization of such products on our own. We may, however, be unable
to
establish such additional collaborative arrangements, license agreements, or
marketing agreements as we may deem necessary to develop, commercialize and
market our potential pharmaceutical products on acceptable terms. Furthermore,
if we maintain and establish arrangements or relationships with third parties,
our business may depend upon the successful performance by these third parties
of their responsibilities under those arrangements and relationships.
7
Our
ability to successfully commercialize, and market our product candidates could
be limited if a number of these existing relationships were
terminated.
Furthermore,
our strategy with respect to our polymer platinate program is to enter into
a
licensing agreement with a pharmaceutical company pursuant to which the further
costs of developing a product would be shared with our licensing partner.
Although we have had discussions with potential licensing partners with respect
to our polymer platinate program, to date we have not entered into any licensing
arrangement. We may be unable to execute our licensing strategy for polymer
platinate.
We
may be unable to successfully manufacture our products and our product
candidates in clinical quantities or for commercial purposes without the
assistance of contract manufacturers, which may be difficult for us to obtain
and maintain.
We
have limited experience in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products in
clinical quantities or for commercial purposes and we may not be able to
manufacture any new pharmaceutical products that we may develop. As a result,
we
have established, and in the future intend to establish arrangements with
contract manufacturers to supply sufficient quantities of products to conduct
clinical trials and for the manufacture, packaging, labeling and distribution
of
finished pharmaceutical products if any of our potential products are approved
for commercialization. If we are unable to contract for a sufficient supply
of
our potential pharmaceutical products on acceptable terms, our preclinical
and
human clinical testing schedule may be delayed, resulting in the delay of our
clinical programs and submission of product candidates for regulatory approval,
which could cause our business to suffer. Our business could suffer if there
are
delays or difficulties in establishing relationships with manufacturers to
produce, package, label and distribute our finished pharmaceutical or other
medical products, if any, market introduction and subsequent sales of such
products. Moreover, contract manufacturers that we may use must adhere to
current Good Manufacturing Practices, as required by the FDA. In this regard,
the FDA will not issue a pre-market approval or product and establishment
licenses, where applicable, to a manufacturing facility for the products until
the manufacturing facility passes a pre-approval plant inspection. If we are
unable to obtain or retain third party manufacturing on commercially acceptable
terms, we may not be able to commercialize our products as planned. Our
potential dependence upon third parties for the manufacture of our products
may
adversely affect our ability to generate profits or acceptable profit margins
and our ability to develop and deliver such products on a timely and competitive
basis.
ProLindac™
is manufactured by third parties for our Phase I/II clinical trials.
Manufacturing is ongoing for the current clinical trials. Certain manufacturing
steps are conducted by the Company to enable significant cost savings to be
realized.
We
are subject to extensive governmental regulation which increases our cost of
doing business and may affect our ability to commercialize any new products
that
we may develop.
The
FDA and comparable agencies in foreign countries impose substantial requirements
upon the introduction of pharmaceutical products through lengthy and detailed
laboratory, preclinical and clinical testing procedures and other costly and
time-consuming procedures to establish their safety and efficacy. All of our
drugs and drug candidates require receipt and maintenance of governmental
approvals for commercialization. Preclinical and clinical trials and
manufacturing of our drug candidates will be subject to the rigorous testing
and
approval processes of the FDA and corresponding foreign regulatory authorities.
Satisfaction of these requirements typically takes a significant number of
years
and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the
product. The status of our principal products is as follows:
|
·
|
A
mucoadhesive liquid technology product, MuGard™, has received marketing
approval by the FDA.
|
|
·
|
ProLindac™
is currently in a Phase II trial in Europe and a Phase II trial in
the
US.
|
|
·
|
ProLindac™
has been approved for an additional Phase I trial in the US by the
FDA.
|
|
·
|
Cobalamin™
mediated delivery technology is currently in the pre-clinical
phase.
|
We
also have other products in the preclinical phase.
Due
to the time consuming and uncertain nature of the drug candidate development
process and the governmental approval process described above, we cannot assure
you when we, independently or with our collaborative partners, might submit
a
NDA, for FDA or other regulatory review.
8
Government
regulation also affects the manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceutical
products. Government regulations may delay marketing of our potential drugs
for
a considerable or indefinite period of time, impose costly procedural
requirements upon our activities and furnish a competitive advantage to larger
companies or companies more experienced in regulatory affairs. Delays in
obtaining governmental regulatory approval could adversely affect our marketing
as well as our ability to generate significant revenues from commercial sales.
Our drug candidates may not receive FDA or other regulatory approvals on a
timely basis or at all. Moreover, if regulatory approval of a drug candidate
is
granted, such approval may impose limitations on the indicated use for which
such drug may be marketed. Even if we obtain initial regulatory approvals for
our drug candidates, Access, our drugs and our manufacturing facilities would
be
subject to continual review and periodic inspection, and later discovery of
previously unknown problems with a drug, manufacturer or facility may result
in
restrictions on the marketing or manufacture of such drug, including withdrawal
of the drug from the market. The FDA and other regulatory authorities
stringently apply regulatory standards and failure to comply with regulatory
standards can, among other things, result in fines, denial or withdrawal of
regulatory approvals, product recalls or seizures, operating restrictions and
criminal prosecution.
The
uncertainty associated with preclinical and clinical testing may affect our
ability to successfully commercialize new products.
Before
we can obtain regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of our
potential drugs, the drug candidates will be subject to extensive preclinical
and clinical trials to demonstrate their safety and efficacy in humans.
Preclinical or clinical trials of any of our future drug candidates may not
demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such drug candidates at all or to the
extent necessary to obtain regulatory approvals. In this regard, for example,
adverse side effects can occur during the clinical testing of a new drug on
humans which may delay ultimate FDA approval or even lead us to terminate our
efforts to develop the drug for commercial use. Companies in the biotechnology
industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even
after demonstrating promising results in earlier trials. In particular, polymer
platinate has taken longer to progress through clinical trials than originally
planned. This extra time has not been related to concerns of the formulations
but rather due to the lengthy regulatory process. The failure to adequately
demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a drug candidate under development could
delay or prevent regulatory approval of the drug candidate. A delay or failure
to receive regulatory approval for any of our drug candidates could prevent
us
from successfully commercializing such candidates and we could incur substantial
additional expenses in our attempts to further develop such candidates and
obtain future regulatory approval.
We
may incur substantial product liability expenses due to the use or misuse of
our
products for which we may be unable to obtain insurance
coverage.
Our
business exposes us to potential liability risks that are inherent in the
testing, manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceutical products. These risks
will expand with respect to our drug candidates, if any, that receive regulatory
approval for commercial sale and we may face substantial liability for damages
in the event of adverse side effects or product defects identified with any
of
our products that are used in clinical tests or marketed to the public. We
generally procure product liability insurance for drug candidates that are
undergoing human clinical trials. Product liability insurance for the
biotechnology industry is generally expensive, if available at all, and as
a
result, we may be unable to obtain insurance coverage at acceptable costs or
in
a sufficient amount in the future, if at all. We may be unable to satisfy any
claims for which we may be held liable as a result of the use or misuse of
products which we have developed, manufactured or sold and any such product
liability claim could adversely affect our business, operating results or
financial condition.
We
may incur significant liabilities if we fail to comply with stringent
environmental regulations or if we did not comply with these regulations in
the
past.
Our
research and development processes involve the controlled use of hazardous
materials. We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental
laws and regulations related to the use, manufacture, storage, handling and
disposal of such material and certain waste products. Although we believe that
our activities and our safety procedures for storing, using, handling and
disposing of such materials comply with the standards prescribed by such laws
and regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these
materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such accident, we
could be held liable for any damages that result and any such liability could
exceed our resources.
9
Intense
competition may limit our ability to successfully develop and market commercial
products.
The
biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are intensely competitive and
subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our competitors in the
United States and elsewhere are numerous and include, among others, major
multinational pharmaceutical and chemical companies, specialized biotechnology
firms and universities and other research institutions.
The
following products may compete with polymer platinate:
•
Cisplatin, marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the originator of the drug, and
several generic manufacturers;
•
Carboplatin, marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb in the US; and
•
Oxaliplatin, marketed exclusively by Sanofi-Aventis.
The
following companies are working on therapies and formulations that may be
competitive with our polymer platinate:
• Antigenics
and Regulon are developing liposomal platinum formulations;
• Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals and GPC Biotech are developing oral platinum
formulations;
• Poniard
Pharmaceuticals is developing both iv and oral platinum
formulations;
• Nanocarrier
and Debio are developing micellar nanoparticle platinum formulations;
and
• American
Pharmaceutical Partners, Cell Therapeutics, Daiichi, and Enzon are developing
alternate drugs in combination with polymers and other drug delivery
systems.
Companies
working on therapies and formulations that may be competitive with our vitamin
mediated drug delivery system are Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor (acquired
by
Johnson & Johnson), Endocyte, GlaxoSmithKline, Imclone and Xoma which are
developing targeted monoclonal antibody therapy.
Amgen,
Carrington Laboratories, CuraGen Corporation, Cytogen Corporation, Endo
Pharmaceuticals, , MGI Pharma, Nuvelo, Inc. and OSI Pharmaceuticals are
developing products to treat mucositis that may compete with our mucoadhesive
liquid technology.
BioDelivery
Sciences International, Biovail Corporation, Cellgate, CIMA Labs, Inc., Cytogen
Corporation, Depomed Inc., Emisphere Technologies, Inc., Eurand, Flamel
Technologies, Nobex and Xenoport are developing products which compete with
our
oral drug delivery system.
Many
of these competitors have and employ greater financial and other resources,
including larger research and development, marketing and manufacturing
organizations. As a result, our competitors may successfully develop
technologies and drugs that are more effective or less costly than any that
we
are developing or which would render our technology and future products obsolete
and noncompetitive.
In
addition, some of our competitors have greater experience than we do in
conducting preclinical and clinical trials and obtaining FDA and other
regulatory approvals. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining
FDA
or other regulatory approvals for drug candidates more rapidly than we do.
Companies that complete clinical trials, obtain required regulatory agency
approvals and commence commercial sale of their drugs before their competitors
may achieve a significant competitive advantage. Drugs resulting from our
research and development efforts or from our joint efforts with collaborative
partners therefore may not be commercially competitive with our competitors'
existing products or products under development.
Our
ability to successfully develop and commercialize our drug candidates will
substantially depend upon the availability of reimbursement funds for the costs
of the resulting drugs and related treatments.
The
successful commercialization of, and the interest of potential collaborative
partners to invest in the development of our drug candidates, may depend
substantially upon reimbursement of the costs of the resulting drugs and related
treatments at acceptable levels from government authorities, private health
insurers and other organizations, including health maintenance organizations,
or
HMOs. Limited reimbursement for the cost of any drugs that we develop may reduce
the demand for, or price of such drugs, which would hamper our ability to obtain
collaborative partners to commercialize our drugs, or to obtain a sufficient
financial return on our own manufacture and commercialization of any future
drugs.
The
market may not accept any pharmaceutical products that we successfully
develop.
The
drugs that we are attempting to develop may compete with a number of
well-established drugs manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical
companies. The degree of market acceptance of any drugs developed by us will
depend on a number of factors, including the establishment and demonstration
of
the clinical efficacy and safety of our drug candidates, the potential advantage
of our drug candidates over existing therapies and the reimbursement policies
of
government and third-party payers. Physicians, patients or the medical community
in general may not accept or use any drugs that we may develop independently
or
with our collaborative partners and if they do not, our business could
suffer.
10
Trends
toward managed health care and downward price pressures on medical products
and
services may limit our ability to profitably sell any drugs that we may
develop.
Lower
prices for pharmaceutical products may result from:
|
·
|
third-party
payers' increasing challenges to the prices charged for medical products
and services;
|
|
·
|
the
trend toward managed health care in the United States and the concurrent
growth of HMOs and similar organizations that can control or significantly
influence the purchase of healthcare services and products;
and
|
|
·
|
legislative
proposals to reform healthcare or reduce government insurance
programs.
|
The
cost containment measures that healthcare providers are instituting, including
practice protocols and guidelines and clinical pathways, and the effect of
any
healthcare reform, could limit our ability to profitably sell any drugs that
we
may successfully develop. Moreover, any future legislation or regulation, if
any, relating to the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and
reimbursement, may cause our business to suffer.
We
may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and proprietary
rights.
Our
success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain U.S. and foreign patent
protection for our drug candidates and processes, preserve our trade secrets
and
operate our business without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties.
Legal standards relating to the validity of patents covering pharmaceutical
and
biotechnological inventions and the scope of claims made under such patents
are
still developing and there is no consistent policy regarding the breadth of
claims allowed in biotechnology patents. The patent position of a biotechnology
firm is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions.
We
cannot assure you that any existing or future patents issued to, or licensed
by,
us will not subsequently be challenged, infringed upon, invalidated or
circumvented by others. As a result, although we, together with our
subsidiaries, are either the owner or licensee to 13 U.S. patents and to 9
U.S.
patent applications now pending, and 4 European patents and 12 European patent
applications, we cannot assure you that any additional patents will issue from
any of the patent applications owned by, or licensed to, us. Furthermore, any
rights that we may have under issued patents may not provide us with significant
protection against competitive products or otherwise be commercially viable.
Our
patents for the following technologies expire in the years and during the date
ranges indicated below:
|
·
|
Mucoadhesive
technology in 2021,
|
|
·
|
ProLindac™
in 2021,
|
|
·
|
Cobalamin
mediated technology between 2007 and
2019
|
In
addition to issued patents, we have a number of pending patent applications.
If
issued, the patents underlying theses applications could extend the patent
life
of our technologies beyond the dates listed above.
Patents
may have been granted to third parties or may be granted covering products
or
processes that are necessary or useful to the development of our drug
candidates. If our drug candidates or processes are found to infringe upon
the
patents or otherwise impermissibly utilize the intellectual property of others,
our development, manufacture and sale of such drug candidates could be severely
restricted or prohibited. In such event, we may be required to obtain licenses
from third parties to utilize the patents or proprietary rights of others.
We
cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such licenses on acceptable
terms, if at all. If we become involved in litigation regarding our intellectual
property rights or the intellectual property rights of others, the potential
cost of such litigation, regardless of the strength of our legal position,
and
the potential damages that we could be required to pay could be
substantial.
Our
business could suffer if we lose the services of, or fail to attract, key
personnel.
We
are highly dependent upon the efforts of our senior management and scientific
team, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, Stephen R. Seiler.
The loss of the services of one or more of these individuals could delay or
prevent the achievement of our research, development, marketing, or product
commercialization objectives. While we have employment agreements with Stephen
R. Seiler, David P. Nowotnik, PhD our Senior Vice President Research and
Development, and Stephen B. Thompson, our Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, their employment may be terminated by them or us at any time. Mr.
Seiler’s, Dr. Nowotnik's and Mr. Thompson’s agreements expire within one year
and are extendable each year
11
on
the anniversary date. We do not have employment contracts with our other key
personnel. We do not maintain any "key-man" insurance policies on any of our
key
employees and we do not intend to obtain such insurance. In addition, due to
the
specialized scientific nature of our business, we are highly dependent upon
our
ability to attract and retain qualified scientific and technical personnel.
In
view of the stage of our development and our research and development programs,
we have restricted our hiring to research scientists and a small administrative
staff and we have made only limited investments in manufacturing, production,
sales or regulatory compliance resources. There is intense competition among
major pharmaceutical and chemical companies, specialized biotechnology firms
and
universities and other research institutions for qualified personnel in the
areas of our activities, however, and we may be unsuccessful in attracting
and
retaining these personnel.
An
investment in our common stock may be less attractive because it is not traded
on a recognized public market.
Our
common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, or OTCBB since June 5, 2006.
From February 1, 2006 until June 5, 2006 we traded on the “Pink Sheets” after
our common stock was de-listed from trading on AMEX. The OTCBB and Pink Sheets
are viewed by most investors as a less desirable, and less liquid, marketplace.
As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to purchase, dispose of
or
obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our common stock.
Our
common stock is subject to Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 under the Exchange Act,
which imposes certain sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell
our
common stock to persons other than established customers and "accredited
investors" (as defined in Rule 501(c) of the Securities Act). For transactions
covered by this rule, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability
determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser's written
consent to the transaction prior to the sale. This rule adversely affects the
ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and purchasers of our common
stock to sell their shares of our common stock.
Additionally,
our common stock is subject to SEC regulations applicable to "penny stock."
Penny stock includes any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market price
of
less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. The regulations
require that prior to any non-exempt buy/sell transaction in a penny stock,
a
disclosure schedule proscribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market
must be delivered by a broker-dealer to the purchaser of such penny stock.
This
disclosure must include the amount of commissions payable to both the
broker-dealer and the registered representative and current price quotations
for
our common stock. The regulations also require that monthly statements be sent
to holders of penny stock that disclose recent price information for the penny
stock and information of the limited market for penny stocks. These requirements
adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock.
Ownership
of our shares is concentrated in the hands of a few investors which could limit
the ability of our other stockholders to influence the direction of the
company.
SCO
Capital Partners LLC, Larry N. Feinberg (Oracle Partners LP, Oracle
Institutional Partners LP and Oracle Investment Management Inc.), and Jeffrey
B.
Davis each beneficially owned approximately 74.1%, 26.4%, and 14.9%,
respectively, of our common stock as of April 30, 2007. Accordingly,
they collectively may have the ability to significantly influence or determine
the election of all of our directors or the outcome of most corporate actions
requiring stockholder approval. They may exercise this ability in a manner
that
advances their best interests and not necessarily those of our other
stockholders.
Provisions
of our charter documents could discourage an acquisition of our company that
would benefit our stockholders and
may have the effect of entrenching, and making it difficult to remove,
management.
Provisions
of our Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws and Stockholders Rights Plan may
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of the Company,
even
if a change in control would benefit our stockholders. In particular, shares
of
our preferred stock may be issued in the future without further stockholder
approval and upon such terms and conditions, and having such rights, privileges
and preferences, as our Board of Directors may determine, including, for
example, rights to convert into our common stock. The rights of the holders
of
our common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the
rights of the holders of any of our preferred stock that may be issued in the
future. The issuance of our preferred stock, while providing desirable
flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate
purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party
to
acquire control of us. This could limit the price that certain investors might
be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and discourage
these investors from acquiring a majority of our common stock. Further, the
existence of these corporate governance provisions could have the effect of
entrenching management and making it more difficult to change our
management.
Substantial
sales of our common stock could lower our stock price.
12
The
market price for our common stock could drop as a result of sales of a large
number of our presently outstanding shares or
shares that we may issue or be obligated to issue in the future.
All of the 3,535,358 shares of our common stock that are outstanding as of
April
30, 2007, are unrestricted and freely tradable or tradable pursuant to a resale
registration statement or under Rule 144 of the Securities Act or are covered
by
a registration rights agreement.
Failure
to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Effective
internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports.
If
we cannot provide reliable financial reports, our operating results could be
harmed. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation.
While
we continue to evaluate and improve our internal controls, we cannot be certain
that these measures will ensure that we implement and maintain adequate controls
over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to
implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in
their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail
to
meet our reporting obligations.
Failure
to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could cause
investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could
have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
The
selling stockholders intend to sell their shares of common stock in the market,
which sales may cause our stock price to decline.
The
selling stockholders intend to sell in the public market 9,298,170 shares of
our
common stock being registered in this offering. That means that up to 9,298,170
shares may be sold pursuant to this registration statement. Such sales may
cause
our stock price to decline. Our officers and directors and our shareholders
who
are significant shareholders, as defined by the SEC, will continue to be subject
to the provisions of various insider trading and rule 144
regulations.
The
price you pay in this offering will fluctuate and may be higher or lower than
the prices paid by other people participating in this
offering.
The
price
in this offering will fluctuate based on the prevailing market price of our
common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board. Accordingly, the price you pay in this
offering may be higher or lower than the prices paid by other people
participating in this offering.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that involve risks and uncertainties.
These statements include, without limitation, statements relating to
uncertainties associated with research and development activities, clinical
trials, our ability to raise capital, the timing of and our ability to achieve
regulatory approvals, dependence on others to market our licensed products,
collaborations, future cash flow, the timing and receipt of licensing and
milestone revenues, the future success of our marketed products and products
in
development, our sales projections, and the sales projections of our licensing
partners, our ability to achieve licensing milestones, our ability to continue
as a going concern, anticipated payments to be received from Uluru, anticipated
product approvals and timing thereof, product opportunities, clinical trials
and
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) applications, as well as our drug
development strategy, our clinical development organization expectations
regarding our rate of technological developments and competition, our plan
not
to establish an internal marketing organization, our expectations regarding
minimizing development risk and developing and introducing technology, the
terms
of future licensing arrangements, our ability to secure additional financing
for
our operations and our expected cash burn rate. These statements relate to
future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “expects,” “plans,” “could,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,”
“predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms or other
comparable terminology. We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered
by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements in these sections. The
forward-looking information is based on various factors and was derived using
numerous assumptions.
13
Forward-looking
statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements
due to a number of factors, including those set forth below under “Risk Factors”
and elsewhere in this Prospectus. The factors set forth above under “Risk
Factors” and other cautionary statements made in this Prospectus should be read
and understood as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements
wherever they appear in this Prospectus. The forward-looking statements
contained in this Prospectus represent our judgment as of the date of this
Prospectus. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on such statements.
Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes
available or other events occur in the future.
This
prospectus relates to shares of our common stock that may be offered and sold
from time to time by certain selling security holders. There will be no proceeds
to us from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering.
We
will
receive the proceeds from the exercise of warrants if payment of the exercise
price is made in cash. All such proceeds will be used for general corporate
purposes.
The
prices at which the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus may
actually be sold will be determined by the prevailing public market price for
shares of common stock or by negotiations in private transactions.
The
following table presents information regarding the selling security holders.
The
selling security holders are the entities who have assisted in or provided
financing to us. A description of each selling security holder's relationship
to
us and how each selling security holder acquired the shares to be sold in this
offering is detailed in the information immediately following this
table.
|
Selling
Security Holder
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned Before Offering
|
Percentage
of Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned Before
Offering
|
Shares
to be Sold in the Offering
|
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned After Offering
|
Percentage
of Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
After Offering (1)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
SCO
Capital Partners, LLC
|
7,982,584
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
|
6,636,362
|
|
1,346,222
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
||
|
Beach
Capital LLC
|
795,454
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
795,454
|
|
-0-
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
||
|
Lake
End Capital LLC
|
1,222,728
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
886,363
|
|
336,365
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
||
|
Mark
J. Alvino
|
55,525
|
1.6
|
%
|
45,454
|
10,071
|
0.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Jeffrey
B. Davis
|
5,820
|
0.2
|
%
|
-0-
|
5,820
|
0.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Howard
Fisher
|
54,545
|
1.5
|
%
|
45,454
|
9,091
|
0.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Cornell
Capital Partners, LP
|
86,083
|
2.4
|
%
|
86,083
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
%
|
||||||
|
Oracle
Partners, LP
|
646,000
|
15.5
|
%
|
504,900
|
141,100
|
3.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Oracle
Institutional Partners, LP
|
176,680
|
4.8
|
%
|
139,700
|
36,980
|
1.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Oracle
Associates LLC
|
136,824
|
3.7
|
%
|
-0-
|
136,824
|
3.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Sam
Oracle Fund, Inc.
|
145,000
|
3.9
|
%
|
132,000
|
13,000
|
0.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Oracle
Offshore, Ltd.
|
32,800
|
0.9
|
%
|
26,400
|
6,400
|
0.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Larry
N. Feinberg
|
3,660
|
0.1
|
%
|
-0-
|
3,660
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total:
|
11,343,703
|
|
76.2
|
%
|
|
9,298,170
|
|
2,045,533
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
||
(1)
Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 3,535,358 shares of common stock
outstanding as of April 30, 2007, together with securities exercisable or
convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of April 30, 2007, for
each stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule
13d-3(d) promulgated by the Commission under the Securities and Exchange Act
of
1934, as amended. Shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options, warrants
and convertible securities are treated as outstanding for computing the
percentage of the person holding such securities but are not treated as
outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Unless otherwise
noted, each person or group identified possesses sole voting and investment
power with respect to shares, subject to community property laws where
applicable. Shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue
of
the right of a person or group to acquire them within 60 days are treated as
outstanding only for purposes of determining the number of and percent owned
by
such person or group.
14
The
following information contains a description of each selling shareholder’s
relationship to us and how each selling shareholder acquired the shares to
be
sold in this offering is detailed below. None of the selling stockholders have
held a position or office, or had any other material relationship, with us,
except as follows:
SCO
Capital Partners LLC and affiliates - Notes and Warrants
On
December 6, 2006, Access entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares
of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes
are
convertible into Access common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per
share, bear interest of 7.5% per annum and are secured by certain assets of
Access. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO and affiliates. Each note may be converted
at
the option of the noteholder or Access under certain circumstances as set forth
in the notes. Each noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares
of common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access
common stock into which such holder’s note is convertible. Each warrant has an
exercise price of $1.32 per share and is exercisable at any time prior to
December 6, 2012.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes are convertible into
Access common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest
of 7.5% per annum and are secured by certain assets of Access. The notes and
warrants were sold in a private placement to a group of accredited investors
led
by SCO and affiliates. Each note may be converted at the option of the
noteholder or Access under certain circumstances as set forth in the notes.
Each
noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares of common stock
of
Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access common stock into
which
such holder’s note is convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32
per share and is exercisable at any time prior to October 24, 2012.
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were
$4.5
million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO and its affiliates. The notes are convertible
into Access common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear
interest of 7.5% per annum and are secured by certain assets of Access. Each
note may be converted at the option of the noteholder or Access under certain
circumstances as set forth in the notes. Each noteholder received a warrant
to
purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total
number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to February 16, 2012.
In
the
event SCO and its affiliates were to convert all of their notes and exercise
all
of their warrants, it would own approximately 70.4% of the voting securities
of
Access.
In
connection with the sale and issuance of notes and warrants, Access entered
into
an investors rights agreement whereby it granted SCO the right to designate
two
individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of Access while the notes are
outstanding, and also granted registration rights with respect to the shares
of
common stock of Access underlying the notes and warrants. SCO designated Jeffrey
B. Davis and Mark J. Alvino to the Board of Directors, and on March 13, 2006
Messrs, Davis and Alvino were appointed to the Board of Directors.
Cornell
Capital Partners Standby Equity Distribution Agreement and Securities Purchase
Agreement
On
March
30, 2005 the Company executed a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (SEDA)
with Cornell Capital Partners. Under the SEDA, the Company could issue and
sell
to Cornell Capital Partners common stock for a total purchase price of up to
$15,000,000. The purchase price for the shares is equal to their market price,
which was defined in the SEDA as 98% of the lowest volume weighted average
price
of the common stock during a specified period of trading days following the
date
notice is given by the Company that it desires to access the SEDA. Further,
we
agreed to pay Cornell Capital Partners 3.5% of the proceeds that we receive
under the Equity Line of Credit. The amount of each draw down was subject to
a
maximum amount of $1,000,000. The terms of the SEDA did not allow us to make
draw downs if the draw down would cause Cornell Capital to own in excess of
9.9%
of our outstanding shares of common stock. Upon closing of the transaction,
Cornell Capital Partners received a one-time commitment fee of 146,500 shares
of
our common stock. On the same date, the Company entered into a Placement Agent
Agreement with Newbridge Securities Corporation, a registered broker-dealer.
Pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, upon closing of the transaction
the
Company paid a one-time placement agent fee of 3,500 shares of common stock.
The
shares issued were valued at $500,000 and recorded as Debt issuance costs and
such costs are amortized as the SEDA is accessed. As of December 31, 2006 we
had
accessed $600,000 of the SEDA and $20,000 of the debt issuance costs were
charged to additional paid-in capital and $384,000 of the issuance costs have
been charged to interest expense. The SEDA expired March 30, 2007.
15
In
addition, on March 30, 2005, the Company executed a Securities Purchase
Agreement with Cornell Capital Partners and Highgate House Funds. Under the
Securities Purchase Agreement, Cornell Capital Partners and Highgate House
Funds
purchased an aggregate of $2,633,000 principal amount of Secured Convertible
Debentures from the Company (net proceeds to the Company of $2,360,000). The
Secured Convertible Debentures accrue interest at a rate of 7% per year and
were
to mature 12 months from the issuance date with scheduled monthly repayment
commencing on November 1, 2005 to the extent that the Secured Convertible
Debenture had not been converted to common stock. The Secured Convertible
Debenture was convertible into the Company's common stock at the holder's option
any time up to maturity at a conversion price equal to $20.00. The Secured
Convertible Debentures were secured by all of the assets of the Company. The
Company had the right to redeem the Secured Convertible Debentures upon 3
business days notice for 110% of the amount redeemed. Pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to the holders an aggregate of 50,000
shares of common stock of the Company. The Secured Convertible Notes were paid
in full on October 12, 2005 in conjunction with the sale of our oral care
assets.
We
have
generally incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception, and
have
expended, and expect to continue to expend in the future, substantial funds
to
complete our planned product development efforts. Since
inception, our expenses have significantly exceeded revenues, resulting in
an
accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2006 of $77,672,000. We
expect
that our capital resources as of March 31, 2007, together with receivables
will
be adequate to fund our current level of operations for seven months, excluding
any obligation to repay the convertible notes and the debt service on the
convertible notes, which at this time we do not have the ability to
pay.
We
cannot assure you that
we
will ever be able to generate significant product revenue or achieve or sustain
profitability. We currently do not have the cash resources to repay our debt
obligations due in April and September 2007. Either through conversion of our
debt to equity or our financing plan through the sales of equity are expected
to
provide the resources to repay such notes.
Oracle
Partners LP Convertible Notes
On
November 9, 2005 the Company announced the restructuring and partial
repayment of our 7.0% convertible promissory notes due September 13, 2005.
Oracle Partners LP and its affiliates, holders of $4 million worth of
convertible notes, agreed to amend their notes to a new maturity date, June
12,
2007, with the conversion price being reduced from $27.50 per share to $5.00
per
share. In addition, the Company may cause a mandatory conversion of the notes
into common stock if the common stock trades at a price of at least 1.5 times
the conversion price for a minimum number of trading days. There is also a
provision to allow for a minimum price for conversion in the event of a change
of control of the Company. This modification resulted in the Company recording
additional debt discount of $2.1 million, which will be accreted to interest
expense to the revised maturity date.
DILUTION
The
common stock to be sold by the selling shareholders is common stock that is
currently issued and outstanding or is issuable on exercise of warrants that
have already been issued. Accordingly, there will be no dilution to our existing
shareholders.
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
We
are
registering the shares of common stock on behalf of the selling security
holders. Sales of shares may be made by selling security holders, including
their respective donees, transferees, pledgees or other successors-in-interest
directly to purchasers or to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or through
agents. Sales may be made from time to time on the OTC Bulletin Board, any
other
exchange or market upon which our shares may trade in the future, in the
over-the-counter market or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time
of
sale, at prices related to market prices, or at negotiated or fixed prices.
The
shares may be sold by one or more of, or a combination of, the
following:
|
·
|
a
block trade in which the broker-dealer so engaged will attempt to
sell the
shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block
as
principal to facilitate the transaction (including crosses in which
the
same broker acts as agent for both sides of the
transaction);
|
|
·
|
purchases
by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by such broker-dealer,
including resales for its account, pursuant to this
prospectus;
|
|
·
|
ordinary
brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker solicits
purchases;
|
16
|
·
|
through
options, swaps or derivatives;
|
|
·
|
in
privately negotiated transactions;
|
|
·
|
in
making short sales or in transactions to cover short sales;
and
|
|
·
|
put
or call option transactions relating to the
shares.
|
The
selling security holders may effect these transactions by selling shares
directly to purchasers or to or through broker-dealers, which may act as agents
or principals. These broker-dealers may receive compensation in the form of
discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling security holders and/or
the purchasers of shares for whom such broker-dealers may act as agents or
to
whom they sell as principals, or both (which compensation as to a particular
broker-dealer might be in excess of customary commissions). The selling security
holders have advised us that they have not entered into any agreements,
understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding
the sale of their securities.
The
selling security holders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers
or other financial institutions. In connection with those transactions, the
broker-dealers or other financial institutions may engage in short sales of
the
shares or of securities convertible into or exchangeable for the shares in
the
course of hedging positions they assume with the selling security holders.
The
selling security holders may also enter into options or other transactions
with
broker-dealers or other financial institutions which require the delivery of
shares offered by this prospectus to those broker-dealers or other financial
institutions. The broker-dealer or other financial institution may then resell
the shares pursuant to this prospectus (as amended or supplemented, if required
by applicable law, to reflect those transactions).
The
selling security holders and any broker-dealers that act in connection with
the
sale of shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of Section
2(11) of the Securities Act of 1933, and any commissions received by
broker-dealers or any profit on the resale of the shares sold by them while
acting as principals may be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions
under the Securities Act. The selling security holders may agree to indemnify
any agent, dealer or broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving
sales of the shares against liabilities, including liabilities arising under
the
Securities Act. We have agreed to indemnify each of the selling security holders
and each selling security holder has agreed, severally and not jointly, to
indemnify us against some liabilities in connection with the offering of the
shares, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act.
The
selling security holders will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements
of the Securities Act. We have informed the selling security holders that the
anti-manipulative provisions of Regulation M promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 may apply to their sales in the market.
Selling
security holders also may resell all or a portion of the shares in open market
transactions in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act, provided they
meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of Rule 144.
Upon
being notified by a selling security holder that a material arrangement has
been
entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block trade,
special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase
by a broker or dealer, we will file a supplement to this prospectus, if required
pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing:
|
·
|
the
name of each such selling security holder and of the participating
broker-dealer(s);
|
|
·
|
the
number of shares involved;
|
|
·
|
the
initial price at which the shares were
sold;
|
|
·
|
the
commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to the
broker-dealer(s), where applicable;
|
|
·
|
that
such broker-dealer(s) did not conduct any investigation to verify
the
information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus;
and
|
|
·
|
other
facts material to the transactions.
|
In
addition, if required under applicable law or the rules or regulations of the
Commission, we will file a supplement to this prospectus when a selling security
holder notifies us that a donee or pledgee intends to sell more than 500 shares
of common stock. We are paying all expenses and fees customarily paid by the
issuer in connection with the registration of the shares. The selling security
holders will bear all brokerage or underwriting discounts or commissions paid
to
broker-dealers in connection with the sale of the shares.
17
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Overview
We
are an
emerging biopharmaceutical company developing products for use in the treatment
of cancer, the supportive care of cancer, and other disease states. Our product
for the management of oral mucositis, MuGard™, has received marketing clearance
by the FDA as a device. Our lead clinical development program for the drug
candidate ProLindac™ (formerly known as AP5346) is in Phase II clinical testing.
Access also has other advanced drug delivery technologies including
Cobalamin™-mediated oral drug delivery and targeted delivery.
Together
with our subsidiaries, we have proprietary patents or rights to one approved
technology for marketing and three drug delivery technology
platforms:
•
MuGard™ (mucoadhesive liquid technology),
•
synthetic polymer targeted delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated oral delivery, and
•
Cobalamin-mediated targeted delivery.
All
shares and per share information reflect a one for five reverse stock split
effected June 5, 2006.
Since
our
inception, we have devoted our resources primarily to fund our research and
development programs. We have been unprofitable since inception and to date
have
received limited revenues from the sale of products. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to generate sufficient product revenues to attain profitability
on a sustained basis or at all. We expect to incur losses for the next several
years as we continue to invest in product research and development, preclinical
studies, clinical trials and regulatory compliance. As of December 31, 2006,
our
accumulated deficit was $77,672,000.
On
April 26, 2007, Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Access”) and SCO
Capital Partners LLC and affiliates (“SCO”) agreed to extend the maturity date
of an aggregate of $6,000,000 of 7.5% convertible notes to June 11, 2007 from
April 27, 2007. On April 24, 2007, Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Access")
and
Oracle Partners LP and affiliates agreed to extend the maturity date of an
aggregate of $4,015,000 of 7.7% convertaible notes to June 12, 2007 from April
28, 2007.
On
April
19, 2007, we announced we had entered into an agreement to acquire Somanta
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, upon
consummation of the acquisition, Somanta’s preferred and common shareholders
would receive an aggregate of 1.5 million shares of Access’ common shares which
would represent approximately 13% of the combined company assuming the
conversion of Access’ existing convertible debt under existing terms of
conversion. The closing of the transaction is subject to numerous conditions
including receipt of necessary approvals including approval of Somanta
shareholders. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be consummated
or if consummated that it will be on the terms described herein.
On
December 8, 2006, we amended our 2005 Asset Sale Agreement with Uluru, Inc.
Access received from Uluru an upfront payment of $4.9 million, received an
additional $350,000 on April 9, 2007 and in the future could receive potential
milestones of up to $4.8 million based on Uluru sales. The amendment agreement
included the anniversary payment due October 12, 2006, the early payment of
the
two year anniversary payment, and a payment in satisfaction of certain future
milestones. Access also transferred to Uluru certain patent applications that
Access had previously licensed to Uluru under the 2005 License Agreement. Under
a new agreement, Access has acquired a license from Uluru to utilize the
nanoparticle aggregate technology contained in the transferred patent
applications for subcutaneous, intramuscular, intra-peritoneal and intra-tumoral
drug delivery. Additionally, one future milestone was increased by
$125,000.
On
December 6, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO Capital
Partners LLC (“SCO”) and affiliates.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO and
affiliates.
18
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $4.5
million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO (see further discussion under “Liquidity and
Capital Resources”).
On
October 12, 2005, we sold our oral/topical care business unit to Uluru, Inc,
a
private Delaware corporation, for up to $18.8 million to focus on our
technologies in oncology and oral drug delivery. The products and technologies
sold to Uluru included amlexanox 5% paste (marketed under the trade names
Aphthasol® and Aptheal®), OraDiscTM,
Zindaclin® and Residerm® and all of our assets related to these products. In
addition, we sold to Uluru our nanoparticle hydrogel aggregate technology which
could be used for applications such as local drug delivery and tissue filler
in
dental and soft tissue applications. We received a license from Uluru for
certain applications of the technology. The CEO of Uluru is Kerry P. Gray,
the
former CEO of the Company. In conjunction with the sale transaction, we received
a fairness opinion from a nationally recognized investment banking firm (see
further discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”).
Our
product MuGard™, for the management of mucositis, was approved for marketing by
the FDA under a 510(k) allowance in December 2006. Our focus will be
developing
unique polymer linked cytotoxics for use in the treatment of cancer and other
diseases states. Our lead development product ProLindac™ is in Phase II clinical
testing. The Company also has other advanced drug delivery technologies
including Cobalamin-mediated targeted delivery and oral care drug delivery.
We
do not have any agreements which provide for near term revenues. Our expenses
for salaries and rent are reduced from prior years. Our clinical development
expenses may be higher than previous years.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
Our
total
research spending for continuing operations for the year ended December 31,
2006
was $2,053,000, as compared to $2,783,000 in 2005, a decrease of $730,000.
The
decrease in expenses was the result of Phase II clinical trial start-up costs,
including manufacturing costs for ProLindac™ in 2005 whereas 2006 costs were
primarily clinical trial costs.
Our
total
general and administrative expenses were $2,813,000 for 2006, a decrease of
$1,825,000 over 2005 expenses of $4,638,000, due to lower:
· Salary
expenses due to the separation agreement in 2005 with our former CEO
($909,000);
· Professional
fees for investment strategies and fairness opinions in 2005
($397,000);
· Legal
fees ($313,000);
· Patent
and license fees ($194,000);
· Rent
($113,000);
· Compensation
paid to Chairman in 2005 ($140,000) and
· Other
net
decreases ($41,000).
The
decrease in general and administrative expenses is offset partially by
higher:
· Salary
related costs due to the expensing of stock options ($180,000); and
· Investor/public
relations fees ($102,000).
Depreciation
and amortization was $309,000 in 2006 as compared to $333,000 in 2005, a
decrease of $24,000 due to the lower depreciation expense.
In
2005
we wrote off our goodwill of $1,868,000 following an impairment
analysis.
Our
loss
from operations in 2006 was $5,175,000 as compared to a loss of $9,622,000
in
2005.
Interest
and miscellaneous income was $294,000 for 2006 as compared to $100,000 for
2005,
an increase of $194,000, relating to interest recognized on the Uluru receivable
and higher cash balances in 2006 as compared with 2005.
19
Interest
and other expense was $7,436,000 for 2006 as compared to $2,100,000 for the
same
period in 2005, an increase of $5,336,000. The increase was due to amortization
of the discount of the Secured Convertible Notes and to amortization of the
discount on the extension of a convertible note.
We
received $550,000 less $173,000 tax expense in 2006 in milestone revenues from
our oral care assets that we sold to Uluru, Inc. due to the amended 2005 Asset
Sale Agreement. We had no milestone revenues in 2005.
The
Secured Convertible Notes include warrants and a conversion feature. Until
September 30, 2006 we accounted for the warrants and conversion feature as
liabilities and recorded at fair value. From the date of issuance to September
30, 2006, the fair value of these instruments increased resulting in a net
unrealized loss of $1.1 million. On October 1, 2006, we adopted the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position EITF No.
00-19-2, “Accounting
for Registration Payment Arrangements” (EITF
00-19-2), which requires that contingent obligations to make future payments
under a registration payment arrangement be recognized and measured separately
in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting
for Contingencies.”
Under
previous guidance, the fair value of the warrant was recorded as a current
liability in our balance sheet, due to a potential cash payment feature in
the
warrant. The current liability was marked-to-market at each quarter end, using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the change being recorded to
general and administrative expenses. Under the new guidance in EITF 00-19-2,
as
we believe the likelihood of such a cash payment to not be probable, have not
recognized a liability for such obligations. Accordingly, a cumulative-effect
adjustment of $1.4 million was made as of October 1, 2006 to accumulated
deficit, representing the difference between the initial value of this warrant
and its fair value as of this date and recorded to equity.
Net
loss
for 2006 was $12,874,000, or $3.65 basic and diluted loss per common share
compared with a loss of $1,700,000, or a $0.53 basic and diluted loss per common
share, for 2005.
Comparison
of Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
Our
total
research spending for continuing operations for the year ended December 31,
2005
was $2,783,000, as compared to $2,335,000 in 2004, an increase of $448,000.
The
increase in expenses was the result of Phase II start-up costs including
manufacturing and clinical costs for ProLindac™ clinical trials ($674,000) and
other net costs ($20,000) offset by lower salary costs due to cutbacks in
scientific staff ($246,000).
Our
total
general and administrative expenses were $4,638,000 for 2005, an increase of
$1,439,000 over 2004 expenses of $3,199,000, due to:
· Expenses
due to the separation agreement with our former CEO ($909,000);
· Professional
fees for investment banking and financing decisions ($397,000);
· Higher
legal fees due to changes in our convertible debt and legal fees associated
with
merger candidates ($161,000); and
· Royalty
license fee ($150,000).
The
increases in general and administrative expenses are offset by:
· Lower
investor relations costs ($90,000);
· Lower
patent expenses ($61,000); and
· Lower
net
other increases ($27,000).
Depreciation
and amortization was $333,000 in 2005 as compared to $469,000 in 2004, a
decrease of $136,000 due to the impairment of a license which is no longer
effective ($109,000) plus lower depreciation.
In
addition we wrote off our goodwill in 2005 of $1,868,000 following an impairment
analysis.
Our
loss
from continuing operations in 2005 was $9,622,000 as compared to a loss of
$6,003,000 in 2004.
Interest
and miscellaneous income was $100,000 for 2005 as compared to $226,000 for
2004,
a decrease of $126,000, relating to interest income due to lower cash balances
in 2005 as compared with 2004.
20
Interest
and miscellaneous expense was $2,100,000 for 2005 as compared to $1,385,000
for
the same period in 2004, an increase of $715,000. The increase was due to
repayment of the secured convertible notes and contractually accelerated
interest and penalty and due to amortization of the discount on the extension
on
of the convertible note.
Net
loss
for 2005 was $1,700,000, or a $0.53 basic and diluted loss per common share
compared with a loss of $10,238,000, or a $3.38 basic and diluted loss per
common share, for 2004.
Discontinued
Operations
In
October 2005 we sold our oral/topical care business to Uluru, Inc. for a gain
of
$12,891,000 less $4,067,000 tax expense and we closed down our Australian
operations. The loss from our discontinued operations of our oral/topical care
business and our Australian operation was $2,969,000.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
have
funded our operations primarily through private sales of common stock and
convertible notes and our principal source of liquidity is cash and cash
equivalents. Contract research payments, licensing fees and milestone payments
from corporate alliances and mergers have also provided funding for operations.
As
of
December 31, 2006 our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
were
$4,389,000 and our working capital deficit was $5,782,000. Our working capital
at December 31, 2006 represented a decrease of $7,127,000 as compared to our
working capital as of December 31, 2005 of $1,345,000. Our working capital
is
negative reflecting $11.0 million of debt that becomes due prior to December
31,
2007 and $0.6 million of accrued interest payments due by September 13,
2007.
As
of
December 31, 2006, the Company did not have enough capital to achieve its
long-term goals. As of March 27, 2007 the Company had cash and cash equivalents
of approximately $3.2 million.
SCO
Capital Partners LLC - Notes and Warrants
On
December 6, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO Capital
Partners LLC (“SCO”) and affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to
purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total
number shares of Access common stock into which such holder's note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to December 6, 2012.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO and
affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares
of
common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access common
stock into which such holder's note is convertible. Each warrant has an exercise
price of $1.32 per share and is exercisable at any time prior to October 24,
2012.
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $4.5
million after offering costs of approximately $500,000, which are being
amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt. The notes and warrants
were sold in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by
SCO
and its affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number
of
shares of common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of
Access common stock into which such holder's note is convertible. Each warrant
has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is exercisable at any time prior
to
February 16, 2012.
All
the
secured notes mature on June 11, 2007, are convertible into Access common stock
at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest of 7.5% per annum
and are secured by the assets of Access. Each note may be converted at the
option of the noteholder or Access under certain circumstances as set forth
in
the notes.
In
the
event SCO and its affiliates were to convert all of their notes and exercise
all
of their warrants, it would own approximately 74.1% of the voting securities
of
Access. Access may be required to pay in cash, up to 2% per month, as defined,
as liquidated damages for failure to file a registration statement timely as
required by an investor rights agreement.
21
In
connection with the sale and issuance of notes and warrants, Access entered
into
an investors rights agreement whereby it granted SCO the right to designate
two
individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of Access while the notes are
outstanding, and also granted registration rights with respect to the shares
of
common stock of Access underlying the notes and warrants. SCO designated Jeffrey
B. Davis and Mark J. Alvino to the Board of Directors, and on March 13, 2006
Messrs, Davis and Alvino were appointed to the Board of Directors.
Uluru,
Inc. - Sale of Oral/Topical Care Assets
On
December 8, 2006 we amended our 2005 Asset Sale Agreement with Uluru, Inc.
Access received from Uluru an upfront payment of $4.9 million, received an
additional $350,000 on April 9, 2007 and in the future could receive potential
milestones of up to $4.8 million based on Uluru sales. The amendment agreement
included the anniversary payment due October 12, 2006, the early payment of
the
two year anniversary payment, and a payment in satisfaction of certain future
milestones. Access also transferred to Uluru certain patent applications that
Access had previously licensed to Uluru under the 2005 License Agreement. Under
a new agreement, Access has acquired a license from Uluru to utilize the
nanoparticle aggregate technology contained in the transferred patent
applications for subcutaneous, intramuscular, intra-peritoneal and intra-tumoral
drug delivery. Additionally, one future milestone was increased by
$125,000.
On
October 12, 2005, we sold our oral/topical care business unit to Uluru, Inc,
a
private Delaware corporation, for up to $18.6 million to focus on our
technologies in oncology and vitamin targeted drug delivery. The products and
technologies sold to Uluru include amlexanox 5% paste (marketed under the trade
names Aphthasol® and Aptheal®), OraDiscTM,
Zindaclin® and Residerm® and all of our assets related to these products. In
addition, we sold to Uluru our nanoparticle hydrogel aggregate technology which
could be used for applications such as local drug delivery and tissue filler
in
dental and soft tissue applications. We received a license from Uluru for
certain applications of the technology. The CEO of Uluru is Kerry P. Gray,
the
former CEO of the Company. In conjunction with the sale transaction, we received
a fairness opinion from a nationally recognized investment banking
firm.
Uluru
assumed eight employees of the Company, and five employees remained with Access
after the sale transaction. Throughout a transition period agreed to by the
parties, Uluru leased space from the Company at its Dallas, TX
headquarters.
At
the
closing of this agreement we received $8.7 million. Any contingent liabilities
arise in the future relating to our former business could reduce further
receipts.
The
upfront payment of this transaction allowed Access to immediately retire our
$2.6 million of Secured Convertible Notes held by Cornell Capital Partners
and
its affiliate and the various agreements relating to these notes. Such notes
were secured by all of our assets. In addition, the elimination of the
manufacturing and regulatory costs associated with the oral care business,
as
well as required employees for these marketed products and product candidates
reduced our burn rate.
Restructuring
Convertible Notes
On
November 9, 2005 we announced the restructuring and partial repayment of our
7.0% convertible promissory notes due September 13, 2005.
One
holder of $4 million worth of convertible notes (Oracle Partners LP and related
funds) agreed to amend their notes to a new maturity date, June 12, 2007, with
the conversion price being reduced from $27.50 per share to $5.00 per share.
In
addition, the Company may cause a mandatory conversion of the notes into common
stock if the common stock trades at a price of at least 1.5 times the conversion
price for a minimum number of trading days. There is also a provision to allow
for a minimum price for conversion in the event of a change of control of the
Company. This modification resulted in us recording additional debt discount
of
$2.1 million, which will be accreted to interest expense to the revised maturity
date.
Access
was unable to reach a conversion agreement with the second holder of $4 million
worth of notes (Philip D. Kaltenbacher), so settled his claim by paying him
this
amount plus expenses and interest as outlined in the terms of the
note.
The
third
noteholder, holding $5.5 million worth of convertible notes agreed to amend
its
notes to a new maturity date, September 13, 2010 and elected to have the 2005
and 2006 interest of $880,000 to be paid on September 13, 2007 or earlier if
the
Company receives $5.0 million of new funds. The delayed interest will earn
interest at a rate of 10.0%.
22
We
do not
have sufficient funds to repay our convertible notes at their maturity. We
may
not be able to restructure the convertible notes or obtain additional financing
to repay them on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we raise additional
funds
by selling equity securities, the relative equity ownership of our existing
investors would be diluted and the new investors could obtain terms more
favorable than previous investors. A failure to restructure our convertible
notes or obtain additional funding to repay the convertible notes and support
our working capital and operating requirements, could cause us to be in default
of our convertible notes and prevent us from making expenditures that are needed
to allow us to maintain our operations. A failure to restructure our existing
convertible notes or obtain necessary additional capital in the future could
jeopardize our operations.
Cornell
Capital Partners Standby Equity Distribution Agreement and Securities Purchase
Agreement
On
March
30, 2005 the Company executed a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (SEDA)
with Cornell Capital Partners. Under the SEDA, the Company could issue and
sell
to Cornell Capital Partners common stock for a total purchase price of up to
$15,000,000. The purchase price for the shares is equal to their market price,
which was defined in the SEDA as 98% of the lowest volume weighted average
price
of the common stock during a specified period of trading days following the
date
notice is given by the Company that it desires to access the SEDA. Further,
we
agreed to pay Cornell Capital Partners 3.5% of the proceeds that we receive
under the Equity Line of Credit. The amount of each draw down was subject to
a
maximum amount of $1,000,000. The terms of the SEDA did not allow us to make
draw downs if the draw down would cause Cornell Capital to own in excess of
9.9%
of our outstanding shares of common stock. Upon closing of the transaction,
Cornell Capital Partners received a one-time commitment fee of 146,500 shares
of
our common stock. On the same date, the Company entered into a Placement Agent
Agreement with Newbridge Securities Corporation, a registered broker-dealer.
Pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, upon closing of the transaction
the
Company paid a one-time placement agent fee of 3,500 shares of common stock.
The
shares issued were valued at $500,000 and recorded as Debt issuance costs and
such costs are amortized as the SEDA is accessed. As of December 31, 2006 we
had
accessed $600,000 of the SEDA and $20,000 of the debt issuance costs were
charged to additional paid-in capital and $384,000 of the issuance costs have
been charged to interest expense. The SEDA expired March 30, 2007.
In
addition, on March 30, 2005, the Company executed a Securities Purchase
Agreement with Cornell Capital Partners and Highgate House Funds. Under the
Securities Purchase Agreement, Cornell Capital Partners and Highgate House
Funds
purchased an aggregate of $2,633,000 principal amount of Secured Convertible
Debentures from the Company (net proceeds to the Company of $2,360,000). The
Secured Convertible Debentures accrue interest at a rate of 7% per year and
were
to mature 12 months from the issuance date with scheduled monthly repayment
commencing on November 1, 2005 to the extent that the Secured Convertible
Debenture had not been converted to common stock. The Secured Convertible
Debenture was convertible into the Company's common stock at the holder's option
any time up to maturity at a conversion price equal to $20.00. The Secured
Convertible Debentures were secured by all of the assets of the Company. The
Company had the right to redeem the Secured Convertible Debentures upon 3
business days notice for 110% of the amount redeemed. Pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to the holders an aggregate of 50,000
shares of common stock of the Company. The Secured Convertible Notes were paid
in full on October 12, 2005 in conjunction with the sale of our oral care
assets.
We
have
generally incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception, and
have
expended, and expect to continue to expend in the future, substantial funds
to
complete our planned product development efforts. Since
inception, our expenses have significantly exceeded revenues, resulting in
an
accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2006 of $77,672,000. We
expect
that our capital resources as of March 31, 2007, together with receivables
will
be adequate to fund our current level of operations for seven months, excluding
any obligation to repay the convertible notes and the debt service on the
convertible notes, which at this time we do not have the ability to
pay.
We
cannot assure you that
we
will ever be able to generate significant product revenue or achieve or sustain
profitability. We currently do not have the cash resources to repay our debt
obligations due in April and September 2007. Either through conversion of our
debt to equity or our financing plan through the sales of equity are expected
to
provide the resources to repay such notes.
We
plan
to expend substantial funds to conduct research and development programs,
preclinical studies and clinical trials of potential products, including
research and development with respect to our acquired and developed technology.
Our future capital requirements and adequacy of available funds will depend
on
many factors, including:
23
|
·
|
the
successful development and commercialization of ProLindac™, MuGard™ and
our other product candidates;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to convert, repay or restructure our outstanding convertible
notes
and debentures;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to merge with Somanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and integrate
their
assets and programs with ours;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to establish and maintain collaborative arrangements with
corporate partners for the research, development and commercialization
of
products;
|
|
·
|
continued
scientific progress in our research and development
programs;
|
|
·
|
the
magnitude, scope and results of preclinical testing and clinical
trials;
|
|
·
|
the
costs involved in filing, prosecuting and enforcing patent
claims;
|
|
·
|
the
costs involved in conducting clinical
trials;
|
|
·
|
competing
technological developments;
|
|
·
|
the
cost of manufacturing and scale-up;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to establish and maintain effective commercialization arrangements
and activities; and
|
|
·
|
successful
regulatory filings.
|
We
have
devoted substantially all of our efforts and resources to research and
development conducted on our own behalf. The following table summarizes research
and development spending by project category (in thousands), which spending
includes, but is not limited to, payroll and personnel expense, lab supplies,
preclinical expense, development cost, clinical trial expense, outside
manufacturing expense and consulting expense:
|
(in
thousands)
|
Twelve
Months ended
December
31,
|
Inception
To
Date
(1)
|
|||||||||
|
Project
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
|
Polymer
Platinate
(ProLindac™)
|
$
|
2,043
|
$
|
2,653
|
$
|
19,654
|
|||||
|
Mucoadhesive
Liquid
Technology
(MLT)
|
10
|
-
|
1,490
|
||||||||
|
Others
(2)
|
-
|
130
|
5,044
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,053
|
$
|
2,783
|
$
|
26,188
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Cumulative
spending from inception of the Company or project through December
31,
2006.
|
|
(2)
|
The
following projects are among the ones included in this line item:
Vitamin
Mediated Targeted Delivery, carbohydrate targeting, amlexanox cream
and
gel and other related projects.
|
Due
to
uncertainties and certain of the risk factors described above, including those
relating to our ability to successfully commercialize our drug candidates,
our
ability to obtain necessary additional capital to fund operations in the future,
our ability to successfully manufacture our products and our product candidates
in clinical quantities or for commercial purposes, government regulation to
which we are subject, the uncertainty associated with preclinical and clinical
testing, intense competition that we face, market acceptance of our products
and
protection of our intellectual property, it is not possible to reliably predict
future spending or time to completion by project or product category or the
period in which material net cash inflows from significant projects are expected
to commence. If we are unable to timely complete a particular project, our
research and development efforts could be delayed or reduced, our business
could
suffer depending on the significance of the project and we might need to raise
additional capital to fund operations, as discussed in the risk factors above,
including without limitation those relating to the uncertainty of the success
of
our research and development activities and our ability to obtain necessary
additional capital to fund operations in the future. As discussed in such risk
factors, delays in our research and development efforts and any inability to
raise additional funds could cause us to eliminate one or more of our research
and development programs.
We
plan
to continue our policy of investing any available funds in certificates of
deposit, money market funds, government securities and investment-grade
interest-bearing securities. We do not invest in derivative financial
instruments.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America requires
us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during
the reported period. In applying our accounting principles, we must often make
individual estimates and assumptions regarding expected outcomes or
uncertainties. As you might expect, the actual results or outcomes are often
different than the estimated or assumed amounts. These differences are usually
minor and are included in our consolidated financial statements as soon as
they
are known. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated
based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates
inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from
those estimates.
24
Asset
Impairment
On
January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.” Upon
adoption, we performed a transitional impairment test on our recorded intangible
assets that consisted primarily of acquisition related goodwill and license
intangibles. We also performed an annual impairment test in the fourth quarter
of 2005. The analysis compared the Company’s market capitalization with net
asset value resulting in an impairment charge in 2005 of $1,868,000.
Our
intangible assets at December 31, 2006 consist primarily of patents
acquired in acquisitions and licenses which were recorded at fair value on
the
acquisition date. We perform an impairment test on at least an annual basis
or
when indications of impairment exist. At December 31, 2006, Management believes
no impairment of our intangible assets exists.
Based
on
an assessment of our accounting policies and underlying judgments and
uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that
our
consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective
of
us. We do not suggest that other general factors, such as those discussed
elsewhere in this report, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. The impairment test involves
judgment on the part of management as to the value of goodwill, licenses and
intangibles.
Stock
Based Compensation Expense
On
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment,”
(“SFAS
123(R)”), which requires the measurement and recognition of all share-based
payment awards made to employees and directors including stock options based
on
estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting
under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees”
(“APB
25”), for periods beginning in fiscal year 2006. In March 2005, the Securities
and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB
107”) relating to SFAS 123(R). We applied the provisions of SAB 107 in our
adoption of SFAS 123(R).
We
adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006,
the first day of the Company’s 2006 fiscal year. Our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, reflect the impact of SFAS
123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, our
consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated
to
include the impact of SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense recognized
under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately
$248,000. Stock-based compensation expense which would have been recognized
under the fair value based method would have been approximately $750,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2005.
SFAS
123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment
awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the
portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as
expense over the requisite service period in the company’s Statement of
Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for stock-based
awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance
with APB No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation”
(“SFAS
123”). Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense for
stock option grants was recognized because the exercise price of our stock
options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value of
the
underlying stock at the date of grant. In 2005, we did recognize stock
compensation expense for restricted stock awards based on the fair value of
the
underlying stock on date of grant and this expense was amortized over the
requisite service period. There were no restricted stock awards granted in
2006
and therefore no stock compensation expense is recognized in 2006 for these
awards.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized in our Statement of Operations for the first
year ended December 31, 2006 includes compensation expense for share-based
payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31,
2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro
forma provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation expense for the share-based
payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant
date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 is based on awards ultimately
expected to vest and has been reduced for estimated forfeitures, which currently
is nil. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. In the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS
123 for periods prior to fiscal year 2006, forfeitures have been accounted
for
as they occurred.
25
We
use
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (“Black-Scholes”) as its method of
valuation under SFAS 123(R) in fiscal year 2006 and a single option award
approach. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.
Black-Scholes was also previously used for our pro forma information required
under SFAS 123 for periods prior to fiscal year 2006. The fair value of
share-based payment awards on the date of grant as determined by the
Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price as well as other assumptions.
These assumptions include, but are not limited to the expected stock price
volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
evaluating the potential impact of the implementation of SFAS 157 on our
financial position and results of operations.
In
June
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting
for Income Tax Uncertainties”
(FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of
tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be
sustained by the taxing authority. The recently issued literature also provides
guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax
uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. FIN 48 also
includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim
periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded
income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for Access as of
January 1, 2007. Any differences between the amounts recognized in the
balance sheets prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported
after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded
to the beginning balance of retained earnings. We are evaluating the potential
impact of the implementation of FIN 48 on our financial position and
results of operations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Transactions
None
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006 are set forth
below.
|
Payment
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
Less
Than 1 Year
|
1-4
Years
|
|||||||||
|
Long-Term
Debt
Obligations
|
$
|
16,395,000
|
$
|
10,895,000
|
$
|
5,500,000
|
||||||
|
Interest
|
2,422,000
|
1,151,000
|
1,271,000
|
|||||||||
|
Lease
Obligations
|
135,000
|
92,000
|
43,000
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
18,952,000
|
$
|
12,138,000
|
$
|
6,814,000
|
||||||
26
Business
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Access” or the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation. We
are an emerging biopharmaceutical company developing products for use in the
treatment of cancer, the supportive care of cancer, and other disease states.
Our product for the management of oral mucositis, MuGard™, has received
marketing clearance by the FDA as a device. Our lead clinical development
program for the drug candidate ProLindac™ (formerly known as AP5346) is in Phase
II clinical testing. Access also has advanced drug delivery technologies
including Cobalamin™-mediated oral drug delivery and targeted
delivery.
Together
with our subsidiaries, we have proprietary patents or rights to one technology
approved for marketing and three drug delivery technology
platforms:
• MuGard™
(mucoadhesive liquid technology),
•
synthetic polymer targeted delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated oral delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated targeted delivery.
Our
Business
Access
is
a Delaware corporation. We are an emerging biopharmaceutical company developing
products for use in the treatment of cancer, the supportive care of cancer,
and
other disease states. Our product for the management of oral mucositis, MuGard™,
has received marketing clearance by the FDA as a device. Our lead clinical
development program for the drug candidate ProLindac™ (formerly known as AP5346)
is in Phase II clinical testing. Access also has advanced drug delivery
technologies including Cobalamin™-mediated oral drug delivery and targeted
delivery.
Together
with our subsidiaries, we have proprietary patents or rights to one technology
approved for marketing and three drug delivery technology
platforms:
• MuGard™
(mucoadhesive liquid technology),
•
synthetic polymer targeted delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated oral delivery,
•
Cobalamin-mediated targeted delivery.
Products
We
have
used our drug delivery technologies to develop the following products and
product candidates:
ACCESS
DRUG PORTFOLIO
|
Compound
|
|
Originator
|
|
Technology
|
|
Indication
|
|
FDA
Filing
|
|
Clinical
Stage
(1)
|
||
|
Cancer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
MuGard™
|
Access
|
Mucoadhesive
liquid
|
Mucositis
|
510(k)
|
Marketing
clearance
|
|||||||
|
ProLindacTM
(Polymer
Platinate,
AP5346) (2)
|
|
Access
- U London
|
|
Synthetic
polymer
|
|
Cancer
|
|
Clinical
Development(3)
|
|
Phase
II
|
||
|
Oral
Insulin
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Diabetes
|
Research
|
Pre-Clinical
|
|||||||
|
Oral
Delivery System
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Various
|
Research
|
Pre-Clinical
|
|||||||
|
Cobalamin-Targeted
Therapeutics
|
|
Access
|
|
Cobalamin
|
|
Anti-tumor
|
|
Research
|
|
Pre-Clinical
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(1)
For more information, see “Government Regulation” for description of clinical
stages.
27
(2)
Licensed from the School of Pharmacy, The University of London. Subject to
a 1%
royalty and milestone payments on sales.
(3)
Clinical studies being conducted in Europe and US.
Approved
Products
MuGard™
- Mucoadhesive Liquid Technology (MLT)
Mucositis
is a debilitating condition involving extensive inflammation of mouth tissue
that affects annually an estimated 400,000 cancer patients in the United States
undergoing chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Any treatment that would
accelerate healing and/or diminish the rate of appearance of mucositis would
have a significant beneficial impact on the quality of life of these patients
and may allow for more aggressive chemotherapy. We believe the potential
addressable market for a mucositis product could be over $1 billion
world-wide.
Access’
MuGard™ is a viscous polymer solution which provides a coating for the oral
cavity. MuGard™ is dispensed in a ready to use form. A multi-site, randomized
clinical study was performed in the United States testing MuGard™ and MuGard™
containing an anti-inflammatory drug to determine the effect of these products
on the prevention and treatment of mucositis. The data from this trial indicated
that the patients using MuGard™ displayed a lower incidence of mucositis than is
typically seen in the studied population with no additional benefit from the
drug.
The
data
were retrospectively compared with two historical patient databases to evaluate
the potential advantages MuGard™ may represent in the prevention, treatment and
management of mucositis. The patient evaluation was conducted using the oral
mucositis assessment scale, which qualifies the disease severity on a scale
of
0-5. Key highlights of the comparison with the historical patient databases
are
as follows:
•
the average severity of the disease was reduced by approximately
40%;
•
the maximum intensity of the mucositis was approximately 35% lower;
and
•
the median peak intensity was approximately 50% lower.
These
data confirmed that fact that MuGard™ could represent an important advancement
in the management and prevention of mucositis. On September 20, 2006, we
announced that we had submitted a Premarket Notification 510(k) application
to
the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announcing the Company’s
intent to market MuGard™. On December 13, 2006, we announced that we had
received marketing clearance for MuGard™ from FDA for the indication of the
management of oral wounds including mucositis, aphthous ulcers and traumatic
ulcers.
Access
is
currently seeking marketing partners to market MuGard™ in the United States and
in other territories worldwide.
Products
in Development Status
ProLindac™
(Polymer Platinate, AP5346) DACH Platinum
Chemotherapy,
surgery and radiation are the major components in the clinical management of
cancer patients. Chemotherapy serves as the primary therapy for some solid
tumors and metastases and is increasingly used as an adjunct to radiation and
surgery to improve their effectiveness. For chemotherapeutic agents to be
effective in treating cancer patients, however, the agent must reach the target
cells in effective quantities with minimal toxicity in normal
tissues.
The
current optimal strategy for chemotherapy involves exposing patients to the
most
intensive cytotoxic regimens they can tolerate and clinicians attempt to design
a combination of chemotherapeutic drugs, a dosing schedule and a method of
administration to increase the probability that cancerous cells will be
destroyed while minimizing the harm to healthy cells. Notwithstanding
clinicians’ efforts, most current chemotherapeutic drugs have significant
shortcomings that limit the efficacy of chemotherapy. For example, certain
cancers are inherently unresponsive to chemotherapeutic agents. Alternatively,
other cancers may initially respond, but subgroups of cancer cells acquire
resistance to the drug during the course of therapy and the resistant cells
may
survive and cause a relapse. Serious toxicity, including bone marrow
suppression, renal toxicity, neuropathy, or irreversible cardiotoxicity, are
some of the limitations of current anti-cancer drugs that can prevent their
administration in curative doses.
28
Oxaliplatin,
a formulation of DACH platinum, is a chemotherapeutic which was initially
approved in France and in Europe in 1999 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
It is now also being marketed in the United States and is generating worldwide
sales in excess of $2 billion annually. Carboplatin and Cisplatin, two other
approved platinum chemotherapy drugs, are not indicated for the treatment of
metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin, in combination with 5-flurouracil
and
folinic acid (known as the FOLFOX regime) is indicated for the first-line
treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe and the U.S. The colorectal
cancer market is a significant opportunity as there are over 940,000 reported
new cases annually worldwide, increasing at a rate of approximately three
percent per year, and 500,000 deaths.
Currently,
platinum compounds are one of the largest selling categories of chemotherapeutic
agents, with annual sales in excess of $3.0
billion. As is the case with all chemotherapeutic drugs, the use of such
compounds is associated with serious systemic side effects. The drug development
goal therefore is to enhance delivery of the active drug to the tumor and
minimize the amount of active drug affecting normal organs in the
body.
Utilizing
a biocompatible water-soluble polymer HPMA as a drug carrier, Access’ drug
candidate ProLindac™, links DACH platinum to a polymer in a manner which permits
the selective release of active drug to the tumor by several mechanisms,
including taking advantage of the differential pH in tumor tissue compared
to
healthy tissue. The polymer also capitalizes on the biological differences
in
the permeability of blood vessels at tumor sites versus normal tissue. In this
way, tumor selective delivery and platinum release is achieved. The ability
of
ProLindac™ to inhibit tumor growth has been evaluated in more than ten
preclinical models. Compared with the marketed product oxaliplatin, ProLindac™
showed either marked superiority or superiority in most of these models.
Preclinical studies of the delivery of platinum to tumors in an animal model
have shown that, compared with oxaliplatin at equitoxic doses, ProLindac™
delivers in excess of 16 times more platinum to the tumor. An analysis of tumor
DNA, which is the main target for anti-cancer platinum agents, has shown that
ProLindac™ delivers
approximately 14 times more platinum to tumor DNA than oxaliplatin. Results
from
preclinical efficacy studies conducted in the B16 and other tumor models have
also shown that ProLindac™ is superior to oxaliplatin in inhibiting the growth
of tumors. An extensive preclinical package has been developed supporting the
development of ProLindac™.
In
2005
we completed a Phase I multi-center clinical study conducted in Europe, which
enrolled 26 patients. The study was reported at the AACR-NCI-EORTC conference
in
Philadelphia in November 2005. The European trial was designed to identify
the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicities, the pharmacokinetics
of
the platinum in plasma and the possible anti-tumor activity of
ProLindacTM.
The
open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation Phase I study was performed at
two
European centers. ProLindacTM
was
administered as an intravenous infusion over one hour, once a week on days
1, 8
and 15 of each 28-day cycle to patients with solid progressive tumors. We
obtained results in 26 patients with a broad cross-section of tumor types,
with
doses ranging from 80-1,280 mg Pt/m2.
Of
the 26
patients, 10 were not evaluable for tumor response, principally due to
withdrawal from the study prior to completing the required cycle. Of the 16
evaluable patients, 2 demonstrated a partial response, 1 experienced a partial
response based on a biomarker and 4 experienced stable disease. One of the
patients who attained a partial response had a melanoma with lung metastasis;
a
CT scan revealed a tumor decrease of greater than 50%. The other patient who
responded had ovarian cancer; she had a reduction in lymph node metastasis
and
remission of a liver metastasis. The patient who experienced a partial response
based on a biomarker was an ovarian cancer patient for whom CA-125 levels
returned to normal. Also of note, a patient with cisplatin resistant cervical
cancer showed a short lasting significant reduction in lung metastasis after
3
doses. However, due to toxicity, the patient could not be retreated to determine
whether the partial response could be maintained.
We
have
commenced a European Phase II ProLindac™ trial in ovarian cancer patients who
have relapsed after first line platinum therapy. The primary aim of the study
is
to the determine the response rate of ProLindacTM
monotherapy in this patient population. The response rates for other platinum
compounds in this indication are well known, and will be used for comparison.
We
have
provided ProLindacTM
to the
Moores Cancer Center at the University of California, San Diego to conduct
a
Phase II clinical study in patients with head and neck cancer under a
physician-sponsored IND. The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate the
ability of the tumor-targeting polymer system to deliver more platinum to tumors
than can be attained with oxaliplatin, the approved DACH platinum compound.
The
Company has submitted an IND application to the US Food and Drug Administration,
and has received clearance from the agency to proceed with a Phase I clinical
study of ProLindac in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin. The study
is
designed to evaluate the safety of the ProLindac in combination with two
standard drugs used to treat colorectal cancer and to establish a safe dose
for
Phase II clinical studies of this combination in colorectal cancer. The Ccompany
is currently evaluating whether clinical development of ProLindac in this
indication might proceed more rapidly by utilizing an alternative clinical
strategy and/or conducting studies in the US and/or elsewhere in the
world.
29
Research
Projects, Products and Products in Development
Drug
Development Strategy
A
part of
our integrated drug development strategy is to form alliances with centers
of
excellence in order to obtain alternative lead compounds while minimizing the
overall cost of research. The Company does not spend significant resources
on
fundamental biological research but rather focuses on its chemistry expertise
and clinical development. For example, certain of our polymer platinate
technology has resulted in part from a research collaboration with The School
of
Pharmacy, University of London.
Our
strategy is to focus on our polymer therapeutic program for the treatment of
cancer while continuing to develop technologies such as MuGard™ and
Cobalamin-mediated oral drug delivery which could provide us with a revenue
stream in the short term through commercialization or outlicensing to fund
our
longer-term polymer development program. To reduce financial risk and equity
financing requirements, we are directing our resources to the preclinical and
early clinical phases of development. Where the size of the necessary clinical
studies and cost associated with the later clinical development phases are
significant, we plan to co-develop with or to outlicense to marketing partners
our therapeutic product candidates. By forming strategic alliances with
pharmaceutical and/or biotech companies, we believe that our technology can
be
more rapidly developed and successfully introduced into the
marketplace.
We
will
continue to evaluate the most cost-effective methods to advance our programs.
We
will contract certain research and development, manufacturing and manufacturing
scaleup, certain preclinical testing and product production to research
organizations, contract manufacturers and strategic partners. As appropriate
to
achieve cost savings and accelerate our development programs, we will expand
our
internal core capabilities and infrastructure in the areas of chemistry,
formulation, analytical methods development, clinical development, biology
and
project management to maximize product opportunities in a timely manner.
Process
We
begin
the product development effort by screening and formulating potential product
candidates, selecting an optimal active component, developing a formulation,
and
developing the processes and analytical methods. Pilot stability, toxicity
and
efficacy testing are conducted prior to advancing the product candidate into
formal preclinical development. Specialized skills are required to produce
these product candidates utilizing our technology. We have a limited core
internal development capability with significant experience in developing these
formulations, but also depend upon the skills and expertise of our
contractors.
Once
the
product candidate has been successfully screened in pilot testing, our
scientists, together with external consultants, assist in designing and
performing the necessary preclinical efficacy, pharmacokinetic and toxicology
studies required for IND submission. External investigators and scaleup
manufacturing facilities are selected in conjunction with our consultants.
The
initial Phase I and Phase II studies are conducted by institutions and
investigators supervised and monitored by our employees and contract research
organizations. We do not plan to have an extensive clinical development
organization as we plan to have the advance phases of this process conducted
by
a development partner. Should we conduct Phase III clinical studies we expect
to
engage a contract research organization to perform this work.
We
contract with third party contract research organizations to complete our large
clinical trials and for data management of all of our clinical trials.
Generally, we manage the smaller Phase I and II trials ourselves. Currently,
we
have one Phase II trial in process and two Phase II trials planned for this
year
subject to preliminary findings in other trials and our ability to fund such
trials.
With
all
of our product development candidates, we cannot assure you that the results
of
the in vitro or animal studies are or will be indicative of the results that
will be obtained if and when these product candidates are tested in humans.
We
cannot assure you that any of these projects will be successfully completed
or
that regulatory approval of any product will be obtained.
We
expended approximately $2,053,000, $2,783,000 and $2,335,000 on research and
development during the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
30
Scientific
Background
The
ultimate criteria for effective drug delivery is to control and optimize the
localized release of the drug at the target site and rapidly clear the
non-targeted fraction. Conventional drug delivery systems such as controlled
release, sustained release, transdermal systems and others are designed for
delivering active product into the systemic circulation over time with the
objective of improving patient compliance. These systems do not address the
biologically relevant issues such as site targeting, localized release and
clearance of drug. The major factors that impact the achievement of this
ultimate drug delivery goal are the physical characteristics of the drug and
the
biological characteristics of the disease target sites. The physical
characteristics of the drug affect solubility in biological systems, its
biodistribution throughout the body, and its interactions with the intended
pharmacological target sites and undesired areas of toxicity. The biological
characteristics of the diseased area impact the ability of the drug to
selectively interact with the intended target site to allow the drug to express
the desired pharmacological activity.
We
believe our drug delivery technologies are differentiated from conventional
drug
delivery systems in that they seek to apply a disease-specific approach to
improve the drug delivery process with formulations to significantly enhance
the
therapeutic efficacy and reduce toxicity of a broad spectrum of
products.
Core
Drug Delivery Technology Platforms
Our
current drug delivery technology platforms for use in cancer chemotherapy
are:
•
Synthetic Polymer Targeted Drug Delivery Technology;
•
Cobalamin-Mediated Oral Delivery Technology; and
•
Cobalamin-Mediated Targeted Delivery Technology.
Each
of these platforms is discussed below:
Synthetic
Polymer Targeted Drug Delivery Technology
In
collaboration with The School of Pharmacy, University of London, we have
developed a synthetic polymer technology, which utilizes
hydroxypropylmethacrylamide with platinum, designed to exploit enhanced
permeability and retention, or EPR, at tumor sites to selectively accumulate
drug and control drug release. This technology is employed in our lead clinical
program, ProLindac™. Many solid tumors possess vasculature that is
hyperpermeable, or leaky, to macromolecules. In addition to this enhanced
permeability, tumors usually lack effective lymphatic and/or capillary drainage.
Consequently, tumors selectively accumulate circulating macromolecules,
including, for example, up to 10% of an intravenous dose in mice. This effect
has been termed EPR, and is thought to constitute the mechanism of action of
styrene-maleic/anhydride-neocarzinostatin, or SMANCS, which is in regular
clinical use in Japan for the treatment of hepatoma. These polymers take
advantage of endothelial permeability as the drug carrying polymers are trapped
in tumors and then taken up by tumor cells. Linkages between the polymer and
drug can be designed to be cleaved extracellularly or intracellularly. Utilizing
the principles of prodrugs, the drug is essentially inert while attached to
the
polymer, but is released inside the tumor mass while polymer/drug not delivered
to tumors is renally cleared from the body. For example, ProLindac is attached
to a pH-sensitive linker which releases the platinum cytotoxic agent much faster
in the low pH environments found typically outside of tumor cells and within
specific compartments inside of tumor cells. Data generated in animal studies
have shown that the polymer/drug complexes are far less toxic than free drug
alone and that greater efficacy can be achieved. Thus, these polymer complexes
have demonstrated significant improvement in the therapeutic index of
anti-cancer drugs, including, for example, platinum.
Cobalamin-Mediated
Oral Delivery Technology
Oral
delivery is the preferred method of administration of drugs where either
long-term or daily use (or both) is required. However many therapeutics,
including peptide and protein drugs, are poorly absorbed when given orally.
With
more and more peptide and protein based biopharmaceuticals entering the market,
there is an increasing need to develop an effective oral delivery system for
them, as well as for long-standing injected drugs such as insulin.
31
The
difficulty in administering proteins orally is their susceptibility to
degradation by digestive enzymes, their inability to cross the intestinal wall
and their rapid excretion by the body. Over the years, many different
methodologies for making protein drugs available orally have been attempted.
Most of the oral protein delivery technologies involve protecting the protein
degradation in the intestine. More recently, strategies have been developed
that
involve attaching the protein or peptide to a molecule that transports the
protein across the gut wall. However, the field of oral drug delivery of
proteins and peptides has yet to achieve successful commercialization of a
product (although positive results have been achieved in early clinical trials
for some products under development).
Many
pharmaceutically active compounds such as proteins, peptides and cytotoxic
agents cannot be administered orally due to their instability in the
gastrointestinal tract or their inability to be absorbed and transferred to
the
bloodstream. A technology that would allow many of these actives to be taken
orally would greatly enhance their acceptance and value. Several technologies
for the protection of sensitive actives in the gastro-intestinal tract and/or
enhancement of gastro-intestinal absorption have been explored and many have
failed.
Our
proprietary technology for oral drug delivery utilizes the body’s natural
vitamin B12 (VB12) transport system in the gut. The absorption of VB12 in the
intestine occurs by way of a receptor-mediated endocytosis. Initially, VB12
binds to intrinsic factor (IF) in the small intestine, and the VB12-IF complex
then binds to the IF receptor on the surface of the intestine. Receptor-mediated
endocytosis then allows the transport of VB12 across the gut wall. After binding
to another VB12-binding protein, transcobalamin II (TcII), VB12 is transferred
to the bloodstream.
Our
scientists discovered that Cobalamin (analogs of VB12) will still be transported
by this process even when drugs, macromolecules, or nanoparticles are coupled
to
the Cobalamin. Thus Cobalamin serves as a carrier to transfer these
materials from the intestinal lumen to the bloodstream. For drugs and
macromolecules that are stable in the gastro-intestinal tract, the drug or
macromolecule can be coupled directly (or via a linker) to Cobalamin. If the
capacity of the Cobalamin transport system is inadequate to provide an effective
blood concentration of the active, transport can be amplified by attaching
many
molecules of the drug to a polymer, to that Cobalamin is also attached. A
further option, especially for drugs and macromolecules that are unstable in
the
intestine, is to formulate the drug in a nanoparticle which is then coated
with
Cobalamin. Once in the bloodstream, the active is released by diffusion and/or
erosion of the nanoparticle. Utilization of nanoparticles also serves to
‘amplify’ delivery by transporting many molecules at one time due to the
inherently large nanoparticle volume compared with the size of the
drug.
Our
proprietary position in this technology involves the conjugation of Cobalamin
and/or folic acid and/or biotin (or their analogs) to a polymer to which is
also
attached the drug to be delivered, or attached to a nanoparticle in which the
drug is incorporated. Since many molecules of the drug are attached to a single
polymer strand, or are incorporated in a single nanoparticle, disease targeting
is amplified compared to simpler conjugates involving one molecule of the
vitamin with one drug molecule. However, in situations when such a simple
conjugate might be preferred, our patents also encompass these Cobalamin-drug
conjugates.
Cobalamin-Mediated
Targeted Delivery Technology
Most
drugs are effective only when they reach a certain minimum concentration in
the
region of disease, yet are well distributed throughout the body contributing
to
undesirable side effects. It is therefore advantageous to alter the natural
biodistribution of a drug to have it more localized where it is needed. Our
Cobalamin-mediated targeted delivery technology utilizes the fact that in many
diseases where there is rapid growth and/or cell division, the demand for
certain vitamins increases. By coupling the drug to a vitamin analog, the analog
serves as a carrier to increase the amount of drug at the disease site relative
to its normal distribution.
One
application of this technology is in tumor targeting. The use of cytotoxic
drugs
is one of the most common methods for treating a variety of malignancies
including solid and non-solid tumors. The drawbacks of chemotherapeutic
treatments, which include tumor resistance, cancer relapse and toxicity from
severe damage to healthy tissues, has fuelled a scientific quest for novel
treatments that are specifically targeted to malignant cells thus reducing
damage to collateral tissues.
The
design of targeted therapies involves exploitation of the difference between
the
structure and function of normal cells compared with malignant cells.
Differences include the increased levels of surface molecules on cancer cells,
which makes them more sensitive to treatment regimes that target surface
molecules and differences in blood supply within and around tumor cells compared
with normal cells.
Two
basic
types of targeting approaches are utilized, passive tumor targeting and active
tumor targeting.
| • |
passive
tumor targeting involves transporting anti-cancer agents through
the
bloodstream to tumor cells using a “carrier” molecule. Many different
carrier molecules, which can take a variety of forms (micelles,
nanoparticles, liposomes and polymers), are being investigated as
each
provides advantages such as specificity and protection of the anti-cancer
drug from degradation due to their structure, size (molecular weights)
and
particular interactions with tumor cells. Our polymer platinate program
is
a passive tumor targeting
technology.
|
32
| • |
active
tumor targeting involves attaching an additional fragment to the
anticancer drug and the carrier molecule to create a new “targeted” agent
that will actively seek a complementary surface molecule to which
it binds
(preferentially located on the exterior of the tumor cells). The
theory is
that the targeting of the anti-cancer agent through active means
to the
affected cells should allow more of the anti-cancer drug to enter
the
tumor cell, thus amplifying the response to the treatment and reducing
the
toxic effect on bystander, normal
tissue.
|
Examples
of active targeting fragments include antibodies, growth factors and vitamins.
Our scientists have specifically focused on using Cobalamin compounds (analogs
of vitamin B12), but we have also used and have certain intellectual property
protection for the use of folate and biotin which may more effectively target
anti-cancer drugs to solid tumors.
It
has
been known for some time that vitamin B12 and folic acid are essential for
tumor
growth and as a result, receptors for these vitamins are up-regulated in certain
tumors. Vitamin B12 receptor over-expression occurs in breast, lung, leukemic
cells, lymphoma cells, bone, thyroid, colon, prostate and brain cancers and
some
other tumor lines, while folate receptor over-expression occurs in breast,
lung,
ovarian, endometrial, renal, colon, brain and cancers of myeloid hemotopoietic
cells and methotrexate-sensitive tumors.
Patents
We
believe that the value of technology both to us and to our potential corporate
partners is established and enhanced by our broad intellectual property
positions. Consequently, we have already been issued and seek to obtain
additional U.S. and foreign patent protection for products under development
and
for new discoveries. Patent applications are filed with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office and, when appropriate, with the Paris Convention's Patent
Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Countries (most major countries in Western Europe
and
the Far East) for our inventions and prospective products.
One
U.S.
patent has issued and one U.S. patent application and two European patent
applications are under review for our mucoadhesive liquid technology. Our patent
applications cover a
range of
products utilizing our mucoadhesive liquid technology for the management of
the
various phases of mucositis.
Three
U.S. patents and two European patents have issued and one U.S. patent and two
European patent applications are pending for polymer platinum compounds. The
two
patents and patent applications are the result in part of our collaboration
with
The School of Pharmacy, University of London, from which the technology has
been
licensed and include a synthetic polymer, hydroxypropylmethacrylamide
incorporating platinates, that can be used to exploit enhanced permeability
and
retention in tumors and control drug release. The patents and patent
applications include a pharmaceutical composition for use in tumor treatment
comprising a polymer-platinum compound through linkages that are designed to
be
cleaved under selected conditions to yield a platinum which is selectively
released at a tumor site. The patents and patent applications also include
methods for improving the pharmaceutical properties of platinum compounds.
We
have
three
patented Cobalamin-mediated targeted therapeutic technologies:
|
-
|
folate
conjugates of polymer therapeutics, to enhance tumor delivery by
targeting
folate receptors, which are upregulated in certain tumor types with
two
U.S. and two European patent
applications;
|
|
-
|
the
use of vitamin B12 to target the transcobalamin II receptor which
is
upregulated in numerous diseases including cancer, rheumatoid arthritis,
certain neurological and autoimmune disorders with two U.S. patents
and
three U.S. and four European patent applications;
and
|
|
-
|
oral
delivery of a wide variety of molecules which cannot otherwise be
orally
administered, utilizing the active transport mechanism which transports
vitamin B12 into the systemic circulation with six U.S. patents and
two
European patents and one U.S. and one European patent
application.
|
Our
patents for the following technologies expire in the years and during the date
ranges indicated below:
|
·
|
Mucoadhesive
technology in 2021,
|
|
·
|
ProLindac™
in 2021,
|
|
·
|
Cobalamin
mediated technology between 2007 and
2019
|
In
addition to issued patents, we have a number of pending patent applications.
If
issued, the patents underlying theses applications could extend the patent
life
of our technologies beyond the dates listed above.
33
We
have a
strategy of maintaining an ongoing line of patent continuation applications
for
each major category of patentable carrier and delivery technology. By this
approach, we are extending the intellectual property protection of our basic
targeting technology and initial agents to cover additional specific carriers
and agents, some of which are anticipated to carry the priority dates of the
original applications.
Government
Regulation
We
are
subject to extensive regulation by the federal government, principally by the
FDA, and, to a lesser extent, by other federal and state agencies as well as
comparable agencies in foreign countries where registration of products will
be
pursued. Although a number of our formulations incorporate extensively tested
drug substances, because the resulting formulations make claims of enhanced
efficacy and/or improved side effect profiles, they are expected to be
classified as new drugs by the FDA.
The
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and other federal, state and foreign
statutes and regulations govern the testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling,
storage, shipping and record keeping of our products. The FDA has the authority
to approve or not approve new drug applications and inspect research, clinical
and manufacturing records and facilities.
Among
the
requirements for drug approval and testing is that the prospective
manufacturer's facilities and methods conform to the FDA's Code of Good
Manufacturing Practices regulations, which establish the minimum requirements
for methods to be used in, and the facilities or controls to be used during,
the
production process. Such facilities are subject to ongoing FDA inspection to
insure compliance.
The
steps
required before a pharmaceutical product may be produced and marketed in the
U.S. include preclinical tests, the filing of an IND with the FDA, which must
become effective pursuant to FDA regulations before human clinical trials may
commence, numerous phases of clinical testing and the FDA approval of a New
Drug
Application (“NDA”) prior to commercial sale.
Preclinical
tests are conducted in the laboratory, usually involving animals, to evaluate
the safety and efficacy of the potential product. The results of preclinical
tests are submitted as part of the IND application and are fully reviewed by
the
FDA prior to granting the sponsor permission to commence clinical trials in
humans. All trials are conducted under International Conference on
Harmonization, or ICH, good clinical practice guidelines. All investigator
sites
and sponsor facilities are subject to FDA inspection to insure compliance.
Clinical trials typically involve a three-phase process. Phase I, the initial
clinical evaluations, consists of administering the drug and testing for safety
and tolerated dosages and in some indications such as cancer and HIV, as
preliminary evidence of efficacy in humans. Phase II involves a study to
evaluate the effectiveness of the drug for a particular indication and to
determine optimal dosage and dose interval and to identify possible adverse
side
effects and risks in a larger patient group. When a product is found safe,
an
initial efficacy is established in Phase II, it is then evaluated in Phase
III
clinical trials. Phase III trials consist of expanded multi-location testing
for
efficacy and safety to evaluate the overall benefit to risk index of the
investigational drug in relationship to the disease treated. The results of
preclinical and human clinical testing are submitted to the FDA in the form
of
an NDA for approval to commence commercial sales.
The
process of forming the requisite testing, data collection, analysis and
compilation of an IND and an NDA is labor intensive and costly and may take
a
protracted time period. In some cases, tests may have to be redone or new tests
instituted to comply with FDA requests. Review by the FDA may also take
considerable time and there is no guarantee that an NDA will be approved.
Therefore, we cannot estimate with any certainty the length of the approval
cycle.
We
are
also governed by other federal, state and local laws of general applicability,
such as laws regulating working conditions, employment practices, as well as
environmental protection.
Competition
The
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry is characterized by intense
competition, rapid product development and technological change. Competition
is
intense among manufacturers of prescription pharmaceuticals and other product
areas where we may develop and market products in the future. Most of our
potential competitors are large, well established pharmaceutical, chemical
or
healthcare companies with considerably greater financial, marketing, sales
and
technical resources than are available to us. Additionally, many of our
potential competitors have research and development capabilities that may allow
such competitors to develop new or improved products that may compete with
our
product lines.
34
Our
potential products could be rendered obsolete or made uneconomical by the
development of new products to treat the conditions to be addressed by our
developments, technological advances affecting the cost of production, or
marketing or pricing actions by one or more of our potential competitors. Our
business, financial condition and results of operation could be materially
adversely affected by any one or more of such developments. We cannot assure
you
that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future
competitors or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on
our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Academic institutions,
governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations are
also conducting research activities and seeking patent protection and may
commercialize products on their own or with the assistance of major health
care
companies in areas where we are developing product candidates. We are aware
of
certain development projects for products to treat or prevent certain diseases
targeted by us, the existence of these potential products or other products
or
treatments of which we are not aware, or products or treatments that may be
developed in the future, may adversely affect the marketability of products
developed by us.
Our
principal competitors in the polymer area are Cell Therapeutics, Daiichi, Enzon,
Polytherics Ltd, and Inhale which are developing alternate drugs in combination
with polymers. We believe we are the only company conducting clinical studies
in
the polymer drug delivery of platinum compounds. We believe that the principal
current competitors to our polymer targeting technology fall into two
categories: monoclonal antibodies and liposomes. We believe that our technology
potentially represents a significant advance over these older technologies
because our technology provides a system with a favorable pharmacokinetic
profile.
A
number
of companies are developing or may in the future engage in the development
of
products competitive with the Access polymer delivery system. Several companies
are working on targeted monoclonal antibody therapy including Bristol-Myers
Squibb, Centocor (acquired by Johnson & Johnson), GlaxoSmithKline, Imclone
and Xoma. Currently, liposomal formulations being developed by Gilead Sciences
and Alza Corporation (acquired by Johnson & Johnson), are the major
competing intravenous drug delivery formulations that deliver similar drug
substances.
In
the
area of advanced drug delivery, which is the focus of our early stage research
and development activities, a number of companies are developing or evaluating
enhanced drug delivery systems. We expect that technological developments will
occur at a rapid rate and that competition is likely to intensify as various
alternative delivery system technologies achieve similar if not identical
advantages.
Even
if
our products are fully developed and receive required regulatory approval,
of
which there can be no assurance, we believe that our products can only compete
successfully if marketed by a company having expertise and a strong presence
in
the therapeutic area. Consequently, we do not currently plan to establish an
internal marketing organization. By forming strategic alliances with major
and
regional pharmaceutical companies, management believes that our development
risks should be minimized and that the technology potentially could be more
rapidly developed and successfully introduced into the marketplace.
Other
Key Developments
On
April
26, 2007, Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Access”) and SCO Capital Partners LLC
and affiliates (“SCO”) agreed to extend the maturity date of an aggregate of
$6,000,000 of 7.5% convertible notes to June 11, 2007 from April 27, 2007.
On April 24, 2007, Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Access") and Oracle
Partners LP and affiliates agreed to extend the maturity date of an aggregate
of
$4,015,000 of 7.7% convertaible notes to June 12, 2007 from April 28,
2007.
On
April
19, 2007 we announced we had entered into an agreement to acquire Somanta
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, upon
consummation of the acquisition, Somanta’s preferred and common shareholders
would receive an aggregate of 1.5 million shares of Access’ common shares which
would represent approximately 13% of the combined company assuming the
conversion of Access’ existing convertible debt under existing terms of
conversion. The closing of the transaction is subject to numerous conditions
including receipt of necessary approvals including approval of the Somanta
shareholders. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be consummated
or if consummated, that it will be on the terms described herein.
We
have
upcoming maturity dates on our convertible notes. The $6
million of Senior Convertible notes are due June 11, 2007 plus accrued interest;
and the approximately $4.0
million of convertible notes which are due June 12, 2007 including interest;
and
capitalized interest of $880,000. We are currently negotiating with the debt
holders to convert their debt to equity or to extend the terms of their due
dates.
All
shares and per share information reflect a one for five reverse stock split
effected June 5, 2006.
35
On
December 8, 2006 we amended our 2005 Asset Sale Agreement with Uluru, Inc.
Access received from Uluru an upfront payment of $4.9 million, received an
additional $350,000 on April 9, 2007 and in the future could receive potential
milestones of up to $4.8 million based on Uluru sales. The amendment agreement
included the anniversary payment due October 12, 2006, the early payment of
the
two year anniversary payment, and a payment in satisfaction of certain future
milestones. Access also transferred to Uluru certain patent applications that
Access had previously licensed to Uluru under the 2005 License Agreement. Under
a new agreement, Access has acquired a license from Uluru to utilize the
nanoparticle aggregate technology contained in the transferred patent
applications for subcutaneous, intramuscular, intra-peritoneal and intra-tumoral
drug delivery. Additionally, one future milestone was increased by
$125,000.
On
December 6, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO Capital
Partners LLC (“SCO”) and affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to
purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total
number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to December 6, 2012.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO and
affiliates. Each noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares
of
common stock of Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access common
stock into which such holder’s note is convertible. Each warrant has an
exercise price of $1.32 per share and is exercisable at any time prior to
October 24, 2012.
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $4.5
million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO and affiliates. Each noteholder received a
warrant to purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75%
of
the total number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to February 16, 2012.
All
the
secured notes mature on June 11, 2007, are convertible into Access common stock
at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest of 7.5% per annum
and are secured by substantially all of the assets of Access. Each note may
be
converted at the option of the noteholder or Access under certain circumstances
as set forth in the notes.
In
the event SCO and its affiliates were to convert all of their notes and exercise
all of their warrants, they would own approximately 74.1% of the voting
securities of Access. Access may be required to pay in cash, up to 2% per month,
as defined, as liquidated damages for failure to file a registration statement
timely as required by an investor rights agreement.
In
connection with the sale and issuance of notes and warrants, Access entered
into
an investors rights agreement whereby it granted SCO the right to designate
two
individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of Access while the notes are
outstanding, and also granted registration rights with respect to the shares
of
common stock of Access underlying the notes and warrants. SCO designated Jeffrey
B. Davis and Mark J. Alvino to the Board of Directors, and on March 13, 2006
Messrs, Davis and Alvino were appointed to the Board of Directors.
On
October 12, 2005, we sold our oral/topical care business unit to Uluru, Inc,
a
private Delaware corporation, for up to $18.8 million to focus on our
technologies in oncology and oral drug delivery. The products and technologies
sold to Uluru included amlexanox 5% paste (marketed under the trade names
Aphthasol® and Aptheal®), OraDiscTM,
Zindaclin® and Residerm® and all of our assets related to these products. In
addition, we sold to Uluru our nanoparticle hydrogel aggregate technology which
could be used for applications such as local drug delivery and tissue filler
in
dental and soft tissue applications. We received a license from Uluru for
certain applications of the technology. The CEO of Uluru is Kerry P. Gray,
the
former CEO of the Company. In conjunction with the sale transaction, we received
a fairness opinion from a nationally recognized investment banking
firm.
At
the
closing of the agreement we received $8.7 million. In addition, due to the
Amended Asset Sale Agreement in December 2006, we received $4.9 million and
received an additional $350,000 on April 9, 2007 for the first and second
anniversary payments and settlement of certain milestones. We recorded $550,000
less $173,000 tax expense as revenue from the discontinued operations in
2006.
36
We
were
incorporated in Wyoming in 1974 as Chemex Corporation, and in 1983 we changed
our name to Chemex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We changed our state of incorporation
from Wyoming to Delaware on June 30, 1989. In 1996 we merged with Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a private Texas corporation, and changed our name to
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Our principal executive office is located at 2600
Stemmons Freeway, Suite 176, Dallas, Texas 75207; our telephone number is (214)
905-5100.
Employees
As
of
April 30, 2007, we had nine full time employees, four of whom have advanced
scientific degrees. We have never experienced employment-related work stoppages
and consider that we maintain good relations with our personnel. In addition,
to
complement our internal expertise, we have contracts with scientific
consultants, contract research organizations and university research
laboratories that specialize in various aspects of drug development including
clinical development, regulatory affairs, toxicology, process scale-up and
preclinical testing.
Web
Availability
We
make
available free of charge through our web site, www.accesspharma.com, our annual
reports on Form 10-K and other reports required under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such
reports are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”). These documents are also available through the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov certain of our corporate governance policies, including the charters
for the Board of Directors’ audit, compensation and nominating and corporate
governance committees and our code of ethics, corporate governance guidelines
and whistleblower policy. We will provide to any person without charge, upon
request, a copy of any of the foregoing materials. Any such request must be
made
in writing to Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2600 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 176,
Dallas, TX 75207 attn: Investor Relations.
37
We
maintain one facility of approximately 9,000 square feet for administrative
offices and laboratories in Dallas, Texas. We have a lease agreement for the
facility, which terminates in December 2007. Adjacent space may be available
for
expansion which we believe would accommodate growth for the foreseeable
future.
We
believe that our existing properties are suitable for the conduct of our
business and adequate to meet our present needs.
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND
FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
Grant
Thornton LLP ("Grant Thornton") was previously the principal accounts for
the
Company. On September 15, 2006, Grant Thornton resigned as our independent
registered public accounting firm.
In
connection with the audits of fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004 and
the subsequent interim period through September 15, 2006, (i) there have
been no
disagreements with Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles
or
practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure,
which
disagreement(s), if not resolved to Grant Thornton's satisfaction, would
have
caused Grant Thornton to make reference to the subject matter of the
disagreement(s) in connection with its reports for such year, and (ii)
there
were no "reportable events" as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v)
of
Regulation S-K. However, as reported in the Company's Form 10-K for the
year
ended December 31, 2005, Grant Thornton has communicated to the Company's
audit
committee the existence of
material weaknesses in our system of internal control over financial reporting
related to the inadequacy of staffing and a lack of segregation of
duties.
Grant
Thornton's reports did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of
opinion,
but the 2005 report was modified to include an explanatory paragraph related
to
uncertainties about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.
Effective
September 20, 2006, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the engagement of Whitley Penn
LLP (“Whitley Penn”) as its independent registered public accounting firm to
audit the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.
On October 2, 2006, Whitley Penn formally advised the Company that it was
accepting the position as the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for the year ending December 31, 2006.
During
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the interim period through
October 2, 2006, Whitley Penn has not been engaged as an independent registered
public accounting firm to audit either the financial statements of the
Company
or any of its subsidiaries, nor has the Company or anyone acting on its
behalf
consulted with Whitley Penn regarding: (i) the application of accounting
principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or
the type
of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements;
or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or reportable
event as
set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
The
following table sets forth the Directors, Executive Officers, and Key Employees
of the Company along with their respective ages and positions and is as
follows:
| Name | Age | Title | |||
| Jeffrey B. Davis | 44 | Chairman of the Board | |||
| Stephen R. Seiler | 51 | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | |||
| Rosemary Mazanet, M.D., Ph.D. | 51 | Vice Chairman | |||
| Esteban Cvitkovic, M.D. | 57 | Vice Chairman - Europe | |||
| Mark J. Ahn, Ph.D. | 44 | Director | |||
| Mark J. Alvino | 39 | Director | |||
| J. Michael Flinn | 73 | Director | |||
| Stephen B. Howell, M.D. | 62 | Director | |||
| David P. Luci | 40 | Director | |||
| Herbert H. McDade, Jr. | 80 | Director | |||
| John J. Meakem, Jr. | 70 | Director | |||
| David P. Nowotnik, Ph.D. |
58
|
Senior Vice President Research & Development | |||
| Phillip S. Wise | 48 | Vice President, Business Development & Strategy | |||
| Stephen B. Thompson | 53 | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary |
No
director, Officer, affiliate or promoter of the Company has, within the past
five years, filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted in or been the subject
of any pending criminal proceedings, or is any such person the subject or any
order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal
securities laws.
The
following is a brief account of the business experience during the past five
years of each director and executive officer of the Company, including principal
occupations and employment during that period and the name and principal
business of any corporation or other organization in which such occupation
and
employment were carried on.
38
Mr.
Jeffrey B. Davis became
a director in March 2006 as a designee of SCO Capital Partners LLC. Mr.
Davis is
Chairman of the Board and a member of the Compensation Committee of the
Board.
Mr. Davis currently serves as President of SCO Financial Group LLC. Prior
to
joining SCO Securities LLC, Mr. Davis served as Senior Vice President and
Chief
Financial Officer of HemaSure, Inc., a publicly traded development stage
healthcare technology company. Prior to that, Mr. Davis was Vice President,
Corporate Finance, at Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, both in the U.S. and Europe.
Mr.
Davis also served in senior marketing and product management positions
at
AT&T Bell Laboratories, where he was also a member of the technical staff.
Prior to that, Mr. Davis was involved in marketing and product management
at
Philips Medical Systems North America. Mr. Davis is currently on the board
of
MacroChem Corporation, Uluru, Inc. and Virium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
private
biotechnology company. Mr. Davis served previously on the board of Bioenvision,
Inc. Mr. Davis holds a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Boston University
and
an M.B.A. degree from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Mr.
Stephen R. Seiler has
been
our President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director since January
2007.
Until recently, Mr. Seiler had been Acting Chief Executive Officer of Effective
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and advising other companies in the healthcare field.
From
2001 until 2004 he was Chief Executive Officer of Hybridon, Inc. (now Idera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). Mr. Seiler was Executive Vice President, Planning,
Investment & Development at Elan Corporation plc from 1995 until 2001. He
also worked as an investment banker at Paribas Capital Markets in both
London
and New York from 1991 to 1995 where he was founder and head of Paribas’
pharmaceutical investment banking group.
Rosemary
Mazanet, M.D. serves
as
Chief Executive Officer of Breakthrough Therapeutics, LLC, a privately held
development stage biotechnology company. From May 2005 to January 2007 she
served as our Acting Chief Executive Officer. From June 1998 to February 2004,
Dr. Mazanet served as Chief Scientific Officer and a General Partner of Oracle
Partners, L.P., a healthcare investment firm. Dr. Mazanet also serves as an
independent director at GTx, Inc (Nasdaq: GTXI), Aksys, Ltd. and is a trustee
at
the University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine. Prior to joining Oracle,
Dr.
Mazanet was the Director of Clinical Research at Amgen, Inc. She has over 20
years experience in the pharmaceutical industry, and was trained as a Medical
Oncologist/Hematologist in the Harvard Medical System, and holds an M.D. and
Ph.D. from University of Pennsylvania.
Dr.
Esteban Cvitkovic
became a
director in February 2007. Recently, the oncology-focused CRO, Cvitkovic &
Associés Consultants (CAC), founded by Dr. Cvitkovic 11 years ago and which he
developed from a small oncology consultancy to a full-service CRO, was sold
to
AAIPharma to become AAIOncology. Dr. Cvitkovic is currently a Senior Medical
Consultant to AAIOncology. In addition, he maintains a part-time academic
practice including teaching at the hospitals Beaujon and St Louis in Paris.
Dr.
Cvitkovic is Scientific President of the FNAB, a foundation devoted to the
furthering of personalised cancer treatments. Together with a small number
of
collaborators he has recently co-founded Oncoethix, a biotech company focused
on
licensing and co-development of anti-cancer molecules. Dr. Cvitkovic has
authored more than 200 peer-reviewed articles and 600 abstracts focused on
therapeutic oncology development. His international career includes staff and
academic appointments at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York),
Columbia Presbyterian (New York), Instituto Mario Negri (Milan), Institut
Gustave Roussy (Villejuif), Hôpital Paul Brousse (Villejuif) and Hôpital St.
Louis (Paris).
Dr.
Mark J. Ahn
became a
director in September 2006. Dr. Ahn is President
and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Hana
Biosciences, Inc. since November 2003. Prior to joining Hana, from December
2001
to November 2003, he served as Vice President, Hematology and corporate officer
at Genentech, Inc. where he was responsible for commercial and clinical
development of the Hematology franchise. From February 1991 to February 1997
and
from February 1997 to December 2001, Dr. Ahn was employed by Amgen and
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, respectively, holding a series of positions of
increasing responsibility in strategy, general management, sales &
marketing, business development, and finance. He has also served as an officer
in the U.S. Army. Dr. Ahn is a Henry Crown Fellow at the Aspen Institute,
founder of the Center for Non-Profit Leadership, a director of TransMolecular,
Inc., a privately held biotechnology company focused on neuroncology, and a
member of the Board of Trustees for the MEDUNSA (Medical University of South
Africa) Trust. Dr. Ahn received a B.A. in History and an M.B.A. in Finance
from
Chaminade University. He was a graduate fellow in Economics at Essex University,
and has a Ph.D. in Business Administration from the University of South
Australia.
Mr.
Mark J. Alvino became
a
director in March 2006 as a designee of SCO Capital Partners LLC. Mr.
Alvino currently works as Managing Director for SCO Financial Group LLC. He
is
currently on the board of directors of MacroChem Corporation. He previously
worked at Feinstein Kean Healthcare, an Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide
Company. There he was Senior Vice President, responsible for managing both
investor and corporate communications programs for many private and public
companies and acted as senior counsel throughout the agency's network of
offices. Prior to working at FKH, Mr. Alvino served as Vice President of
Investor Relations and managed the New York Office of Allen & Caron, Inc.,
an investor relations agency. His base of clients included medical devices,
biotechnology, and e-healthcare companies. Mr. Alvino also spent several years
working with Wall Street brokerages including Ladenburg, Thallman & Co. and
Martin Simpson & Co.
Mr.
J. Michael Flinn
has
served as one of our directors since 1983. Mr. Flinn was Chairman of the Board
from 2004 until 2006 and was previously a member of the Compensation Committee
of the Board. From 1970 to 2000, he was an investment counselor and a consultant
to the Operations Group of United Asset Management. He served as a security
analyst in the area of healthcare and natural resources. From 1970 to 1995
he
was a principal and Chairman with the investment counseling firm of Sirach
Capital Management, Inc. He assisted in the management of pension, profit
sharing, individual, corporate and foundation accounts totaling over $8.0
billion. He serves as a board member of Lonesome Dove Petroleum. He previously
has served on hospital and other healthcare boards.
Stephen
B. Howell, M.D.
has
served as one of our directors since 1996. Dr. Howell is a member of the
Compensation Committee of the Board. Dr. Howell is a Professor of Medicine
at
the University of California, San Diego, and director of the Cancer Pharmacology
Program of the UCSD Cancer Center. Dr. Howell is a recipient of the Milken
Foundation prize for his contributions to the field of cancer chemotherapy.
He
has served on the National Research Council of the American Cancer Society
and
is on the editorial boards of multiple medical journals. Dr. Howell founded
DepoTech, Inc. and served as a member of its board of directors from 1989 to
1999. Dr. Howell served on the board of directors of Matrix Pharmaceuticals
from
2000 to 2002. Dr. Howell received his A.B. at the University of Chicago and
his
M.D. from Harvard Medical School.
39
Mr.
David P. Luci
has
served as one of our directors since January 2007. Mr. Luci is Executive Vice
President of Bioenvision, Inc. He has also served as Bioenvision’s chief
financial officer, general counsel and corporate secretary since July 2004,
after serving as director of finance, general counsel and corporate secretary
since July 2002. From September 1994 to July 2002, Mr. Luci served as a
corporate associate at Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP (New York
office). Prior to that, Mr. Luci served as a senior auditor at Ernst & Young
LLP (New York office). Mr. Luci is a certified public accountant. He holds
a
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a concentration in
accounting from Bucknell University and a J.D. (cum laude) from Albany Law
School of Union University.
Mr.
Herbert H. McDade, Jr.
has
served as one of our directors since 1988 and was previously a member of the
Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. McDade was Chairman of the Board until
2004. In February 1989, he was elected Vice-Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer and served in such positions until 1996. In June 1989, he
was
elected Chairman of the Board and Treasurer in addition to his responsibilities
as Chief Executive Officer, and from 1990 to January 1996 he was our President.
In addition, he also serves on the board of Discovery Laboratories, Inc. From
1986 to 1987 he served as Chairman of the board of directors and President
of
Armour Pharmaceutical Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rorer Group, Inc. Prior
to 1986 he served for approximately 13 years in various executive positions
at
Revlon, Inc., including from 1979 to 1986, as President of the International
Division of the Revlon Health Care Group. He was also previously associated
for
twenty years in various executive capacities with The Upjohn
Company.
Mr.
John J. Meakem, Jr. has
been
one of our directors since 2001. Mr. Meakem is also a member of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board and a member of the Audit and
Finance Committee of the Board. Mr. Meakem is a private investor with portfolio
holdings in innovative companies with a particular focus on healthcare. Most
recently Mr. Meakem served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. from 1991 to 2000. Prior
to
1991, he was Corporate Executive Vice President of Combe, Inc. and President
of
Combe North America. Prior to 1970, Mr. Meakem was with Vick Chemical Company,
a
division of Richardson Merrell Drug Corporation, for ten years as Vice President
of Marketing, New Products & Acquisitions.
David
P. Nowotnik, Ph.D.
has
been Senior Vice President Research and Development since January 2003 and
was
Vice President Research and Development from 1998. From 1994 until 1998, Dr.
Nowotnik had been with Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the position of Senior
Director, Product Development and was responsible for a team of scientists
developing polymeric controlled-release drug delivery systems. From 1988 to
1994
he was with Bristol-Myers Squibb researching and developing technetium
radiopharmaceuticals and MRI contrast agents. From 1977 to 1988 he was with
Amersham International leading the project which resulted in the discovery
and
development of Ceretec.
Mr.
Phillip S. Wise
has been
our Vice President Business Development since June 2006. Mr. Wise was Vice
President of Commercial and Business Development for Enhance Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and Ardent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2000 until 2006. Prior to that time
he was with Glaxo Wellcome, from 1990 to 2000 in various
capacities.
Mr.
Stephen B. Thompson
has been
Vice President since 2000 and our Chief Financial Officer since 1996. From
1990
to 1996, he was Controller and Administration Manager of Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., a private Texas corporation. Previously, from 1989 to 1990, Mr. Thompson
was Controller of Robert E. Woolley, Inc., a hotel real estate company where
he
was responsible for accounting, finances and investor relations. From 1985
to
1989, he was Controller of OKC Limited Partnership, an oil and gas company,
where he was responsible for accounting, finances and SEC reporting. Between
1975 and 1985 he held various accounting and finance positions with Santa Fe
International Corporation.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
In
October, 2004 the Company adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
for Employees, Executive Officers and Directors, applicable to all employees,
management, and directors, designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest
and
ethical conduct, full, fair and accurate disclosure, compliance with laws,
prompt internal reporting and accountability to adherence to the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics.
40
The
following executive compensation disclosure reflects compensation awarded to,
earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other executive
officers listed below whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006. We refer to our Chief Executive Officer and these
other executive officers as our "named executive officers" elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
Stock
|
Option
|
All
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
and Principal Position (7)
|
Year |
Salary ($)
|
Bonus
|
Awards ($)
|
Awards ($)
|
Compensation |
Total ($)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
(1)
|
($)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Rosemary
Mazanet(5)
Acting
CEO
|
2006
2005
|
$ |
357,385
217,500
|
$
|
100,000
30,000
|
$
|
-
-
|
$
|
81,464
168,468
|
$
|
2,594
1,297
|
$
|
541,443
248,797
|
|||||||||||
|
Kerry
P. Gray(6)
Former
President and CEO
|
2005
|
|
$
|
133,332
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
3,505
|
$
|
136,837
|
||||||||||
|
David
P. Nowotnik, Ph.D.
Senior
Vice President Research
and
Development
|
2006
2005
|
|
$
|
253,620
250,710
|
$
|
20,000
25,408
|
$
|
-
24,154
|
$
|
40,732
67,619
|
$
|
7,152
7,094
|
$
|
321,504
374,985
|
||||||||||
|
Phillip
S. Wise(7)
Vice
President, Business
Development
|
2006
|
$
|
116,667
|
$
|
25,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
40,732
|
$
|
358
|
$
|
182,757
|
|||||||||||
|
Stephen
B. Thompson
Vice
President,
Chief
Financial Officer
|
2006
2005
|
$
|
154,080
152,310
|
$
|
20,000
15,435
|
$
|
-
14,704
|
$
|
40,732
42,262
|
$
|
4,508
4,455
|
$
|
219,320
229,166
|
|||||||||||
____________________
|
(1)
|
Includes
amounts deferred under our 401(k)
Plan.
|
|
(2)
|
There
were no stock awards grants in 2006 and no restricted stock outstanding
at
December 31, 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
The
value listed in the above table represents the fair value of the
options
granted in prior years that was recognized in 2006 under FAS 123R.
Fair
value is calculated as of the grant date using a Black-Sholes
option-pricing model. The determination of the fair value of share-based
payment awards made on the date of grant is affected by our stock
price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective
variables. Our assumptions in determining fair value are described
in note
10 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December
31,
2006, included in our Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.
|
|
(4)
|
Amounts
reported for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 consist of: (i) amounts we
contributed to our 401(k) Plan with respect to each named individual,
(ii)
amounts we paid for group term life insurance for each named individual,
and (iii) for Mr. Gray, premiums paid by us each year for life insurance
for Mr. Gray.
|
|
(5)
|
Amounts
listed in 2006 and 2005 for Dr. Mazanet indicate compensation paid
to her
in connection with her services as our Acting CEO commencing on May
11,
2005.
|
|
(6)
|
Amounts
listed in 2005 for Mr. Gray indicate compensation paid to him in
connection with his services as our President and CEO through May
10,
2005. In addition to such amounts listed in the table above, Mr.
Gray also
received a total of $333,333 and $488,335 per the terms of his Separation
Agreement in 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
(7)
|
Phillip
S. Wise became our Vice President Business Development June 1,
2006.
|
|
(8)
|
Stephen
R. Seiler became our President and Chief Executive Officer effective
January 1, 2007 and is not included in this
table.
|
Employment
Agreements
President
and Chief Executive Officer
We
were
party to an employment arrangement with Stephen R. Seiler, who was named by
the
Board as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and director,
effective as of January 4, 2007 (the "Effective Date"). Mr. Seiler is paid
an
annual salary of $350,000 and was granted stock options to purchase 500,000
shares of Common Stock with an exercise price equal to the closing price of
Common Stock on the day preceding the Effective Date. Mr. Seiler's options
vest
25% on January 4, 2008 and monthly thereafter over a 36 month period. The stock
options are granted under the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the
2007
Special Stock Option Plan. Mr. Seiler is entitled to similar employee benefits
as the Company's other executive officers. Under certain circumstances relating
to a change of control of the Company, Mr. Seiler may be entitled to receive
a
payment equal to his annual salary, acceleration of options and extension of
health care benefits.
41
We
were
party to an employment arrangement with Rosemary Mazanet, our former Acting
Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Mazanet reported directly to, and was subject
to
the direction of, the Board. Dr. Mazanet salary was set at $25,000 monthly.
Dr.
Mazanet was granted a non-qualified stock option of 6,000 shares of Common
Stock, vesting over a six month period. In November 2005, Dr. Mazanet was also
granted 50,000 options under the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. 14,000
options vested on grant, the rest vest upon attainment of preset milestones.
Dr.
Mazanet also received similar employee benefits as the Company's other executive
officers, D&O insurance coverage and received a signing bonus of $30,000.
The Board granted Dr. Mazanet an additional 200,000 options in
2006.
Senior
Vice President
We
are
party to an employment agreement with David P. Nowotnik, Ph.D., our Senior
Vice
President, Research and Development, which renews automatically for successive
one-year periods, with the current term extending until November 16, 2007.
Under
this agreement, Dr. Nowotnik is currently entitled to receive an annual base
salary of $253,620, subject to adjustment by the Board. Dr. Nowotnik is eligible
to participate in all of our employee benefit programs available to executives.
Dr. Nowotnik is also eligible to receive:
|
·
|
a
bonus payable in cash and Common Stock related to the attainment
of
reasonable performance goals specified by the
Board;
|
|
·
|
stock
options at the discretion of the
Board;
|
|
·
|
long-term
disability insurance to provide compensation equal to at least $60,000
annually; and
|
|
·
|
term
life insurance coverage of $254,000.
|
Dr.
Nowotnik is entitled to certain severance benefits in the event that we
terminate his employment without cause or if Dr. Nowotnik terminates his
employment following a change of control. In the event that we terminate the
employment agreement for any reason, other than for cause, Dr. Nowotnik will
receive his salary for six months. We will also continue benefits for such
period. In the event that Dr. Nowotnik's employment is terminated within six
months following a change in control or by Dr. Nowotnik upon the occurrence
of
certain events following a change in control, Dr. Nowotnik will receive twelve
months salary and his stock options will become immediately exercisable. We
will
also continue payment of benefits for such period.
Vice
President - Chief Financial Officer
We
are
party to an employment agreement with Stephen B. Thompson, our Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer, which renews automatically for successive one-year
periods. Mr. Thompson is entitled to an annual base salary of $154,080, subject
to adjustment by the Board. The employment agreement also grants Mr. Thompson
similar employee benefits as the Company's other executive officers. Mr.
Thompson is also eligible to receive:
|
·
|
a
bonus payable in cash and Common Stock related to the attainment
of
reasonable performance goals specified by the
Board;
|
|
·
|
stock
options at the discretion of the
Board;
|
|
·
|
long-term
disability insurance to provide compensation equal to at least $90,000
annually; and
|
|
·
|
term
life insurance coverage of
$155,000.
|
Mr.
Thompson is entitled to certain severance benefits in the event that we
terminate his employment without cause or if Mr. Thompson terminates his
employment following a change of control. In the event that we terminate the
employment agreement for any reason, other than cause, Mr. Thompson will receive
salary for six months. We will also continue benefits for such period. In the
event that Mr. Thompson's employment is terminated within six months following
a
change of control or by Mr. Thompson upon the occurrence of certain events
following a change in control, Mr. Thompson will receive twelve months salary
and his stock options will become immediately exercisable. We will also continue
payment of benefits for such period.
2006
Equity Incentive Plan
Our
board
of directors adopted and our stockholders approved our 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan in May 2005. As of December 31, 2006, options to purchase 802,672 shares
of
common stock were outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $1.04
per
share and 197,328 shares remained available for future grant.
42
Purpose.
The
purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain the best available personnel for
positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive
to
employees and directors of and advisers and consultants to the Company. The
purpose of the proposed amendment is to provide the Company with additional
capacity to award stock options to existing personnel and to attract qualified
new employees, directors, advisers and consultants through grants of stock
options.
Administration.
The
Plan
is administered by the Compensation Committee. During 2006, the Compensation
Committee was composed of four directors, Jeffrey B. Davis, Herbert H. McDade,
Jr., J. Michael Flinn and Max Link. The Compensation Committee presently is
composed of Jeffrey B. Davis and Stephen B. Howell, MD. Subject to the
provisions of the Plan, the Compensation Committee has discretion to determine
when awards are made, which employees are granted awards, the number of shares
subject to each award and all other relevant terms of the awards. The
Compensation Committee also has broad discretion to construe and interpret
the
Plan and adopt rules and regulations thereunder. The Compensation Committee
approved the 2007 Special Stock Option Plan and the grant of 450,000 options
to
our new President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2007.
Eligibility.
Awards
may be granted to persons who are employees of the Company whether or not
officers or members of the Board and directors of or advisers or consultants
to
the Company or of any of the Company’s subsidiaries. No election by any such
person is required to participate in the Plan.
Shares
Subject to the Plan. The
shares issued or to be issued under the Plan are shares of Common Stock, which
may be newly issued shares or shares held in the treasury or acquired in the
open market. Previously, no more than 1,000,000 shares could be issued under
the
Plan. The foregoing limit is subject to adjustment for stock dividends, stock
splits or other changes in the Company’s capitalization.
Stock
Options. The
Compensation Committee in its discretion may issue stock options which qualify
as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified
stock options. The Compensation Committee will determine the time or times
when
each stock option becomes exercisable, the period within which it remains
exercisable and the price per share at which it is exercisable, provided that
no
incentive stock option shall be exercised more than 10 years after it is granted
and no other options shall be exercised more than 10 years and one day after
it
is granted, and further provided that the exercise price of any incentive stock
option shall not be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on
the
date of grant. The closing price of the Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board
on March 30, 2007 was $6.45 per share.
Payment
for shares purchased upon exercise of an option must be made in full in cash
or
check, by payment through a broker in accordance with Regulation T of the
Federal Reserve Board or by such other mode of payment as the Committee may
approve, including payment in whole or in part in shares of the Common Stock,
when the option is exercised. No option is transferable except by will or the
laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations
order, as defined by the Code or in Title I of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Notwithstanding
any other provision of the Plan, each non-employee director is also entitled
to
receive options to purchase 2,500 shares of Common Stock on the date of each
annual meeting of stockholders and options to purchase 25,000 shares of Common
Stock when he or she is first appointed as a director.
Tax
Considerations.
The
following is a brief and general discussion of the federal income tax rules
applicable to awards under the Plan. With respect to an incentive stock option,
an employee will generally not be taxed at the time of grant or exercise,
although exercise of an incentive option will give rise to an item of tax
preference that may result in an alternative minimum tax. If the employee holds
the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option until at least
one year after issuance and two years after the option grant, he or she will
have long-term capital gain (or loss) based on the difference between the amount
realized on the sale or disposition and his or her option price. If these
holding periods are not satisfied, then upon disposition of the shares the
employee will recognize ordinary income equal, in general, to the excess of
the
fair market value of the shares at time of exercise over the option price,
plus
capital gain in respect of any additional appreciation. With respect to a
non-qualified option, an employee will not be taxed at the time of grant; upon
exercise, he or she will generally realize compensation income to the extent
the
then fair market value of the stock exceeds the option price. The Company will
generally have a tax deduction to the extent that, and at the time that, an
employee realizes compensation income with respect to an award.
43
Any
tax
deductions the Company may be entitled to in connection with awards under the
Plan may be limited by the $1 million limitation under Section 162(m) of the
Code on compensation paid to any of our chief executive officer or other named
officers. This limitation is further discussed in the Compensation Committee
Discussion on Executive Compensation.
For
purposes of this summary, we have assumed that no award will be considered
“deferred
compensation”
as that
term is defined for purposes of the federal tax rules governing nonqualified
deferred compensation arrangements, Section 409A of the Code, or, if any award
were considered to any extent to constitute deferred compensation, its terms
would comply with the requirements of that legislation (in general, by limiting
any flexibility in the time of payment). For example, the award of a
non-qualified stock option with an exercise price which is less than the market
value of the stock covered by the option would constitute deferred compensation.
If an award includes deferred compensation, and its terms do not comply with
the
requirements of these tax rules, then any deferred compensation component of
the
award will be taxable when it is earned and vested (even if not then payable)
and the recipient will be subject to a 20% additional tax.
In
all
cases, recipients of awards should consult their tax advisors regarding the
tax
treatment of any awards received by them.
401(k)
Plan
We
maintain a defined contribution employee retirement plan, or 401(k) plan, for
our employees. Our executive officers are also eligible to participate in the
401(k) plan on the same basis as our other employees. The plan is intended
to
qualify as a tax-qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code. The plan provides that each participant may contribute up to the statutory
limit, which is $15,500 for calendar year 2007. Participants who are 50 years
or
older can also make "catch-up" contributions, which in calendar year 2007 may
be
up to an additional $5,000 above the statutory limit. Under the plan, each
participant is fully vested in his or her deferred salary contributions,
including any matching contributions by us, when contributed. Participant
contributions are held and invested by the participants in the plan's investment
options. The plan also permits us to make discretionary contributions and
matching contributions, subject to established limits and a vesting schedule.
In
2006, we matched 100% of participant contributions up to the first two percent
of eligible compensation. We match participant contributions at the first four
percent of eligible compensation in 2007.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2006
| Name |
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexcersised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexcersised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Exercise
Date
|
||
|
Rosemary
Mazanet(2)
|
50,000
39,796
6,000
|
150,000
10,204
|
-
|
0.63
5.45
12.50
|
08/17/06
11/02/05
05/11/05
|
||
|
Kerry
P. Gray(3)
|
20,000
28,000
32,000
32,000
20,000
100,000
32,000
32,000
|
-
|
-
|
29.25
11.50
18.65
34.38
27.50
12.50
10.00
15.00
|
01/23/04
05/19/03
03/22/02
11/20/00
10/12/00
03/01/00
07/20/99
06/18/98
|
||
|
David
P. Nowotnik, Ph.D.
|
25,000
3,167
3,646
6,854
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
|
75,000
4,833
1,354
146
|
-
|
0.63
11.60
29.25
10.10
18.65
12.50
10.00
15.00
|
08/17/06
05/23/05
01/23/04
01/30/03
03/22/02
03/01/00
07/20/99
11/16/98
|
||
44
| Phillip S. Wise |
25,000
|
75,000
|
-
|
0.63
|
08/17/06
|
||
|
Stephen
B. Thompson
|
25,000
1,979
2,187
3,917
6,000
9,000
4,000
4,000
|
75,000
3,021
813
83
|
-
|
0.63
11.60
29.25
10.10
18.65
12.50
10.00
15.00
|
08/17/06
05/23/05
01/23/04
01/30/03
03/22/02
03/01/00
07/20/99
06/18/98
|
||
____________________
|
(1)
|
On
December 31, 2006, the closing price of our Common Stock as quoted
on the
OTC Bulletin Board was $0.52.
|
|
(2)
|
Options
listed for Dr. Mazanet include options paid to her in connection
with her
services as our Acting CEO commencing on May 11,
2005.
|
|
(3)
|
Options
listed for Mr. Gray include options paid to him in connection with
his
services as our President and CEO through May 10,
2005.
|
Board
Committees
The
Board
has established an Audit and Finance Committee, a Compensation Committee and
a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the committees of the
Board acts pursuant to a separate written charter adopted by the Board. On
February 8, 2007, the Board also established an Executive Committee consisting
of Mr. Davis, Mr. Seiler and Dr. Ahn.
The
Audit
and Finance Committee is currently comprised of David P. Luci (chairman) and
John J. Meakem, Jr. During 2006, the Audit and Finance Committee was composed
of
four directors, Max
Link,
Ph.D., Stuart M. Duty, John J. Meakem, Jr., and Jeffrey B. Davis.
All of
the current members of the Audit and Finance Committee are independent under
applicable SEC and AMEX rules and regulations. During 2006 Dr. Link, Mr. Duty
and Mr. Meakem were independent under applicable SEC and AMEX rules and
regulations. The Board has determined that Mr. Luci, the chairman of the Audit
and Finance Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert,” under
applicable SEC rules and regulations. The Audit and Finance Committee’s
responsibilities and duties are among
other things to engage the independent auditors, review the audit fees,
supervise matters relating to audit functions and review and set internal
policies and procedure regarding audits, accounting and other financial
controls.
The
Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Jeffrey B. Davis (chairman)
and
Dr. Stephen B. Howell. During
2006, the Compensation Committee was composed of Herbert H. McDade, Jr., Jeffrey
B. Davis, J. Michael Flinn and Stephen B. Howell, MD. Dr. Howell, Mr. Flinn
and
Mr. McDade are
independent under
applicable AMEX rules and regulations
and are
non-employee directors under applicable SEC rules and “outside” directors under
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of John
J.
Meakem, Jr. (chairman) and Mark J. Alvino. During 2006 Stuart M. Duty was also
a
member of the committee. All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee are independent
under
applicable AMEX rules and regulations. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other
things, considering potential Board members, making recommendations to the
full
Board as to nominees for election to the Board, assessing the effectiveness
of
the Board and implementing the Company's corporate governance
guidelines.
Compensation
of Directors
Each
director who is not also our employee receives a quarterly fee of $3,000 and
$1,000 per quarter per committee (aggregate for all committees) in which he/she
is a member. The Chairman of the Board is paid an additional $1,000 per quarter
and the Chairman of each of the Audit and Finance and Compensation Committee
is
paid an additional $500 per quarter. Mr. Flinn was paid $183,000 in 2006 for
serving as Chairman of the Board for 2005 and 2006. Each director will have
$2,000 deducted from his or her fee if the director misses more than one Board
meeting, and $1,000 deducted per committee meeting not attended. In addition,
we
reimbursed each director, whether an employee or not, the expenses of attending
Board and committee meetings. Each non-employee director is also entitled to
receive options to purchase 2,500 shares of Common Stock on the date of each
annual meeting of stockholders and options to purchase 25,000 shares of Common
Stock when he/she is first appointed as a director.
45
The
Company is not currently subject to any material pending legal
proceedings.
Based
solely upon information made available to us, the following table sets forth
certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common
Stock
as of April 30, 2007 by (i) each person who is known by us to beneficially
own
more than five percent of our Common Stock; (ii) each of our directors; (iii)
each of our named executive officers; and (iv) all our executive officers and
directors as a group. Beneficial ownership as reported in the following table
has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. The address of each holder listed below, except as
otherwise indicated, is c/o Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2600 Stemmons Freeway,
Suite 176, Dallas, Texas 75207.
|
Common
Stock Beneficially Owned
|
||||
|
Name
of Beneficial Owner
|
Number
of Shares(1)
|
%
of Class
|
||
|
Jeffery
B. Davis (2
|
30,820
|
*
|
||
|
Rosemary
Mazanet (3)
|
147,256
|
4.0%
|
||
|
Mark
Ahn (4)
|
25,000
|
*
|
|
|
|
Mark
J. Alvino (5)
|
80,525
|
2.2%
|
||
|
J.
Michael Flinn (6)
|
84,880
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|
Stephen
B. Howell, M.D. (7)
|
53,839
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
Herbert
H. McDade, Jr. (8)
|
46,151
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
John
J. Meakem, Jr.
(9)
|
53,536
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
David
P. Nowotnik, Ph.D. (10)
|
122,682
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
Phillip
S. Wise (11)
|
50,000
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
Stephen
B. Thompson (12)
|
91,521
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
Larry
N. Feinberg (13)
|
1,142,964
|
|
26.4%
|
|
|
Kerry
P. Gray (14)
|
355,136
|
|
9.3%
|
|
|
SCO
Capital Partners LLC (15)
|
4,682,040
|
|
57.0%
|
|
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(consisting
of 12 persons) (16)
|
786,211
|
|
18.5%
|
|
*
- Less
than 1%
|
(1)
|
Includes
our outstanding shares of Common Stock held plus all shares of Common
Stock issuable upon exercise of options, warrants and other rights
exercisable within 60 days of April 30, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Davis is President of SCO Securities LLC. His address is c/o SCO
Capital
Partners LLC, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 35th
Floor, New York, NY 10019. SCO Securities LLC and affiliates (SCO
Capital
Partners LLC, Beach Capital LLC, Lake End Capital LLC, Howard Fischer,
Mr.
Davis and Mark J. Alvino) are known to beneficially own warrants
to
purchase an aggregate of 4,682,040 of our Common Stock and 5,454,544
shares of Common Stock issuable to them upon conversion of notes.
Mr.
Davis disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares except to
the
extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Does not include any such
shares
other than 5,280 shares underlying warrants held directly by Mr.
Davis.
Includes presently exercisable options for the purchase of 25,000
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 141,256 shares
of our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 6,000
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
46
|
(4)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 25,000 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
55,525 shares of Common Stock underlying warrants held by Mr. Alvino.
Mr.
Alvino is Managing Director of SCO Securities LLC. His address is
c/o SCO
Capital Partners LLC, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 35th
Floor, New York, NY 10019. SCO Securities LLC and affiliates (SCO
Capital
Partners LLC, Beach Capital LLC, Lake End Capital LLC, Howard Fischer,
Jeffrey B. Davis and Mr. Alvino) are known to beneficially own warrants
to
purchase an aggregate of 4,682,040 of our Common Stock and 5,454,544
shares of Common Stock issuable to them upon conversion of notes.
Mr.
Alvino disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares except to
the
extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Does not include any such
shares
other than 55,525 shares underlying warrants held directly by Mr.
Alvino.
Includes presently exercisable options for the purchase of 25,000
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 46,200 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 16,500
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 26,200 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, 12,917 shares
of
our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, a warrant
to
purchase 3,000 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of
$15.00
per share, and a warrant to purchase 2,000 shares of our Common Stock
at
an exercise price of $24.80 per
share.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 26,200 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 12,500
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 31,036 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 13,500
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 50,000 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 55,167
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 50,000 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
|
(12)
|
Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 50,000 shares of
our
Common Stock pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 32,000
shares
of our Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
|
(13)
|
Larry
N. Feinberg is a partner in Oracle Partners, L.P. His address is
c/o
Oracle Partners, L.P., 200 Greenwich Avenue, 3rd
Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830. Oracle Partners, L.P. and affiliates
(Oracle
Institutional Partners, L.P., Oracle Investment Management, Inc.,
Sam
Oracle Fund, Inc. and Mr. Feinberg) are known to beneficially own
an
aggregate of 339,964 shares of our Common Stock and convertible notes
which may convert into an aggregate of 803,000 shares of our Common
Stock.
|
|
(14)
|
Mr.
Gray's address is 4939 Stony Ford Dr., Dallas, Texas 75287. Includes
presently exercisable options for the purchase of 296,000 shares
of our
Common Stock pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 2000
Special
Stock Option Plan.
|
|
(15)
|
SCO
Capital Partners LLC's address is 1285 Avenue of the Americas,
35th
Floor, New York, NY 10019. SCO Capital Partners LLC and affiliates
(Beach
Capital LLC, Lake End Capital LLC, Howard Fisher, Jeffrey B. Davis
and
Mark J. Alvino) are known to beneficially own warrants to purchase
an
aggregate of 4,682,040 shares of our Common Stock and 5,454,544 shares
of
Common Stock issuable to them upon conversion of notes. Each of Mr.
Davis
and Mr. Alvino, our directors and executives with SCO Capital Partners
LLC, disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the
extent of
his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
(16)
|
Does
not include shares held by SCO Securities LLC and affiliates (other
than
shares underlying warrants held directly by Messrs. Davis and
Alvino).
|
SECURITIES
AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
We
adopted our 2005 Stock Option Plan in May 2005, as amended, authorizing
1,000,000 shares under the plan. We have issued 977,672 options or rights under
this plan as of April 16, 2007. The balance of the options outstanding as of
April 16, 2007 is 22,328. We adopted our 2001 Restricted Stock Plan in May
2001,
authorizing 80,000 shares of our authorized but unissued common stock were
reserved for issuance to certain employees, directors, consultants and advisors.
We have issued 27,182 shares and 52,818 shares available for grant.
47
The
following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2006 about shares
of
Common Stock outstanding and available for issuance under our equity
compensation plans existing as of such date.
|
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under
equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
|
|||||
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||
|
Equity
compensation
plans
approved
by
security holders
2005
Equity Incentive Plan
1995
Stock Awards Plan
2001
Restricted Stock Plan
|
802,672
360,917
-
|
$
1.04
$18.03
-
|
197,328
-
52,818
|
|||||
|
Equity
compensation
plans
not approved
by
security holders
2000
Special Stock Option
Plan
|
100,000
|
$12.50
|
-
|
|||||
|
Total
|
1,263,589
|
$
6.80
|
250,146
|
|||||
The
2000 Special Stock Option Plan
The
2000
Special Stock Option Plan (the "Special Plan") was adopted by the Board in
October 2000. The Special Plan is a non-stockholder approved plan (as permitted
under NASD rules and regulations applicable at the time of adoption by the
Board). The Special Plan is intended to be a broadly based plan within the
meaning of NASD rules and regulations applicable at the time of adoption by
the
Board. The Special Plan is not intended to be an incentive stock option plan
within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”). The Special Plan allows for the issuance of up to 100,000
options to acquire the Company’s stock all of which have been issued. The
purpose of the Special Plan is to encourage ownership of Common Stock by
employees, consultants, advisors and directors of the Company and its affiliates
and to provide additional incentive for them to promote the success of the
Company’s business. The Special Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified
stock options to employees (including officers, directors, advisors and
consultants). The Special Plan will expire in October 2010, unless earlier
terminated by the Board. The options that have been granted expire June 30,
2007.
The
2007 Special Stock Option Plan
The
2007
Special Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") was adopted by the Board in January
2007.
The Plan is not intended to be an incentive stock option plan within the meaning
of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
The Plan allows for the issuance of up to 450,000 options to acquire the
Company’s stock all of which have been issued. The purpose of the Plan is to
encourage ownership of Common Stock by employees, consultants, advisors and
directors of the Company and its affiliates and to provide additional incentive
for them to promote the success of the Company’s business. The Plan provides for
the grant of non-qualified stock options to employees (including officers,
directors, advisors and consultants). The Plan will expire in January 2017,
unless earlier terminated by the Board. All of the options have been granted
in
the Plan in January 2007.
In
the
event SCO Capital Partners LLC (“SCO”) and its affiliates were to convert all of
their notes and exercise all of their warrants, they would own approximately
74.1% of the voting securities of Access. During 2006 SCO and affiliates were
paid $415,000 in fees relating to the issuance of convertible notes and were
paid $131,000 in investor relations fees.
48
Dr.
Howell, one of our directors, also serves as a scientific consultant to the
Company pursuant to a consulting agreement that provides for a minimum of two
days consulting during 2007 at a rate of $5,880 per month plus expenses. Dr.
Howell received warrants to purchase 2,000 shares of our Common Stock at $24.80
per share that can be exercised until January 1, 2009; and warrants to purchase
3,000 shares of our Common Stock at $15.00 per share that can be exercised
until
January 1, 2008. During 2006, Dr. Howell was paid $69,000 in consulting fees;
during 2005, Dr. Howell was paid $79,000 in consulting fees; and during 2004
Dr.
Howell was paid $58,000 in consulting fees. Dr. Howell’s agreement with us
expires March 1, 2008.
On
January 20, 2006, the Board approved the payment of a fee of $140,000 to J.
Michael Flinn, our former Chairman of the Board, for services as Chairman of
the
Board for fiscal 2005. The $140,000 fee was paid on the completion of a
financing. The Board also approved the grant of options to purchase 20,000
shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.15 per share to J. Michael
Flinn for services as Chairman of the Board. In May 2006, the Board also
approved the payment of a fee of $43,333 to Mr. Flinn for services as Chairman
of the Board for 2006. The Board also approved the grant of options to purchase
4,836 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.15 per share to Messrs.
Duty and Meakem, members of the then existing Merger and Acquisitions Committee
of the Board, for services in connection therewith. The Board also approved
the
grant of options to purchase 1,200 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
of $3.15 per share to each member of the Board, for services as members of
the
Board.
In
August
2006, the Board approved the grant of options to purchase 25,000 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.63 per share to each member of the
Board.
On
October 12, 2000, the Board authorized a restricted stock purchase program.
Under the program, our executive officers were given the opportunity to purchase
shares of Common Stock in an individually designated amount per participant
determined by our Compensation Committee. A total of 36,000 shares were
purchased by such officers at $27.50 per share, the fair market value of the
Common Stock on October 12, 2000, for an aggregate consideration of $990,000.
The purchase price was paid through the participant’s delivery of a 50%-recourse
promissory note payable to us. Each note bears interest at 5.87% compounded
semi-annually and has a maximum term of ten years. The notes are secured by
a
pledge to us of the purchased shares. We recorded the notes receivable of
$990,000 from participants in this program as a reduction of equity in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2006, principal and interest
on
the notes was: Mr. Gray - $809,000; Dr. Nowotnik - $404,000; and Mr. Thompson
-
$243,000. In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we no longer make
loans to our executive officers.
Our
common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, or OTCBB, under the trading
symbol ACCP since June 5, 2006. From February 1, 2006 until June 5, 2006 we
traded on the “Pink Sheets” under the trading symbol AKCA. From March 30, 2000
until January 31, 2006 we traded on the American Stock Exchange, or AMEX, under
the trading symbol AKC.
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing
prices as reported by OTCBB, the Pink Sheets and AMEX for our common stock
for
fiscal years 2006 and 2005. The OTCBB and Pink Sheet quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may
not
represent actual transactions.
All
per
share information reflect a one for five reverse stock split effected June
5,
2006.
|
Common
Stock
|
|||||||
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
| Quarter Ended | |||||||
| First quarter March 31, 2007 | $ |
10.66
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
||
| Second quarter April 30, 2007 | 6.75 |
4.75
|
|
||||
49
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|||||||
|
First
quarter
|
$
|
2.65
|
$
|
0.80
|
|||
|
Second
quarter
|
1.50
|
0.10
|
|||||
|
Third
quarter
|
1.30
|
0.45
|
|||||
|
Fourth
quarter
|
3.00
|
1.05
|
|||||
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|||||||
|
First
quarter
|
$
|
18.30
|
$
|
11.00
|
|||
|
Second
quarter
|
15.05
|
8.80
|
|||||
|
Third
quarter
|
9.95
|
2.80
|
|||||
|
Fourth
quarter
|
8.65
|
2.60
|
Holders
The
number of record holders of Access common stock at April 30, 2007 was
approximately 3,000. On April 30, 2007, the closing price for the common stock
as quoted on the OTCBB was $4.95. There were 3,535,358 shares of common stock
outstanding at April 30, 2007.
Options
and Warrants
There
are
4,826,517 outstanding warrants and 1,888,704 outstanding options to purchase
our
common equity as of April 30, 2007.
Shares
Eligible for Future Sales
We
have
issued 3,535,358 shares of our common stock as of April 30, 2007. Of these
shares, all shares are unrestricted and held by non-affiliates, and are freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act. These shares will be
eligible for sale in the public market, subject to certain volume limitations
and the expiration of applicable holding periods under Rule 144 under the
Securities Act. In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
(or
persons whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted
shares for at least one year (including the holding period of any prior owner
or
affiliate) would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number
of
shares that does not exceed the greater of one percent (1%) of the number of
shares of common stock then outstanding or (2) the average weekly trading volume
of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of
a
Form 144 with respect to such sale. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to
certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us. Under Rule 144(k), a person
who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of us at any time during the three
months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed
to
be sold for at least two years (including the holding period of any prior owner
except an affiliate), is entitled to sell such shares without complying with
the
manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice provisions
of
Rule 144.
Dividends
We
have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our preferred stock or common
stock
and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The payment of dividends, if any, in the future is within the discretion of
our
Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements and
financial condition and other relevant facts. We currently intend to retain
all
future earnings, if any, to finance the development and growth of our
business.
Our
certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 100,000,000 shares
of
our common stock, $.01 par value per share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $.01 par value per share, which may be issued in one or more series.
As
of
April
30,
2007 there were 3,535,358 shares of our common stock outstanding and held
of record by approximately 5,900 stockholders, and there were no shares of
our
preferred stock outstanding.
50
Common
Stock
Holders
of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders and have the right to vote cumulatively
for
the election of directors. This means that in the voting at our annual meeting,
each stockholder or his proxy, may multiply the number of his shares by the
number of directors to be elected then cast the resulting total number of votes
for a single nominee, or distribute such votes on the ballot among the nominees
as desired. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such
dividends, if any, as may be declared by our Board of
Directors
out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any preferential dividend
rights for our outstanding preferred stock. Upon our liquidation, dissolution
or
winding up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably
our
net assets available after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and
subject to the prior rights of any of our outstanding preferred stock. Holders
of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion
rights. The outstanding shares of our common stock are, and the shares offered
by the selling stockholders in this offering will be, fully paid and
nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our common
stock are subject
to,
and
may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series
of our preferred stock which we may designate and issue in the
future.
Preferred
Stock
Our
Board
of Directors is authorized, subject to certain limitations prescribed by law,
without further stockholder approval, to issue from time to time up to an
aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and
to
fix or alter the designations, preferences, rights and any qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of the shares of each such series thereof, including
the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights and terms
of redemption of shares constituting any series or designations of such series.
The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring
or
preventing a change of control. The fact that our board of directors has the
right to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval could be used to
institute a “poison pill” that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a
potential
hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been
approved by our board of directors. We have no present plans to issue any shares
of preferred stock.
Notes
and Warrants
On
December 6, 2006, Access entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares
of
common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes are
convertible into Access common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per
share, bear interest of 7.5% per annum and are secured by certain assets of
Access. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO Capital Partners LLC (“SCO”) and affiliates.
Each note may be converted at the option of the noteholder or Access under
certain circumstances as set forth in the notes. Each noteholder received a
warrant to purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75%
of
the total number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to December 6, 2012.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes are convertible into
Access common stock at a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest
of 7.5% per annum and are secured by certain assets of Access. The notes and
warrants were sold in a private placement to a group of accredited investors
led
by SCO and affiliates. Each note may be converted at the option of the
noteholder or Access under certain circumstances as set forth in the notes.
Each
noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares of common stock
of
Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access common stock into
which
such holder’s note is convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32
per share and is exercisable at any time prior to October 24, 2012.
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due June 11, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $4.5
million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a group
of
accredited investors led by SCO and its affiliates. Each noteholder received
a
warrant to purchase a number of shares of common stock of Access equal to 75%
of
the total number shares of Access common stock into which such holder’s note is
convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price of $1.32 per share and is
exercisable at any time prior to February 16, 2012.
51
The
notes
mature on June 11, 2007, are convertible into Access common stock at a fixed
conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest of 7.5% per annum and are
secured by certain assets of Access. Each note may be converted at the
option
of
the noteholder or Access under certain circumstances as set forth in the
notes.
In
the
event SCO and its affiliates were to convert all of their notes and exercise
all
of their warrants, it would own approximately 70.4% of the voting securities
of
Access.
In
connection with the sale and issuance of notes and warrants, Access entered
into
an investors rights agreement whereby it granted SCO the right to designate
two
individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of Access while the notes are
outstanding, and also granted registration rights with respect to the shares
of
common stock of Access underlying the notes and warrants. SCO designated Jeffrey
B. Davis and Mark J. Alvino to the Board of Directors, and on March 13, 2006
Messrs, Davis and Alvino were appointed to the Board of Directors.
Restructuring
Convertible Notes
On
November 9, 2005 we announced the restructuring and partial repayment of our
7.0% convertible promissory notes due September 13, 2005.
One
holder of $4 million worth of convertible notes (Oracle Partners LP and related
funds) agreed to amend their notes to a new maturity date, June 12, 2007, with
the conversion price being reduced from $27.50 per share to $5.00 per share.
In
addition, the Company may cause a mandatory conversion of the notes into common
stock if the common stock trades at a price of at least 1.5 times the conversion
price for a minimum number of trading days. There is also a provision to allow
for a minimum price for conversion in the event of a change of control of the
Company. This modification resulted in us recording additional debt discount
of
$2.1 million, which will be accreted to interest expense to the revised maturity
date.
The
Company was unable to reach a conversion agreement with the second holder of
$4
million worth of notes (Philip D. Kaltenbacher), so settled his claim by paying
him this amount plus expenses and interest as outlined in the terms of the
note.
The
third
noteholder, holding $5.5 million worth of convertible notes agreed to amend
its
notes to a new maturity date, September 13, 2010 and elected to have the 2005
interest of $423,000 to be paid on September 13, 2006. The delayed
interest
will earn interest at a rate of 7.7%. We do not have sufficient funds to repay
our convertible notes at their maturity. We may not be able to restructure
the
convertible notes or obtain additional financing to repay them on terms
acceptable to us, if at all. If we raise additional funds by selling equity
securities, the relative equity ownership of our existing investors would be
diluted and the new investors could obtain terms more favorable than previous
investors. A failure to restructure
our
convertible notes or obtain additional funding to repay the convertible notes
and support our working capital and operating requirements, could cause us
to be
in default of our convertible notes and prevent us from making expenditures
that
are needed to allow us to maintain our operations. A failure to restructure
our
existing convertible notes or obtain necessary additional capital in the future
could jeopardize our operations.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The
transfer agent and registrar of our common stock is American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company, New York, New York.
Delaware
Law and Certain Charter and By-Law Provisions
Certain
anti-takeover provisions.
We
are
subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of
Delaware. Section 203 prohibits certain publicly held Delaware corporations
from
engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder,” for
a
period
of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became
an
“interested stockholder”, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner. A “business combination” includes mergers, asset sales and
other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested
stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, an “interested stockholder” is a
person or entity who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within
the preceding three years, did own) 15% or more of the corporation’s voting
stock. The statute contains provisions enabling a corporation to avoid the
statute’s
restrictions if the stockholders holding a majority of the corporation’s voting
stock approve our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our directors
shall
be divided into three classes, with the terms of each class to expire on
different years.
52
In
addition, our Certificate of Incorporation, in order to combat “greenmail,”
provides in general that any direct or indirect purchase by us of any of our
voting stock or rights to acquire voting stock known to be beneficially owned
by
any person or group which holds more than five percent of a class of our voting
stock and which has owned the securities being purchased for less than two
years
must be approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast by the holders of voting stock, subject to certain
exceptions. The prohibition of “greenmail” may tend to discourage or foreclose
certain acquisitions of our securities which might temporarily increase the
price of our securities. Discouraging the acquisition of a large block of our
securities by an outside party may also have a potential negative effect on
takeovers. Parties seeking control of us through large acquisitions of its
securities will not be able to resort to “greenmail” should their bid fail, thus
making such a bid less attractive to persons seeking to initiate a takeover
effort.
Elimination
of Monetary Liability for Officers and Directors
Our
Certificate of Incorporation incorporates certain provisions permitted under
the
General Corporation Law of Delaware relating to the liability of directors.
The
provisions eliminate a director’s liability for monetary damages for a breach of
fiduciary duty, including gross negligence, except in circumstances involving
certain wrongful acts, such as the breach of director’s duty of loyalty or acts
or omissions, which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law. These provisions do not eliminate a director’s duty of care. Moreover,
these provisions do not apply to claims against a Director for violations of
certain laws, including certain federal securities laws. Our Certificate of
Incorporation also contains provisions to indemnify the directors, officers,
employees or other agents to the fullest extent permitted by the General
Corporation Law of Delaware. We believe that these provisions will assist us
in
attracting and retaining qualified individual to serve as
directors.
Indemnification
of Officers and Directors
Our
Certificate of Incorporation also contains provisions to indemnify the
directors, officers, employees or other agents to the fullest extent permitted
by the General Corporation Law of Delaware. These provisions may have the
practical effect in certain cases of eliminating the ability of shareholders
to
collect monetary damages from directors. We believe that these provisions will
assist us in attracting or retaining qualified individuals to serve as our
directors.
The
consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 included in this prospectus, and incorporated by reference
in
the Registration Statement, have been audited by Whitley Penn LLP and Grant
Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in
their
reports appearing with the consolidated financial statements herein and
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement, and are included in
reliance upon the report of such firms given upon their authority as experts
in
accounting and auditing.
Bingham
McCutchen LLP has passed upon the validity of the shares of common stock
offered hereby.
We
have
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC, a
registration statement on Form SB-2 under the Securities Act of 1933 with
respect to the shares we are offering. Prior to the effective date of the
registration statement, we were subject to the information requirements of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). This prospectus does
not
contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement, as
permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Reference is hereby made
to
the registration statement and exhibits thereto for further information with
respect to us and the shares to which this prospectus relates. Copies of the
registration statement and other information filed by with the SEC can be
inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC
in
Washington, DC at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. In addition,
the
SEC maintains a World Wide Web site that contains reports, proxy statements
and
other information regarding registrants such as us which filed electronically
with the SEC at the following Internet address: (http:www.sec.gov).
53
We
file
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission in accordance with requirements of the Exchange Act. These
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are available for
inspection and copying at the regional offices, public reference facilities
and
Internet site of the Securities and Exchange Commission referred to above.
In
addition, you may request a copy of any of our periodic reports filed with
the
Securities and Exchange Commission at no cost, by writing or telephoning us
at
the following address:
Investors
Relations
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2600
Stemmons Freeway, Suite 176
Dallas,
Texas 75207
(214)
905-5100
Information
contained on our website is not a prospectus and does not constitute a part
of
this Prospectus.
You
should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated by reference
or
provided in this Prospectus. We have not authorized anyone else to provide
you
with different information. We are not making an offer of these securities
in
any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume the
information in this Prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date
on
the front of this Prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report
of Registered Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-1
|
|
Report
of Registered Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance
Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
F-3
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements
of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for 2006, 2005 and
2004
|
F-20
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements
of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for 2006,
2005 and 2004
|
F-21
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements
of Cash Flows for 2006,
2005 and 2004
|
F-22
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-24
|
|
|
|
|
54
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for
the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year
then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses from
operations and a net working capital deficiency and accumulated deficit that
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include
any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that
may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
As
discussed in Note 1
to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, effective
January 1, 2006. As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff
Position No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment
Arrangements”, effective October 1, 2006.
/s/
WHITLEY PENN LLP
Dallas,
Texas
March
30,
2007
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board
of Directors and
Shareholders
of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as of December 31, 2005, and the results of their
consolidated operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements the Company has incurred significant losses
in
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in the amounts
of
$1.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively; the Company’s total liabilities
exceeded its assets by $4.2 million at December 31, 2005; and its operating
cash
flows were negative $7.3 million and negative $9.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These matters, among others described
in Note 2, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described
in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas,
Texas
April
25,
2006
F-2
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
ASSETS
|
December
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
|
Current
assets
|
|||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,194,000
|
$
|
349,000
|
|||
|
Short
term investments, at cost
|
3,195,000
|
125,000
|
|||||
|
Receivables
|
359,000
|
4,488,000
|
|||||
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
283,000
|
197,000
|
|||||
|
Total
current assets
|
5,031,000
|
5,159,000
|
|||||
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
212,000
|
300,000
|
|||||
|
Debt
issuance costs, net
|
158,000
|
-
|
|||||
|
Patents,
net
|
878,000
|
1,046,000
|
|||||
|
Licenses,
ne
|
25,000
|
75,000
|
|||||
|
Restricted
cash and other assets
|
122,000
|
633,000
|
|||||
|
Total
assets
|
$
|
6,426,000
|
$
|
7,213,000
|
|||
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|||||||
|
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
1,226,000
|
$
|
2,883,000
|
|||
|
Accrued
interest payable
|
581,000
|
652,000
|
|||||
|
Deferred
revenues
|
173,000
|
173,000
|
|||||
|
Current
portion long-term debt, net
of discount $2,062,000 in 2006
|
8,833,000
|
106,000
|
|||||
|
Total
current liabilities
|
10,813,000
|
3,814,000
|
|||||
|
Long-term
debt, net of discount $1,879,000 in 2005
|
5,500,000
|
7,636,000
|
|||||
|
Total
liabilities
|
16,313,000
|
11,450,000
|
|||||
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
|
Stockholders'
deficit
|
|||||||
|
Preferred
stock - $.01 par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares;
none
issued or outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
|
Common
stock - $.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares;
issued,
3,535,108 at December 31, 2006 and authorized
50,000,000
shares; issued 3,528,108 at December 31, 2005
|
35,000
|
35,000
|
|||||
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
68,799,000
|
62,942,000
|
|||||
|
Notes
receivable from stockholders
|
(1,045,000
|
)
|
(1,045,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Treasury
stock, at cost - 163 shares
|
(4,000
|
)
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(77,672,000
|
)
|
(66,165,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(9,887,000
|
)
|
(4,237,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$
|
6,426,000
|
$
|
7,213,000
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
F-3
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
|
Expenses
|
||||||||||
|
Research
and development
|
$
|
2,053,000
|
$
|
2,783,000
|
$
|
2,335,000
|
||||
|
General
and administrative
|
2,813,000
|
4,638,000
|
3,199,000
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
309,000
|
333,000
|
469,000
|
|||||||
|
Write
off of goodwill
|
-
|
1,868,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Total
expenses
|
5,175,000
|
9,622,000
|
6,003,000
|
|||||||
|
Loss
from operations
|
(5,175,000
|
)
|
(9,622,000
|
)
|
(6,003,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Interest
and miscellaneous income
|
294,000
|
100,000
|
226,000
|
|||||||
|
Interest
and other expense
|
(7,436,000
|
)
|
(2,100,000
|
)
|
(1,385,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Unrealized
loss on fair value of warrants and beneficial
conversion
feature
|
(1,107,000
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
|
(8,249,000
|
)
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
(1,159,000
|
||||||
|
Loss
before discontinued operations and before tax benefit
|
(13,424,000
|
)
|
(11,622,000
|
)
|
(7,162,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Income
tax benefit
|
173,000 |
4,067,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(13,251,000
|
)
|
(7,555,000
|
)
|
(7,162,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Discontinued
operations, net of taxes of $173,000 in 2006 and $4,067,000
in
2005
|
377,000
|
5,855,000
|
(3,076,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(12,874,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,700,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,238,000
|
)
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
||||||||||
|
Loss
from continuing operations allocable to common
stockholders
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
$
|
(2.34
|
)
|
$
|
(2.36
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
0.11
|
1.81
|
(1.02
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net
loss allocable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(3.65
|
)
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
$
|
(3.38
|
)
|
|
|
Weighted
average basic and diluted common shares
outstanding
|
3,531,934
|
3,237,488
|
3,032,451
|
|||||||
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(12,874,000
|
)
|
$
|
(
1,700,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,238,000
|
)
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
-
|
3,000
|
(17,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
$
|
(12,874,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,697,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,255,000
|
)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
F-4
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
Common
Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
Notes
receivable from stockholders
|
Unamortized
value
of restricted stock grants
|
Treasury
stock
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
(loss)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
December 31, 2003
|
2,679,000
|
$
27,000
|
$49,704,000
|
(1,045,000)
|
$(294,000)
|
$(4,000)
|
$14,000
|
$(54,227,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock issued
for
cash, net of offering
costs
|
359,000
|
4,000
|
9,012,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock issued for
cash
exercise of
warrants
and options
|
23,000
|
-
|
283,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock issued for cashless
exercise
of warrants
|
42,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of restricted
stock
grants
|
2,000
|
-
|
135,000
|
-
|
(135,000)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other
comprehensive
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(17,000)
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
of restricted stock grants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(10,238,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
December 31, 2004
|
3,105,000
|
31,000
|
59,134
000
|
(1,045,000)
|
(309,000)
|
(4,000)
|
(3,000)
|
(64,465,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock issued,
net
of offering costs
|
237,000
|
2,000
|
1,119,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock issued
for
payment of interest
|
190,000
|
2,000
|
616,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,000
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Discount
on convertible
note
extension
|
-
|
-
|
2,109,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
and
forfeiture
of restricted
stock
grants
|
(4,000)
|
-
|
(36,000)
|
-
|
309,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,700,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
3,528,000
|
35,000
|
62,942,000
|
(1,045,000)
|
-
|
(4,000)
|
-
|
(66,165,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
stock issued for
compensation
|
7,000
|
-
|
77,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Warrants
issued
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Stock
option
compensation
expense
|
-
|
-
|
248,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
of convertible
debt
with warrants
|
-
|
-
|
5,432,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
effect of
change
in accounting
principle
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,367,000
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(12,874,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
3,535,000
|
$
35,000
|
$
68,799,000
|
(1,045,000)
|
$
-
|
$
(4,000)
|
$
-
|
$(77,672,000)
|
|||||||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
F-5
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(12,874,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,700,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,238,000
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used
|
||||||||||
|
in
operating activities:
|
||||||||||
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
1,107,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Loss
on sale Australia assets
|
-
|
208,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Impairment
of investment
|
-
|
-
|
112,000
|
|||||||
|
Write
off of goodwill
|
-
|
1,868,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Amortization
of restricted stock grants
|
-
|
309,000
|
120,000
|
|||||||
|
Stock
option expense
|
248,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Stock
issued for compensation
|
77,000
|
42,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Stock
issued for interest
|
-
|
618,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
309,000
|
570,000
|
773,000
|
|||||||
|
Amortization
of debt costs and discounts
|
6,749,
000
|
695,000
|
183,000
|
|||||||
|
Gain
on sale of assets
|
(550,000)
|
(12,891,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
|
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
4,129,000
|
622,000
|
358,000
|
|||||||
|
Inventory
|
-
|
104,000
|
60,000
|
|||||||
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
14,000
|
|
817,000
|
(195,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Restricted
cash and other assets
|
127,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(1,657,000
|
)
|
490,000
|
401,000
|
||||||
|
Accrued
interest payable
|
363,000
|
341,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Deferred
revenues
|
-
|
606,000
|
15,000
|
|||||||
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,958,000
|
)
|
(7,301,000
|
)
|
(8,411,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||
|
Capital
expenditures
|
(3,000
|
)
|
(28,000
|
)
|
(221,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Proceeds
from sale of equipment
|
-
|
355,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Proceeds
from sale of patents
|
-
|
974,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Proceeds
from sale of oral/topical care assets
|
550,000
|
7,391,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Restricted
cash and other assets
|
|
684,000
|
(666,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Redemptions
of short-term investments
|
||||||||||
|
and
certificates of deposit, net
|
(3,070,000
|
)
|
361,000
|
1,374,000
|
||||||
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(2,523,000
|
)
|
9,717,000
|
487,000
|
||||||
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||
|
Payments
of notes payable
|
(106,000
|
)
|
(407,000
|
)
|
(310,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Payment
of secured notes payable and convertible notes
|
-
|
(6,648,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
|
Proceeds
from secured notes payable
|
5,432,000
|
2,633,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Proceeds
from stock issuances, net of costs
|
-
|
577,000
|
9,299,000
|
|||||||
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
5,326,000
|
(3,845,000
|
)
|
8,989,000
|
||||||
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
845,000
|
(1,429,000
|
)
|
1,065,000
|
||||||
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
-
|
3,000
|
(17,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
349,000
|
1,775,000
|
727,000
|
|||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
1,194,000
|
$
|
349,000
|
$
|
1,775,000
|
||||
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
315,000
|
$
|
445,000
|
$
|
1,073,000
|
||||
|
Supplemental
disclosure of noncash transactions
|
||||||||||
|
Value
of restricted stock grants
|
-
|
-
|
135,000
|
|||||||
|
Assets
acquired under capital leases
|
-
|
-
|
59,000
|
|||||||
|
Common
stock issued for SEDA and
|
||||||||||
|
Secured
Convertible Notes
|
-
|
502,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Discount
on convertible note extension
|
-
|
2,109,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Debt
issuance costs
|
568,000
|
|||||||||
|
Accrued
interest capitalized
|
433,000
|
|||||||||
|
Warrants
issued per professional agreement of consulting
services
|
100,000
|
|||||||||
|
Cumulative
change of accounting principle
|
1,367,000
|
|||||||||
|
Issuance
of convertible debt with warrants
|
5,432,000
|
|||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
F-6
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Nature
of Operations
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an emerging pharmaceutical company engaged in
the
development of novel therapeutics for the treatment of cancer and supportive
care of cancer patients. This development work is based primarily on
the
adaptation of existing therapeutic agents using the Company’s proprietary drug
delivery technology. Our efforts have been principally devoted to research
and
development, resulting in significant losses since inception on February
24,
1988.
A
summary
of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of
the
accompanying consolidated financial statements follows.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use
of
Estimates
In
preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management
is
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at
the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those
estimates.
We
tested
intangible assets for impairment based on estimates of fair value. It
is at
least reasonably possible that the estimates used by us will be materially
different from actual amounts. These differences could result in the
impairment
of all or a portion of our intangible assets, which could have a materially
adverse effect on our results of operations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We
consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three
months
or less to be cash equivalents for purposes of the statements of cash
flows.
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash in banks, money market
funds
and short-term corporate securities. We invest any excess cash in government
and
corporate securities. All other investments are reported as short-term
investments.
Short-term
Investments
Short-term
investments consist of certificates of deposit. All short term investments
are
classified as held to maturity. The cost of debt securities is adjusted
for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such
amortization is included in interest income. The cost of securities sold
is
based on the specific identification method.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided using the
straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to
seven
years. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the
useful
lives are capitalized. Expenditures for normal maintenance and repairs
are
expensed as incurred. The cost of assets sold or abandoned and the related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any gains
or
losses are recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations
of the respective period.
F-7
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
-
Continued
Research
and Development Expenses
Pursuant
to SFAS No. 2, “Accounting
for Research and Development Costs,”
our
research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and
development expenses include, but are not limited to, payroll and personnel
expense, lab supplies, preclinical, development cost, clinical trial
expense,
outside manufacturing and consulting. The cost of materials and equipment
or
facilities that are acquired for research and development activities
and that
have alternative future uses are capitalized when acquired.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying value of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and
accounts
payable approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these items.
It is
not practical to estimate the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt because
quoted market prices do not exist and there were no available securities
with
similar terms to use as a basis to value our debt.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred
tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income
in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date. A
valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets to the extent
their
realization is in doubt.
Loss
Per Share
We
have
presented basic loss per share, computed on the basis of the weighted
average
number of common shares outstanding during the year, and diluted loss
per share,
computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares
and all
dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the year. Potential
common
shares result from stock options, vesting of restricted stock grants,
convertible notes and warrants. However, for all years presented, all
outstanding stock options, restricted stock grants, convertible notes
and
warrants are anti-dilutive due to the losses for the periods. Anti-dilutive
common stock equivalents of 12,548,342; 1,730,135; and 1,114,122 were
excluded
from the loss per share computation for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted
cash is cash that is or may be committed for a particular purpose. We
had
restricted cash in 2005 as collateral for a note payable of $103,000.
The note
was paid in full in 2006 and there is no restricted cash in 2006.
Intangible
Assets
We
expense internal patent and application costs as incurred because, even
though
we believe the patents and underlying processes have continuing value,
the
amount of future benefits to be derived therefrom are uncertain. Purchased
patents are capitalized and amortized over the life of the patent. We
recognize
the purchase cost of licenses and amortize them over their estimated
useful
lives.
The
Company operates in a single segment. In 2005, the Company wrote off
its
goodwill as determined by comparing the Company’s market capitalization with its
net asset value resulting in an impairment charge of $1,868,000. In 2005,
the
Company sold one of its patents for $974,000 and the Company believes
the fair
value of the remaining patents based on discounted cash flow analysis
exceeds
the carry value.
F-8
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
-
Continued
Intangible
assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
December
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
December
31, 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
carrying
value
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
Gross
carrying
value
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
Gross
carrying
value
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortizable
intangible assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Patents
|
$
|
1,680
|
$
|
802
|
$
|
1,680
|
$
|
634
|
$
|
3,179
|
$
|
864
|
|||||||
|
Licenses
|
500
|
475
|
500
|
425
|
500
|
375
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,180
|
$
|
1,277
|
$
|
2,180
|
$
|
1,059
|
$
|
3,679
|
$
|
1,239
|
|||||||
Amortization
expense related to intangible assets totaled $218,000, $345,000 and $421,000
for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The aggregate
estimated amortization expense for intangible assets remaining as of
December
31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
2007
|
$
|
193
|
||
|
2008
|
168
|
|||
|
2009
|
168
|
|||
|
2010
|
168
|
|||
|
2011
|
168
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
38
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
903
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
On
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment,”
(“SFAS
123(R)”), which requires the measurement and recognition of all share-based
payment awards made to employees and directors including stock options
based on
estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting
under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees”
(“APB
25”), for periods beginning in fiscal year 2006. In March 2005, the Securities
and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB
107”) relating to SFAS 123(R). We applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its
adoption of SFAS 123(R).
We
adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method,
which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006,
the first day of the Company’s 2006 fiscal year. Our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, reflect the impact of SFAS
123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method,
our
consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated
to
include the impact of SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense recognized
under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately
$248,000. Stock-based compensation expense which would have been recognized
under the fair value based method would have been approximately $750,000
during
the year ended December 31, 2005.
F-9
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
-
Continued
SFAS
123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment
awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value
of the
portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized
as
expense over the requisite service period in the company’s Statement of
Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for stock-based
awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in
accordance
with APB No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation”
(“SFAS
123”). Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense
for
stock option grants was recognized because the exercise price of our
stock
options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value
of the
underlying stock at the date of grant. In 2005, we did recognize stock
compensation expense for restricted stock awards based on the fair value
of the
underlying stock on date of grant and this expense was amortized over
the
requisite service period. There were no restricted stock awards granted
in 2006
and therefore no stock compensation expense is recognized in 2006.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized in our Statement of Operations for the
first
year ended December 31, 2006 includes compensation expense for share-based
payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31,
2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with
the pro
forma provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation expense for the share-based
payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the
grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 is based on awards ultimately
expected to vest and has been reduced for estimated forfeitures, which
currently
is nil. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time
of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures
differ
from those estimates. In the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS
123 for periods prior to fiscal year 2006, forfeitures have been accounted
for
as they occurred.
We
use
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (“Black-Scholes”) as its method of
valuation under SFAS 123(R) in fiscal year 2006 and a single option award
approach. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis
over the
requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting
period.
Black-Scholes was also previously used for our pro forma information
required
under SFAS 123 for periods prior to fiscal year 2006. The fair value
of
share-based payment awards on the date of grant as determined by the
Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price as well as other assumptions.
These assumptions include, but are not limited to the expected stock
price
volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee
stock
option exercise behaviors.
During
2006, 753,872 stock options were granted and 50,000 stock options were
granted
during 2005 under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, 49,700
stock
options were granted during 2005 under the 1995 Stock Award Program.
Assumptions
for 2006 are:
| · |
127%
- the expected volatility assumption was based upon a combination
of
historical stock price volatility measured on a twice a month
basis and is
a reasonable indicator of expected volatility.
|
| · |
4.85%
(average) - the risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon
U.S.
Treasury bond interest rates appropriate for the term of the
Company’s
employee stock options.
|
| · |
None
- the dividend yield assumption is based on our history and expectation
of
dividend payments.
|
| · |
1.6
years - the estimated expected term (average of 1.6 years) is
based on
employee exercise behavior.
|
At
December 31, 2006, the balance of unearned stock-based compensation to
be
expensed in future periods related to unvested share-based awards, as
adjusted
for expected forfeitures, is approximately $360,000. The period over
which the
unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized is approximately
three years. We anticipate that we will grant additional share-based
awards to
employees in the future, which will increase our stock-based compensation
expense by the additional unearned compensation resulting from these
grants. The
fair value of these grants is not included in the amount above, because
the
impact of these grants cannot be predicted at this time due to the dependence
on
the number of share-based payments granted. In addition, if factors change
and
different assumptions are used in the
F-10
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
-
Continued
application
of SFAS 123(R) in future periods, stock-based compensation expense recorded
under SFAS 123(R) may differ significantly from what has been recorded in
the current period.
Our
Employee Stock Option
Plans
have been deemed compensatory in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Stock-based
compensation relating to this plan was computed using the Black-Scholes
model
option-pricing formula with interest rates, volatility and dividend assumptions
as of the respective grant dates of the purchase rights provided to employees
under the plan. The weighted-average fair value of options existing under
all
plans during 2006 was $5.00.
The
following table summarizes stock-based compensation in accordance with
SFAS
123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was allocated as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense included in operating expenses
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
248
|
|
Tax
benefit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense, net of tax
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
||
The
following table reflects net income and diluted earnings per share for
the year
ended December 31, 2006, compared with proforma information for the year
ended December 31, 2005, had compensation cost been determined in
accordance with the fair value-based method prescribed by SFAS 123(R).
F-11
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
-
Continued
|
(in
thousands)
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
Net
loss, as reported under APB 25 for the prior period (1)
|
$
|
N/A
|
$
|
(1,700
|
)
|
||
|
Add
back stock based employee compensation expense in
reported
net loss, net of related tax effects
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
|
Subtract
total stock-based compensation expense determined
under
fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects(2)
|
(248
|
)
|
(750
|
)
|
|||
|
Net
loss including the effect of stock-based compensation expense(3)
|
$
|
(12,874
|
)
|
$
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
Loss
per share:
|
|||||||
|
Basic
and diluted, as reported for the prior period(1)
|
$
|
(3.65
|
)
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted, including the effect of stock-based
compensation
expense(3)
|
$
|
(3.65
|
)
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Net
loss and loss per share for periods prior to year 2006 does
not include
stock-based compensation expense under SFAS 123 because the
Company did
not adopt the recognition provisions of SFAS 123.
|
|
(2)
|
Stock-based
compensation expense for periods prior to year 2006 was calculated
based
on the pro forma application of SFAS 123.
|
|
(3)
|
Net
loss and loss per share for periods prior to year 2006 represent
pro forma
information based on SFAS 123.
|
Stock
compensation expense for options granted to nonemployees has been determined
in
accordance with SFAS 123 and EITF 96-18, “Accounting
for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring,
or
in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” as
the
fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity
instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
evaluating the potential impact of the implementation of SFAS 157 on our
financial position and results of operations.
In
June
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting
for Income Tax Uncertainties”
(FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of
tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be
sustained by the taxing authority. The recently issued literature also
provides
guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income
tax
uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. FIN 48 also
includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties
in interim
periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded
income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for Access as of
January 1, 2007. Any differences between the amounts recognized in the
balance sheets prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported
after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment
recorded
to the beginning balance of retained earnings. We are evaluating the
potential
impact of the implementation of FIN 48 on our financial position and
results of operations.
F-12
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
2 - LIQUIDITY
The
Company incurred significant losses from continuing operations of $13.4
million
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $7.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Additionally, at December 31, 2006, we had negative
working
capital of $5.8 million. As of December 31, 2006, we did
not have
sufficient funds to repay our convertible notes at their maturity and
support
our working capital and operating requirements.
We
do not
have funds to pay our debt obligations which are due in March, April
and
September 2007 and will have to raise more funds or attempt to restructure
the
convertible notes.
SCO
Capital Partners LLC Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement
On
December 6, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible
notes
due March 31, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common
stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants
were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO
Capital
Partners LLC (“SCO”) and affiliates.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible
notes
due March 31, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common
stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. The notes and warrants
were sold
in a private placement to a group of accredited investors led by SCO
and
affiliates.
On
February 16, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of 7.5%
convertible notes due March 31, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate
of
3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were
$4.5
million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to a
group of
accredited investors led by SCO and affiliates.
All
of
the notes mature on March 31, 2007, are convertible into Access common
stock at
a fixed conversion rate of $1.10 per share, bear interest of 7.5% per
annum and
are secured by certain assets of Access. Each note may be converted at
the
option of the noteholder or Access under certain circumstances as set
forth in
the notes.
Each
noteholder received a warrant to purchase a number of shares of common
stock of
Access equal to 75% of the total number shares of Access common stock
into which
such holder's note is convertible. Each warrant has an exercise price
of $1.32
per share and is exercisable at any time prior to February 16, 2012,
October 24,
2012 and December 6, 2012. In the event SCO and its affiliates were to
convert
all of their notes and exercise all of their warrants, they would own
approximately 74.1% of the voting securities of Access.
In
connection with its sale and issuance of notes and warrants, Access entered
into
an investors rights agreement whereby it granted SCO the right to designate
two
individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of Access while the notes
are
outstanding, and also granted registration rights with respect to the
shares of
common stock of Access underlying the notes and warrants.
The
Company believes that based on the funds available the Company will have
the
ability to pay its projected net cash burn rate of $750,000 per month
for seven
months. We will have to raise more funds to cover future months net cash
burn
rate and to pay our debt service or attempt to restructure the convertible
notes.
F-13
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Stephen
B. Howell, M.D., a Director, receives payments for consulting services
and
reimbursement of direct expenses and has also received warrants for his
consulting services. Dr. Howell’s payments for consulting services, expense
reimbursements and warrants are as follows:
|
Year
|
Consulting
Fees
|
Expense
Reimbursement
|
|||||
|
2006
|
$
|
69,000
|
$
|
5,000
|
|||
|
2005
|
79,000
|
5,000
|
|||||
|
2004
|
58,000
|
9,000
|
In
the
event SCO Capital Partners LLC (“SCO”) and its affiliates were to convert all of
their notes and exercise all of their warrants, they would own approximately
74.1% of the voting securities of Access. During 2006 SCO and affiliates
were
paid $415,000 in fees for the convertible notes that Access issued and
were paid
$131,000 in investor relations fees.
See
Note
9 for a discussion of our Restricted Stock Purchase Program.
NOTE
4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property
and equipment consists of the following:
|
December
31,
|
||||||
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
||||
|
Laboratory
equipment
|
$
|
1,090,000
|
$
|
1,090,000
|
|||
|
Laboratory
and building improvements
|
167,000
|
167,000
|
|||||
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
134,000
|
138,000
|
|||||
|
|
1,391,000
|
1,395,000
|
|||||
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,179,000
|
1,095,000
|
|||||
|
Net
property and equipment
|
$
|
212,000
|
$
|
300,000
|
|||
Depreciation
and amortization on property and equipment was $91,000, $225,000, and
$244,000
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
NOTE
5 - 401(k) PLAN
We
have a
tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering
all our employees. Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to
reduce
their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual
limit
($15,000 in 2006; $14,000 in 2005; and $13,000 in 2004) and to have the
amount
of such reduction contributed to the 401(k) Plan. We have a 401(k) matching
program whereby we contribute for each dollar a participant contributes
a like
amount, with a maximum contribution of 2% of a participant’s earnings. The
401(k) Plan is intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal
Revenue
Code so that contributions by employees or by us to the 401(k) Plan,
and income
earned on 401(k) Plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until
withdrawn from the 401(k) Plan, and so that contributions by us, if any,
will be
deductible by us when made. At the direction of each participant, we
invest the
assets of the 401(k) Plan in any of 23 investment options. Company contributions
under the 401(k) Plan were approximately $11,000 in 2006; $31,000 in
2005; and
$46,000 in 2004.
F-14
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
6 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In
October 2005 we sold our oral/topical care business to Uluru, Inc. for
up to
$18.6 million. At the closing of this agreement we received $8.7 million.
In
addition, due to the Amended Asset Sale Agreement in December 2006, we
received
$4.9 million and an obligation to receive from Uluru $350,000 on April
8, 2007
for the first and second anniversary payments and settlement of certain
milestones. We recorded $550,000 as revenue for the discontinued operations
in
2006. Any contingent liabilities arise in the future relating to our
former
business could reduce future receipts. Additional payments of up to $4.8
million, as amended by the Amended Asset Sale Agreement may be made upon
the
achievement of certain additional sales milestones.
In
September 2005 we closed our Australian laboratory and office, keeping
the
vitamin B12 technology.
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” operating
results for assets sold or held for sale are presented as discontinued
operations for current and all prior years presented. In accordance with
SFAS
No. 144 the operating results of these assets, along with the gain on
sale, have
been presented in discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
| Revenues |
$
|
550,000
|
$
|
781,000
|
$
|
549,000
|
||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Expenses | ||||||||||
|
Cost
of
product sales
|
|
(1,012,000
|
)
|
(239,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Research
and
development
|
(2,501,000
|
)
|
(3,082,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Depreciation
|
(237,000
|
)
|
(304,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total
expenses
|
-
|
(3,750,000
|
)
|
(3,625,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Income/loss from discontinued operations |
550,000
|
(2,969,000
|
)
|
(3,076,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Gain on sale of assets |
-
|
12,891,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Tax expense
|
(173,000
|
)
|
(4,067,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
|
Discontinued operations
|
$
|
377,000
|
$
|
5,855,000
|
$
|
(3,076,000
|
)
|
|||
We previously had licenses for the oral/topical assets. These licenses were sold to Uluru, Inc. in October 2005. In the Asset Sale Agreement between us and Uluru certain refunds and receipts were incurred before the date of sale and were assigned to either us or to Uluru. We have $173,000 recorded as a deferred gain on the sale until such time as approvals are received.
F-15
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
7 - DEBT
On
September 20, 2000, we completed a $13.5 million convertible note offering.
The
offering was placed with three investors. One investor was repaid in
2005,
$4,015,000. Our other convertible notes are due in two parts. The notes
bear
interest at 7.7% per annum with $733,000 of interest due annually on
September
13th.
$4,015,000
due on April 28, 2007.
This
investor’s notes have a fixed conversion price of $5.00 per share of common
stock and may be converted by the note holder or us under certain circumstances
as defined in the note. Upon a change of control, this investor is not
required
to automatically convert the note unless the amount payable to the investor
upon
change of control, issuable upon conversion of the note equals or exceeds
$7.50.
If the notes are not converted we will have to repay the notes on the
due dates.
The investor’s notes were amended November 3, 2005 extending the term and
adjusting the conversion price from $27.50 to $5.00 per common share.
The
amendment and modification resulted in us recording additional debt discount
of
$2.1 million, which will be accreted to interest expense to the revised
maturity
date. The interest due at December 31, 2006 was $92,000.
$5,500,000
due on September 13, 2010.
This
investor delayed his interest payment which was due in 2005 and 2006
until
September 13, 2007 or earlier if the Company raises more than $5.0 million
in
funds. The capitalized interest was $880,000 and interest on the capitalized
interest was $26,000 at December 31, 2006. The interest due on the convertible
note was $126,000 at December 31, 2006. This note has a fixed conversion
price
of $27.50 per share of common stock and may be converted by the note
holder or
us under certain circumstances as defined in the note. If the notes are
not
converted we will have to repay the notes on the due dates.
$6,000,000
due on March 31, 2007.
The
notes were sold in February 2006 in a private placement to a group of
accredited
investors led by SCO Capital Partners LLC and affiliates. We entered
into a note
and purchase agreement to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $5
million of
7.5% convertible notes due March 31, 2007 and warrants to purchase 3,863,634
shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were $4.5
million.
On
October 24, 2006, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement
pursuant
to which we sold and issued an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible
notes
due March 31, 2007 and warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common
stock of
Access. Net proceeds to Access were $450,000. On December 6, 2006, we
entered
into a note and warrant purchase agreement pursuant to which we sold
and issued
an aggregate of $500,000 of 7.5% convertible notes due March 31, 2007
and
warrants to purchase 386,364 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds
to
Access were $450,000. Interest due at December 31, 2006 on all notes
with SCO
and affiliates was $336,000.
All
these
notes with SCO and affiliates have a fixed conversion price of $1.10
per share
of common stock and may be converted by the note holder or us under certain
circumstances as defined in the note. If the notes are not converted
we will
have to repay the notes on the due dates.
The
Secured Convertible Notes include warrants and a conversion feature.
Until
September 30, 2006 we accounted for the warrants and conversion feature
as
liabilities and recorded at fair value. From the date of issuance to
September
30, 2006, the fair value of these instruments increased resulting in
a net
unrealized loss of $1.1 million. On October 1, 2006, we adopted the
provisions of EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting
for Registration Payment Arrangements” (EITF
00-19-2), which requires that contingent obligations to make future payments
under a registration payment arrangement be recognized and measured separately
in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting
for Contingencies.”
Under
previous guidance, the fair value of the warrant was recorded as a current
liability in our balance sheet, due to a potential cash payment feature
in the
warrant. Access may be required to pay in cash, up to 2% per month, as
defined,
as liquidated damages for failure to file a registration statement timely
as
required by an investor rights agreement. The current liability was
marked-to-market at each quarter end, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model, with the change being recorded to general and administrative expenses.
Under the new guidance in EITF 00-19-2, as we believe the likelihood
of such a
cash payment to
F-16
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
7 - DEBT - Continued
not
be
probable, have not recognized a liability for such obligations. Accordingly,
a
cumulative-effect adjustment of $1.4 million was made as of October 1, 2006
to accumulated deficit, representing the difference between the initial
value of
this warrant and its fair value as of this date and recorded to equity.
Subsequent
to the adoption of EITF 00-19-2 on October 1, 2006, the Company has accounted
for the $6,000,000 notes under EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application
of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Instruments.
The
value of the warrants was valued using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with
the following assumptions with a weighted average volatility of
120%,
expected
life of 6 years, expected yield of 0% and risk free rate of 5.0%. At
December
31, 2006, approximately $1.6M of
debt
discount related to the warrants and embedded conversion feature had
not been
amortized to interest expense. This will be amortized over the remaining
life of
the debt through March 31, 2007.
On
September 20, 2001, we completed a $600,000 installment loan with a bank.
The
note was paid in full in 2006.
NOTE
8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Future
maturities of the note payable and other obligations are as
follows:
|
Future
Maturities
|
Debt
|
|
|
2007
|
10,895,000
|
|
|
2010
|
5,500,000
|
The
debt
of $4,015,000 is discounted and at December 31, 2006 is on the balance
sheet as
$3,559,000.
The
debt
of $6,000,000 is discounted and at December 31, 2006 is on the balance
sheet as
$4,394,000.
Operating
Leases
At
December 31, 2006, we have commitments under noncancelable operating
leases for
office and research and development facilities until December 31, 2007
totaling
$75,000. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 was
$94,000, $168,000 and $166,000, respectively. We also have two other
noncancelable operating leases - one lease for a fire alarm system totaling
$12,000 ending in 2008 (expensing $7,000 in 2007 and $5,000 in 2008)
and one
lease for a copier totaling $48,000 ending in 2011 (with $9,600 expensed
each
year).
Legal
The
Company is not currently subject to any material pending legal
proceedings.
NOTE
9 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Restricted
Stock Purchase Program
On
October 12, 2000, the Board of Directors authorized a Restricted Stock
Purchase
Program. Under the Program, the Company’s executive officers and corporate
secretary were given the opportunity to purchase shares of common stock
in an
individually designated amount per participant determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. A total of 38,000 shares were purchased
under the Program by four eligible participants at $27.50 per share,
the fair
market value of the common stock on October 12, 2000, for an aggregate
consideration of $1,045,000. The purchase price was paid through the
participants’ delivery of a 50%-recourse promissory note payable to the Company
for three
F-17
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
9 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - Continued
executive
officer participants and a full-recourse promissory note payable to the
Company
for one participant. Each note bears interest at 5.87% compounded semi-annually
and has a maximum term of ten years. The notes are secured by a pledge
of the
purchased shares to the Company. The Company recorded the notes receivable
from
participants in this Program of $1,045,000 as a reduction of equity in
the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Interest on the notes is neither being collected
nor
accrued. The stock granted under the Program is fully vested at December
31,
2006.
Warrants
There
were warrants to purchase a total of 4,826,517 shares of common stock
outstanding at December 31, 2006. All warrants were exercisable at December
31,
2006. The warrants had various prices and terms as follows:
| Summary of Warrants |
|
Outstanding
|
Exercise
Price
|
Expiration
Date
|
||||||||
|
2006
convertible note (a)
|
3,863,634
|
$
|
1.32
|
2/16/12
|
||||||||
|
2006
convertible note (a)
|
386,364
|
1.32
|
10/24/12
|
|||||||||
|
2006
convertible note (a)
|
386,364
|
1.32
|
12/06/12
|
|||||||||
|
2006
investor relations advisor (b)
|
50,000
|
2.70
|
12/27/11
|
|||||||||
|
2004
offering (c)
|
89,461
|
35.50
|
2/24/09
|
|||||||||
|
2004
offering (c)
|
31,295
|
27.00
|
2/24/09
|
|||||||||
|
2003
financial advisor (d)
|
14,399
|
19.50
|
10/30/08
|
|||||||||
|
2002
scientific consultant (e)
|
2,000
|
24.80
|
2/01/09
|
|||||||||
|
2001
scientific consultant (f)
|
3,000
|
15.00
|
1/1/08
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
4,826,517
|
|||||||||||
| a) |
In
connection with the convertible note offerings in 2006, warrants
to
purchase a total of 4,636,362 shares of common stock were issued.
All of
the warrants are exercisable immediately and expire six years
from date of
issue.
|
| b) |
During
2006, an investor relations advisor received warrants to purchase
50,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.70 per share
at any time
from December 27, 2006 until December 27, 2011, for investor
relations
consulting services to be rendered in 2007. All of the warrants
were
exercisable at December 31, 2006. The fair value of the warrants
was $2.00
per share on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes pricing
model
with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0.0%,
risk-free
interest rate 4.58%, expected volatility 138% and a term of 2.5
years.
|
| c) |
In
connection with offering of common stock in 2004, warrants to
purchase a
total of 120,756 shares of common stock were issued. All of the
warrants
are exercisable and expire five years from date of
issuance.
|
| d) |
During
2003, financial advisors received warrants to purchase 14,399
shares of
common stock at any time until October 30, 2008, for financial
consulting
services rendered in 2003 and 2004. All the warrants are exercisable.
The
fair value of the warrants was $14.10 per share on the date of
the grant
using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
expected dividend yield 0.0%, risk-free interest rate 2.9%, expected
volatility 92% and a term of 5 years.
|
F-18
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
9 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - Continued
| e) |
During
2002, a director who is also a scientific advisor received warrants
to
purchase 2,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$24.55 per
share at any time until February 1, 2009, for scientific consulting
services rendered in 2002. The fair value of the warrants was
$18.50 per
share on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes pricing
model with
the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0.0%, risk-free
interest rate 3.90%, expected volatility 81% and a term of 7
years.
|
| f) |
During
2001, a director who is also a scientific advisor received warrants
to
purchase 3,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$15.00 per
share at any time until January 1, 2008, for scientific consulting
services rendered in 2001. The fair value of the warrants was
$13.70 per
share on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes pricing
model with
the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0.0%, risk-free
interest rate 5.03%, expected volatility 118% and a term of 7
years.
|
2001
Restricted Stock Plan
We
have a
restricted stock plan, the 2001 Restricted Stock Plan, as amended, under
which
80,000 shares of our authorized but unissued common stock were reserved
for
issuance to certain employees, directors, consultants and advisors. The
restricted stock granted under the plan generally vests, 25% two years
after the
grant date with additional 25% vesting every anniversary date. All stock
is
vested after five years. At December 31, 2006 there were 27,182 shares
issued
and 52,818 shares available for grant under the 2001 Restricted Stock
Plan.
NOTE
10 - STOCK OPTION PLANS
We
have
various stock-based employee compensation plans described below:
2005
Equity Incentive Plan
We
have a
stock awards plan, (the “2005 Equity Incentive Plan”), under which 1,000,000
shares of our authorized but unissued common stock were reserved for
issuance to
employees of, or consultants to, one or more of the Company and its affiliates,
or to non-employee members of the Board or of any board of directors
(or similar
governing authority) of any affiliate of the Company. The 2005 Equity
Incentive
Plan replaced the previously approved stock option plan (the 1995 Stock
Awards
Plan").
For
the
2005 Equity Incentive Plan, the fair value of options was estimated at
the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2006: dividend
yield of
0%; volatility of 127%; risk-free interest rate of 4.85%; and expected
lives of
1.6 years. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.36
per
share during 2006. The assumptions for grants in fiscal 2005 were: dividend
yield of 0%; volatility of 113%; risk-free interest rate of 4.71%; and
expected
lives of four years. The weighted average fair value of options granted
was
$8.50 per share during 2005.
F-19
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
10 - STOCK OPTION PLANS - Continued
Summarized
information for the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is as follows:
|
Weighted-
|
|||
|
average
|
|||
|
exercise
|
|||
|
Options
|
price
|
||
|
Outstanding
options at January 1, 2005
|
-
|
$
-
|
|
|
Granted,
fair value of $8.50 per share
|
50,000
|
5.45
|
|
|
Outstanding
options at December 31, 2005
|
50,000
|
5.45
|
|
|
Granted,
fair value of $ 0.36 per share
|
753,872
|
1.32
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
(1,200)
|
3.15
|
|
|
Outstanding
options at December 31, 2006
|
802,672
|
1.04
|
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2005
|
14,000
|
5.45
|
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2006
|
204,718
|
2.00
|
The
intrinsic value of options under this plan related to the outstanding
and
exercisable options were $1,554,000 and $281,000, respectively, at December
31,
2006.
Further
information regarding options outstanding under the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan
at December 31, 2006 is summarized below:
|
Number
of
|
Weighted
average
|
Number
of
|
Weighted
aververage
|
|||
|
|
options
|
Remaining
|
Exercise
|
options
|
Remaining
|
Exercise
|
|
Range
of excercise prices
|
outstanding
|
life
in years
|
price
|
exerciseable
|
life
in years
|
price
|
|
$0.63
- 0.85
|
717,000
|
9.6
|
$0.63
|
129,250
|
9.6
|
$0.63
|
|
$3.15
- 5.45
|
85,672
|
8.9
|
4.49
|
75,468
|
8.9
|
4.36
|
|
802,672
|
204,718
|
|||||
2000
Special Stock Option Plan
On
February 11, 2000 we adopted the 2000 Special Stock Option Plan and Agreement
(the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the award of options to purchase 100,000
shares of the authorized but unissued shares of common stock of the Company.
At
December 31, 2006, there were no additional shares available for grant
under the
Plan.
Under
the
2000 Special Stock Option Plan, 100,000 options were issued in 2000 and
are
outstanding at December 31, 2006. All of the options in the 2000 Special
Stock
Option Plan were exercisable at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. All
of the
options expire on June 30, 2007 and have an exercise price of $12.50
per
share.
1995
Stock Awards Plan
Under
the
1995 Stock Awards Plan, as amended, 500,000 shares of our authorized
but
unissued common stock were reserved for issuance to optionees including
officers, employees, and other individuals performing services for us.
At
December 31, 2006, there were no additional shares available for grant
under the
1995 Stock Awards Plan. A total of 360,917 options were outstanding under
this
plan at December 31, 2006.
Options
granted under all the plans generally vest ratably over a four to five
year
period and are generally exercisable over a ten-year period from the
date of
grant. Stock options were generally granted with an exercise price equal
to the
market value at the date of grant.
F-20
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
10 - STOCK OPTION PLANS - Continued
Under
the
1995 Stock Awards Plan, the fair value of options was estimated at the
date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted
average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively:
dividend yield of 0% for both periods; volatility of 104% and 41%; risk-free
interest rates of 4.15% and 3.61%, respectively, and expected lives of
four
years for all periods. The weighted average fair values of options granted
were
$6.45 and $10.90 per share during 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Summarized
information for the 1995 Stock Awards Plan is as follows:
|
Weighted-
|
||
|
average
|
||
|
exercise
|
||
|
Options
|
price
|
|
|
Outstanding
options at January 1, 2004
|
410,725
|
$
17.25
|
|
Granted,
fair value of $10.90 per share
|
62,840
|
28.75
|
|
Exercised
|
(21,939)
|
11.90
|
|
Forfeited
|
(15,196)
|
21.05
|
|
Outstanding
options at December 31, 2004
|
436,430
|
18.80
|
|
Granted,
fair value of $6.45 per share
|
49,700
|
12.05
|
|
Forfeited
|
(55,859)
|
17.30
|
|
Outstanding
options at December 31, 2005
|
430,271
|
18.20
|
|
Forfeited
|
(69,354)
|
19.12
|
|
Outstanding
options at December 31, 2006
|
360,917
|
18.03
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2004
|
334,232
|
18.20
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2005
|
406,760
|
18.40
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2006
|
349,990
|
18.12
|
There was no intrinsic value related to outstanding or exercisable options under this plan at December 31, 2006.
Further
information regarding options outstanding under the 1995 Stock Awards
Plan at
December 31, 2006 is summarized below:
|
Range
of
|
Number
of
|
Weighted
average
|
Number
of
|
Weighted
average
|
||
|
exercise
|
shares
|
Remaining
|
Exercise
|
shares
|
Remaining
|
Exercise
|
|
prices
|
outstanding
|
life
in years
|
price
|
exercisable
|
life
in years
|
Price
|
|
$10.00
- 12.50
|
147,640
|
3.6
|
$11.15
|
139,032
|
3.3
|
$11.12
|
|
$14.05
- 18.65
|
112,717
|
1.9
|
16.61
|
112,717
|
1.9
|
16.61
|
|
$20.25
- 34.38
|
100,560
|
2.1
|
29.73
|
98,241
|
2.0
|
29.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,917
|
|
|
349,990
|
|
|
F-21
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
11 - INCOME TAXES
Income
tax expense differs from the statutory amounts as follows:
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
|
Income
taxes at U.S. statutory rate
|
$
|
(4,378,000
|
)
|
$
|
(438,000
|
)
|
$
|
(3,442,000
|
)
|
|
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
3,972,000
|
(2,051,000
|
)
|
895,000
|
||||||
|
Change
in miscellaneous items
|
(130,000) |
397,000
|
598,000
|
|||||||
|
Benefit
of foreign losses not recognized
|
58,000 |
304,000
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Expenses
not deductible
|
240,000 |
738,000
|
7,000
|
|||||||
|
Expiration
of net operating loss and general
|
||||||||||
|
business
credit carryforwards, net of revisions
|
238,000
|
1,050,000
|
1,942,000
|
|||||||
|
Total
tax expense
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Deferred
taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial
reporting
bases and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities. The temporary
differences
that give rise to deferred tax assets were as follows:
|
December
31,
|
||||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
|
Deferred
tax assets (liabilities)
|
||||||||||
|
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
$
22,634,000
|
$
20,261,000
|
$
20,808,000
|
|||||||
|
General
business credit carryforwards
|
2,402,000
|
2,261,000
|
2,094,000
|
|||||||
|
Deferred
gain on sale of oral/topical care assets
|
-
|
(1,490,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
|
Property,
equipment and goodwill
|
46,000
|
78,000
|
259,000
|
|||||||
|
Gross
deferred tax assets
|
25,082,000
|
21,110,000
|
23,161,000
|
|||||||
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(25,082,000
|
)
|
(21,110,000
|
)
|
(23,161,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Net
deferred taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
At
December 31, 2006, we had approximately $66,569,000 of net operating
loss
carryforwards and approximately $2,402,000 of general business credit
carryforwards. These carryforwards expire as follows:
|
|
Net
operating
loss
carryforwards
|
General
business
credit
carryforwards
|
|||||
|
2007
|
$
|
994,000
|
$
|
26,000
|
|||
|
2008
|
4,004,000
|
138,000
|
|||||
|
2009
|
1,661,000
|
185,000
|
|||||
|
2010
|
2,171,000
|
140,000
|
|||||
|
2011
|
4,488,000
|
13,000
|
|||||
|
Thereafter
|
53,251,000
|
1,900,000
|
|||||
|
$
|
66,569,000
|
$
|
2,402,000
|
||||
As a result of a merger on January 25, 1996, a change in control occurred for federal income tax purposes which limits the utilization of pre-merger net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3,100,000 to approximately $530,000 per year.
F-22
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Three
years ended December 31, 2006
NOTE
12 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Our
results of operations by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005
were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
2006
Quarter Ended
|
|||||||||||||
|
March
31
|
June
30
|
September
30
|
December
31
|
||||||||||
|
Loss
from operations
|
$
|
(4,856
|
)
|
$
|
(3,331
|
)
|
$
|
(2,015
|
)
|
$
|
(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
550
|
|||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,856
|
)
|
$
|
(3,331
|
)
|
$
|
(2,015
|
)
|
$
|
(2,672
|
)
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted income/loss per common share
|
$
|
(1.38
|
)
|
$
|
(0.94
|
)
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
|
|
2005
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
|
March
31
|
|
|
June
30
|
|
|
September30
|
|
|
December31
|
|||
|
Loss
from operations
|
$
|
(1,616
|
)
|
$
|
(2,988
|
)
|
$
|
(1,612
|
)
|
$
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
(806
|
)
|
(798
|
)
|
(451
|
)
|
7,910
|
||||||
|
Net
loss/income
|
$
|
(2,422
|
)
|
$
|
(3,786
|
)
|
$
|
(2,063
|
)
|
$
|
6,571
|
||
|
Basic
and diluted loss per
common
share
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
$
|
(1.21
|
)
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
$
|
2.11
|
||
NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
On
March
30, 2007, Access and SCO Capital Partners LLC and affiliates agreed to
extend
the maturity date of an aggregate of $6,000,000 of 7.5% convertible notes
to
April 27, 2007 from March 31, 2007.
On
February 21, 2007 we announced we had entered into a non-binding letter
of
intent to acquire Somanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pursuant to the terms
of the
non-binding letter of intent, upon consummation of the acquisition, Somanta’s
preferred and common shareholders would receive an aggregate of 1.5 million
shares of Access’ common shares which would represent approximately 13% of the
combined company assuming the conversion of Access’ existing convertible debt
under existing terms of conversion. The closing of the transaction is
subject to
numerous conditions including the execution of a definitive Merger Agreement,
receipt of necessary approvals as well as completion of our due diligence
investigation. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be
consummated or if consummated, that it will be on the terms described
herein.
F-23
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Our
Articles of Incorporation include an indemnification provision under which
we
have agreed to indemnify our directors and officers from and against certain
claims arising from or related to future acts or omissions as directors or
officers. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and
controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore,
unenforceable.
The
following table sets forth estimated expenses expected to be incurred in
connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being
registered. We will pay all expenses in connection with this
offering.
|
Type
of Expense
|
|
|
Amount
|
||
|
Securities
and Exchange Commission Registration Fee
|
|
$
|
1, | 174 |
|
|
Transfer
Agent Fees
|
|
|
2, | 500 |
|
|
Printing
and Engraving Expenses
|
|
|
15, | 000 |
|
|
Accounting
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
5,
|
000 |
|
|
Legal
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
6, | 326 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30, | 000 |
|
On
February 16, 2006, the Registrant entered into a note and warrant purchase
agreement pursuant to which it sold and issued an aggregate of $5,000,000 of
7.5% convertible notes due March 31, 2007 and warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 3,863,634 shares of common stock of Access. Net proceeds to Access were
$4.557 million. The notes and warrants were sold in a private placement to
a
group of accredited investors led by SCO and its affiliates.
All
of
the above-described issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Section
4(2) of the Securities Act or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder,
as transactions not involving a public offering.
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description of Document |
| 2.1 |
Amended
and Restated Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization between
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Chemex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated as
of
October 31, 1995 (Incorporated by reference toy Exhibit A of the
our
Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995, Commission
File No. 33-64031)
|
| 2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and amoung us, Somanta Acquisition Corp., Somanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somanta Inc. and Somanta Ltd. dated April 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference on our Form 8-K, Exhibit 2.1, dated April 19, 2007) |
| 3.0 |
Articles
of incorporation and bylaws:
|
| 3.1 |
Certificate
of Incorporation (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3(a) of
our Form
8-B dated July 12, 1989, Commission File Number
9-9134)
|
II-1
| 3.2 |
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed August 21,
1992
|
| 3.3 |
Certificate
of Merger filed January 25, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit E
of our Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995,
Commission File No. 33-64031)
|
| 3.4 |
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed January 25,
1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit E of our Registration Statement
on
Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995, Commission File No.
33-64031)
|
| 3.5 |
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed July 18, 1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-K for
the year
ended December 31, 1996)
|
| 3.6 |
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed June 18, 1998.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-Q for
the quarter
ended June 30, 1998)
|
| 3.7 |
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed July 31, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-Q for
the quarter
ended March 31, 2001)
|
| 3.8 |
Certificate
of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
filed
November 7, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.h of
our
Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated December 14, 2001, Commission
File No. 333-75136)
|
| 3.9 |
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
our Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1996)
|
| * |
10.1 |
1995
Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit F of our
Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995, Commission
File No. 33-64031)
|
| * |
10.2
|
Amendment
to 1995 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.25 of
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001)
|
|
10.3
|
Lease
Agreement between Pollock Realty Corporation and us dated July
25, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Form 10-Q for
the
quarter ended September 30, 1996)
|
|
10.4
|
Platinate
HPMA Copolymer Royalty Agreement between The School of Pharmacy,
University of London and the Company dated November 19, 1996 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
September 30, 1996)
|
| * |
10.5
|
Employment
Agreement of David P. Nowotnik, PhD (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Form 10-K for the year ended
December
31, 1999)
|
| * |
10.6
|
401(k)
Plan (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of our Form 10K for the year ended
December
31, 1999)
|
| * |
10.7
|
2000
Special Stock Option Plan and Agreement (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
September 30, 2000)
|
|
10.8
|
Form
of Convertible Note (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
September 30, 2000)
|
| 10.9 |
Rights
Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2001 between the us and American
Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October
19,
2001)
|
|
10.10
|
Amendment
to Rights Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2006 between us
and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(2)
|
| * |
10.11
|
2001
Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A
of our
Proxy Statement filed on April 16,
2001)
|
| * |
10.12
|
2005
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of
our Proxy
Statement filed on April 18, 2005
|
| * | 10.13 |
Agreement,
dated as of May 10, 2005 by and between us and Kerry P. Gray
(1)
|
| * |
10.14
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2005 by and between us and Stephen
B.
Thompson (1)
|
| 10.15 |
AssetSale
Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005, between us and Uluru,
Inc.
(1)
|
|
10.16
|
Amendment to
Asset Sale Agreement, dated as December 8, 2006,
between us and Uluru,
Inc.
|
| 10.17 | License Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005, between us and Uluru, Inc. (1) |
II-2
|
10.18
|
Amendment
to 7% (Subject to Adjustment) Convertible Promissory Notes
Due September
13, 2005, dated as of November 3, 2005, between us and Oracle
Partners LP,
Oracle Institutional Holders LP, SAM Oracle Investments Inc.
and Oracle
Offshore Ltd. (1)
|
| 10.19 |
Noteand
Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated February 16, 2006 between
us and certain
Secured Parties (3)
|
|
10.20
|
Security
Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between us and certain
Secured Parties
(2)
|
| 10.21 |
Form
of 7.5% Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February
16, 2006,
issued by us and to certain Purchasers
(2)
|
| 10.22 |
Form
of Warrant, dated February 16, 2006, issued by us to certain
Purchasers
(2)
|
| 10.23 |
Investor
Rights Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between us and
certain
Purchasers (2)
|
| 10.24 |
Note
and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated October 24, 2006 between
us and
certain Secured Parties (3)
|
|
10.25
|
Security
Agreement, dated October 24, 2006, between us and certain
Secured Parties
(3)
|
|
10.26
|
Form
of 7.5% Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated October
24, 2006,
issued by us and to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.27
|
Form
of Warrant, dated October 24, 2006, issued by us to certain
Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.28
|
Investor
Rights Agreement, dated October 24, 2006, between us and
certain
Purchasers(3)
|
|
10.29
|
Note
and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated December 6, 2006 between
us and
certain Secured Parties
(3)
|
|
10.30
|
Security
Agreement, dated December 6, 2006, between us and certain Secured
Parties
(3)
|
|
10.31
|
Form
of 7.5% Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated December 6,
2006,
issued by us and to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.32
|
Form
of Warrant, December 6, 2006, issued by us to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.33
|
Investor
Rights Agreement, dated December 6, 2006, between us and certain
Purchasers (3)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of the registrant
|
| 23.1 |
Consent
of Whitley Penn LLP
|
| 23.2 |
Consent
of Grant Thornton LLP
|
|
23.3
|
Consent of Bingham McCutchen LLP (Previously
Filed)
|
| 24.1 | Power of Attorney (Previously Filed) |
|
*
|
Management
contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit
to this
Form pursuant to Item 15(c) of the
report.
|
| (1) |
Incorporated
by reference to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005
|
| (2) |
Incorporated
by reference to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2006
|
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. |
The
undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1)
To
file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made pursuant
to this
Registration Statement, a post-effective amendment to this Registration
Statement:
|
(i)
|
to
include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act
of 1933.
|
|
(ii)
|
to
reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after
the effective
date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a
fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration
statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease
in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities
offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any
deviation from
the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range
may be
reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission
pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price
represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate
offering
price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the
effective registration.
|
II-3
|
(iii)
|
to
include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution
not previously disclosed in this Registration Statement or any material
change to such information in this Registration
Statement.
|
(2)
That,
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933,
each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new Registration
Statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide
offering thereof.
(3)
To
remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the
securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.
The
undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining
any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the Registrant’s
annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual
report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
is
incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to
be a
new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and
the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona
fide offering thereof.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933
may
be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions described in Item 15 above, or otherwise,
the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a
claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by
the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that
it
meets all of the requirements for filing on Form SB-2 and authorized
this
registration statement to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned
on
April 26, 2007.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May
1, 2007
|
By
|
/s/ Stephen
R. Seiler
|
|
|
|
Stephen
R. Seiler
|
|
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
||
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May
1, 2007
|
By
|
/s/ Stephen
B. Thompson
|
|
|
|
Stephen
B. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
||
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
||
We,
the
undersigned directors of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc., hereby severally
constitute and appoint Stephen R. Seiler and Stephen B. Thompson, and both
or
either one of them, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full
power of substitution and re-substitution in for him and in his name, place
and
stead, and in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including
post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement, and any subsequent
registration statements pursuant to Rule 462 of the Securities Act, and to
file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause
to
be done by virtue hereof.
In
accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
/s/
Stephen R. Seiler
|
|
|
|
Stephen
R. Seiler, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
/s/
Mark J. Ahn
|
|
|
|
Mark
J. Ahn, Director
|
|
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
Mark
J. Alvino, Director
|
||
II-5
|
|
||
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
/s/
Esteban Cvitkovic, MD
|
|
|
Esteban
Cvitkovic, MD
|
||
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
B. Davis, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
|
J.
Michael Flinn, Director
|
|
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
Stephen
B. Howell, MD, Director
|
||
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
/s/
David P. Luci
|
|
|
David
P. Luci, Director
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
Herbert
H. McDade, Jr., Director
|
||
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
Rosemary
Mazanet, MD, PhD, Director
|
||
|
Date:
May 1, 2007
|
*
|
|
|
John
J. Meakem, Jr., Director
|
||
|
*
|
Executed
May 1, 2007 by Stephen B. Thompson as attorney-in-fact under power
of
attorney granted in Registration Statement previously filed on July
12,
2006.
|
II-6
|
2.1
|
Amended
and Restated Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization
between Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Chemex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated
as of
October 31, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of
the our
Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995,
Commission
File No. 33-64031)
|
| 2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and amoung us, Somanta Acquisition Corp., Somanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somanta Inc. and Somanta Ltd. dated April 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference on our Form 8-K, Exhibit 2.1, dated April 19, 2007) |
| 3.0 |
Articles
of incorporation and
bylaws:
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3(a) of
our Form
8-B dated July 12, 1989, Commission File Number
9-9134)
|
| 3.2 |
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed August 21,
1992
|
| 3.3 |
Certificate
of Merger filed January 25, 1996. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit E
of our Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21,
1995,
Commission File No. 33-64031)
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed January
25, 1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit E of our Registration
Statement on
Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995, Commission File No.
33-64031)
|
|
3.5
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed July 18,
1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-K
for the year
ended December 31, 1996)
|
|
3.6
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed June 18,
1998.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended June 30, 1998)
|
|
3.7
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed July 31,
2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended March 31, 2001)
|
| 3.8 |
Certificate
of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock filed
November 7, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.h
of our
Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated December 14, 2001,
Commission
File No. 333-75136)
|
| 3.9 |
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
of our Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1996)
|
| * | 10.1 |
1995
Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit F of
our
Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995,
Commission
File No. 33-64031)
|
| * |
10.2
|
Amendment
to 1995 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.25 of
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001)
|
|
10.3
|
Lease
Agreement between Pollock Realty Corporation and us dated July
25, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Form 10-Q
for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996)
|
|
10.4
|
Platinate
HPMA Copolymer Royalty Agreement between The School of Pharmacy,
University of London and the Company dated November 19, 1996
(Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
September 30, 1996)
|
| * |
10.5
|
Employment
Agreement of David P. Nowotnik, PhD (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December
31, 1999)
|
| * |
10.6
|
401(k)
Plan (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of our Form 10K for the year
ended December
31, 1999)
|
| * |
10.7
|
2000
Special Stock Option Plan and Agreement (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
September 30, 2000)
|
|
10.8
|
Form
of Convertible Note (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
September 30, 2000)
|
| 10.9 |
Rights
Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2001 between the us and
American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October
19,
2001)
|
|
10.10
|
Amendment
to Rights Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2006 between
us and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(2)
|
| * | 10.11 |
2001
Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix
A of our
Proxy Statement filed on April 16,
2001)
|
| * |
10.12
|
2005
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1
of our Proxy
Statement filed on April 18, 2005
|
II-7
| * |
10.13
|
Agreement,
dated as of May 10, 2005 by and between us and Kerry P. Gray
(1)
|
| * |
10.14
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2005 by and between us and Stephen
B.
Thompson (1)
|
| * |
10.15
|
Asset
Sale Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005, between us and
Uluru, Inc.
(1)
|
|
10.16
|
Amendment
to Asset Sale Agreement, dated as December 8, 2006, between
us and Uluru,
Inc.
|
|
10.17
|
License
Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005, between us and Uluru,
Inc.
(1)
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment
to 7% (Subject to Adjustment) Convertible Promissory
Notes Due September
13, 2005, dated as of November 3, 2005, between us and
Oracle Partners LP,
Oracle Institutional Holders LP, SAM Oracle Investments
Inc. and Oracle
Offshore Ltd. (1)
|
|
10.19
|
Note
and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated February 16, 2006
between us and
certain Secured Parties (3)
|
|
10.20
|
Security
Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between us and
certain Secured Parties
(2)
|
|
10.21
|
Form
of 7.5% Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated February
16, 2006,
issued by us and to certain Purchasers
(2)
|
|
10.22
|
Form
of Warrant, dated February 16, 2006, issued by us to
certain Purchasers
(2)
|
|
10.23
|
Investor
Rights Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between
us and certain
Purchasers (2)
|
|
10.24
|
Note
and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated October 24, 2006
between us and
certain Secured Parties
(3)
|
|
10.25
|
Security
Agreement, dated October 24, 2006, between us and certain Secured
Parties
(3)
|
|
10.26
|
Form
of 7.5% Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated October 24,
2006,
issued by us and to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.27
|
Form
of Warrant, dated October 24, 2006, issued by us to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.28
|
Investor
Rights Agreement, dated October 24, 2006, between us and certain
Purchasers (3)
|
|
10.29
|
Note
and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated December 6, 2006 between
us and
certain Secured Parties (3)
|
|
10.30
|
Security
Agreement, dated December 6, 2006, between us and certain Secured
Parties
(3)
|
|
10.31
|
Form
of 7.5% Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated December 6,
2006,
issued by us and to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.32
|
Form
of Warrant, December 6, 2006, issued by us to certain Purchasers
(3)
|
|
10.33
|
Investor
Rights Agreement, dated December 6, 2006, between us and certain
Purchasers (3)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of the registrant
|
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Whitley Penn LLP
|
|
23.2
|
Consent
of Grant Thornton LLP
|
|
23.3
|
Consent
of Bingham McCutchen LLP (Previously
Filed)
|
| 24.1 | Power of Attorney (Previously Filed) |
|
*
|
Management
contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit
to this
Form pursuant to Item 15(c) of the
report.
|
| (4) |
Incorporated
by reference to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
|
| (5) |
Incorporated
by reference to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2006.
|
| (6) |
Incorporated
by reference to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006.
|
II-8